Notices
5.0L General Discussion This section is for non-tech specific information pertaining to 5.0L Mustangs.

347 Stroker MPG

Old 05-17-2012, 08:06 AM
  #1  
teamcrackitracing
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: NY
Posts: 10
Default 347 Stroker MPG

Hey guys-
I just bought a 91 Mustang with a 347 Stroker. Right as I was leaving with the car, the guy told me the reason he was selling it was because it only got 7mpg ! Does this sound right? I mean, it seems pretty rediculous for a motor with street heads (andersons i believe) and n/a. Could it be that the ECU needs a tune or something? I have no idea, and I cant decide whether or not to sell this or my bonestock 90 GT.
teamcrackitracing is offline  
Old 05-17-2012, 09:42 AM
  #2  
Tony71502
5th Gear Member
 
Tony71502's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 2,459
Default

Sounds like something isn't built right, not surprising. There's no way it should be getting only 7 mpg.
Tony71502 is offline  
Old 05-17-2012, 10:13 AM
  #3  
ttocs
6th Gear Member
 
ttocs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location:
Posts: 6,936
Default

dunno by the time you get done with gears and all it might not go too far but 7 sounds a little low unless he could not keep his foot out of it.
ttocs is offline  
Old 05-17-2012, 12:46 PM
  #4  
bluebeastsrt
6th Gear Member
 
bluebeastsrt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Jersey
Posts: 11,564
Default

10 to 12 should be about normal. By normal I mean driving the Mustang like a Mustang. Have you filled it up and checked the milage for yourself?
bluebeastsrt is offline  
Old 05-18-2012, 01:33 AM
  #5  
tinman
5th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Arizona
Posts: 4,103
Default

My full on N/A drag car uses a sort of a 347 and I'd bet that I get better than 7MPG.
I think the car needs a tune and a good looking at by somebody that knows all the specs on whats inside the engine.
tinman is offline  
Old 05-18-2012, 06:40 AM
  #6  
teamcrackitracing
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: NY
Posts: 10
Default

Yeah thats what I figured. Im going to have to look into this when I get home to see it.... I wonder if its still running stock fueling maps haha. Thanks guys.
teamcrackitracing is offline  
Old 05-18-2012, 06:29 PM
  #7  
reldla1996
2nd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Ohio
Posts: 325
Default

A really wild (or is that fun) cam could net you 7 mpg...while a mild cam could net you 15 mpg (or more). My mileage has been varying from 13.5 to 15, and my O2 sensors are not yet connected. Would you believe my 13.5 has been on track days????
reldla1996 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Brett Ludlow
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
7
09-23-2015 06:59 AM
EASTIDEE123
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
5
09-15-2015 11:08 AM
EASTIDEE123
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
14
09-14-2015 03:52 PM
algregory
4.6L V8 Technical Discussions
4
09-11-2015 11:44 AM
YoungStangsMan
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
15
09-05-2015 07:01 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: 347 Stroker MPG


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

© 2019 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands

We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.