5.0L General Discussion This section is for non-tech specific information pertaining to 5.0L Mustangs.

Does this seem slow to you?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-06-2013, 02:02 PM
  #11  
mtflyboy25
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
mtflyboy25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: AZ - Arizona
Posts: 779
Default

Originally Posted by StalkerGT
I think it should be in the high 13's at the least. When I first got my car it went 14.5@96 with stock heads and cam, 2.73's, crappy street tires and didn't have a good tune up done
I bet the DA wasnt 4500 and you didnt have a 2600 stall which didnt let you hit power til the 330 ft?
mtflyboy25 is offline  
Old 05-06-2013, 05:23 PM
  #12  
bluebeastsrt
6th Gear Member
 
bluebeastsrt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Jersey
Posts: 11,565
Default

Originally Posted by StalkerGT
I think it should be in the high 13's at the least. When I first got my car it went 14.5@96 with stock heads and cam, 2.73's, crappy street tires and didn't have a good tune up done
It should run those times at see level. The DA & sixty is killing the times.
bluebeastsrt is offline  
Old 05-06-2013, 05:56 PM
  #13  
StalkerGT
2nd Gear Member
 
StalkerGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 354
Default

Ohhh gotcha....didn't know it made that much of a difference. Well obviously the 60 ft time does
StalkerGT is offline  
Old 05-06-2013, 06:47 PM
  #14  
mjr46
D.R. THE PATHETIC DORK
 
mjr46's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 30,863
Default

gearing sucks, heads suck, stall sucks, and your altitude there is a killer, best thing you can do for that combo , rather than start all over, is add a supercharger or turbo, on3 kit = best bang for the buck
mjr46 is offline  
Old 05-06-2013, 07:17 PM
  #15  
bluebeastsrt
6th Gear Member
 
bluebeastsrt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Jersey
Posts: 11,565
Default

Good advice mjr. OP. forced induction is a much better set-up for cars at high DA over a naturally aspirated car.
bluebeastsrt is offline  
Old 05-07-2013, 12:46 AM
  #16  
tinman
5th Gear Member
 
tinman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Arizona
Posts: 4,103
Default

One way to sort of beat high density altitude is to use more gear than you would ordinarily use.
Like 4.30 when you would use 4.10 at sea level.
Thats why some cars in stock eliminator in NHRA use such wild gears.
As for as the air goes I know it will only get worse until about the first of October.
I've seen over 7300'A.D. here at Tucson in July........
tinman is offline  
Old 05-07-2013, 11:22 AM
  #17  
mtflyboy25
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
mtflyboy25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: AZ - Arizona
Posts: 779
Default

Originally Posted by bluebeastsrt
It should run those times at see level. The DA & sixty is killing the times.
Yeah I wish I could run at seas level. Last place I ran was Bandimere in Denver, CO. So I only know about high altitude 5000+ DA drag racing haha.

Originally Posted by StalkerGT
Ohhh gotcha....didn't know it made that much of a difference. Well obviously the 60 ft time does
It makes a huge difference. At Bandimere you lost basically 2 seconds on a stock NA car.

Originally Posted by mjr46
gearing sucks, heads suck, stall sucks, and your altitude there is a killer, best thing you can do for that combo , rather than start all over, is add a supercharger or turbo, on3 kit = best bang for the buck
I agree with you man... on3 ? I have never heard of them? $1600 for a full kit is a DAMN good price, but makes me think it lacks quality pieces. Do you have any experience with it?


Originally Posted by bluebeastsrt
Good advice mjr. OP. forced induction is a much better set-up for cars at high DA over a naturally aspirated car.
Yes 3-5 lbs of boost generally overcomes the losses from high altitude.

Originally Posted by tinman
One way to sort of beat high density altitude is to use more gear than you would ordinarily use.
Like 4.30 when you would use 4.10 at sea level.
Thats why some cars in stock eliminator in NHRA use such wild gears.
As for as the air goes I know it will only get worse until about the first of October.
I've seen over 7300'A.D. here at Tucson in July........
I have seen crazy gears but this is a Street / Strip car, so I will most likely stay with my 3.27s for that 2.1 k 70 mph cruising speed. Its great for the mpgs...

I am used to 7000+ DA... I normally raced at 8500 at Bandimere in the summers in my old 2011 GT. I just want to run faster than it... I ran a 13.06 @108.7 mph there...

The speed mods will come later though. Right now I have to make her look good. Full interior black is on its way...
mtflyboy25 is offline  
Old 05-07-2013, 11:40 AM
  #18  
mjr46
D.R. THE PATHETIC DORK
 
mjr46's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 30,863
Default

yes i have experience with it, installed one for a friend, he to runs ported e7 heads, the turbo will make up for the shortfalls in the combo, with 12-14 lbs of boost on a simialar build be made 479 to the tires and ran 11.2 @123
mjr46 is offline  
Old 05-07-2013, 04:46 PM
  #19  
mtflyboy25
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
mtflyboy25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: AZ - Arizona
Posts: 779
Default

Originally Posted by mjr46
yes i have experience with it, installed one for a friend, he to runs ported e7 heads, the turbo will make up for the shortfalls in the combo, with 12-14 lbs of boost on a simialar build be made 479 to the tires and ran 11.2 @123
That isnt half bad...
mtflyboy25 is offline  
Old 05-07-2013, 06:19 PM
  #20  
darkmach1
4th Gear Member
 
darkmach1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location:
Posts: 1,799
Default

Before you go throwing more power at this this setup, which will only disappoint you even more, throw a set of DRs or slicks and put it on the dyno to see what it puts down as it may need a tune. These 2 things might be all you need.
darkmach1 is offline  


Quick Reply: Does this seem slow to you?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:52 PM.