400 Horsepower 1988 302ci?? - MustangForums.com

5.0L General Discussion This section is for non-tech specific information pertaining to 5.0L Mustangs.

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-31-2014, 02:02 AM   #1
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: CA
Posts: 6
Default 400 Horsepower 1988 302ci??

Hey I am trying to get my car to ~400 HP to the flywheel (hoping around 350-375 to the wheels)
I have a 1988 Mustang 5.0 engine and I'm putting it in a 68 mustang.
I've read that the 68 is ~300 lbs lighter than an 88.
So far, I am planning on adding:
1) Elgin E-951-P Performance Cam from AM. Comp Cams recommended a similar cam with slightly higher lifter and longer duration, but for $200 more I'll stick with this one.
2) AFR 185cc Heads
3) Tri-Y Headers
I read an article that claimed after cleaning up the engine, adding afr heads, tri-y headers, and upgraded rocker arms that they got the car pushing just over 400 hp to the flywheel. Not sure how accurate it was thought because they claimed after cleaning up the engine and throwing on a single 4 barrel carb manifold they gained ~50 hp or something like that.
I had the engine boiled and the cylinders looked to be in great shape so I didn't have them bored out, only honed. I'm going to use the same pistons and just get a re-ring kit. I'm also going to carbs, I have a dual 4 barrel carb intake manifold from edelbrock that I'm going to use and 2 4 barrel elderbrock carbs. I am also going to go from the c4 auto trans that came with it to a 5-speed manual (IF YOU KNOW WHERE TO BUY ONE CHEAP, PLEASE TELL ME! THANKS ) and I have a 9" posi rear end right now, but I will probably be switching to an 8.8" rear end with ~3.55-3.73 gears.
I want to keep the car streetable. I just want a crazy amount of horsepower without going to super/turbo chargers. I want to be able to keep up with the new 2011+ 5.0 mustangs
Thanks so much guys!
justme123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2014, 01:38 AM   #2
5th Gear Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Arizona
Posts: 4,103

You will see about 250HP at the flywheel with the build you outlined....
400HP from a 302 costs a lot of money and it won't be 'streetable' either.
This is experience speaking.
tinman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2014, 04:25 PM   #3
2nd Gear Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Ohio
Posts: 325

That cam and those heads do not go together. A cam in the 225 duration and 0.500 lift will get you into the 350 flywheel hp area with those heads, assuming the intake ports reasonably match the head ports, which will be a lot of fun in a classic Mustang. The cam you've selected will choke the engine power, but will put out a lot of torque down low, and get decent gas mileage.
reldla1996 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2014, 12:12 PM   #4
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: CA
Posts: 6


That is where I got the build list from. I've heard car craft was a reliable source to pull info from
justme123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2014, 06:39 PM   #5
4th Gear Member
Venomantidote95's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: alabama
Posts: 1,812

Usually a na 400hp 302 is a 347.
Venomantidote95 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2014, 07:18 PM   #6
6th Gear Member
bluebeastsrt's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Jersey
Posts: 11,559

Somebody had vodka for breakfast before they wrote that carcraft article. But with those heads, a better cam and a really good intake like a victor jr. or a trick flow "R" series to let the motor breathe and a good free flowing exhaust with long tube headers I can see you making 360-370 crank HP. My 5.0 made 306WHP with similar parts. Plenty of motor to keep up with a stock coyote at the strip.
bluebeastsrt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2014, 09:48 PM   #7
3rd Gear Member
65Raven65's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 747

Originally Posted by justme123 View Post
I've read that the 68 is ~300 lbs lighter than an 88.

And an '88 is a good 400 lbs. or so lighter than a 2011+ if I recall.

Like bluebeastsrt said, you're probably not gonna need 400 hp to keep up with a Coyote with your circa 700 lb. weight advantage, as long as you can get the power to the ground.
65Raven65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2014, 09:27 AM   #8
88 orangepeel notch
6th Gear Member
88 orangepeel notch's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 5,062

Yep, I'd lower your hp goals and exploit your weight advantage. Check my sig, you don't need 400hp to run with the new stuff.
88 orangepeel notch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2014, 10:17 AM   #9
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: tennessee
Posts: 144

higher lift/duration in a solid roller with a r series intake and full free flowing exhaust is as close as you will get with a 302
pedalhappy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2014, 02:24 PM   #10
6th Gear Member
w8less's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: KY
Posts: 13,398

i would skip the whole na concept. i would just jump right to an on3 turbo kit and raise boost till the block splits
w8less is offline   Reply With Quote

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
4 Valve Head questions GimpyHSHS 4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang 7 06-17-2017 01:18 PM
Starting a new project....could use some input. Matt's 95 Stang 5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang 2 10-05-2015 08:16 AM
Hello from Mn, GTJIM New Member Area 7 09-23-2015 10:59 AM
Two Mustangs Battle Two Motorcycles In Latest Motorcycle vs. Car Drift Series MustangForums Editor Mustang News, Concepts, Rumors & Discussion 0 09-18-2015 01:25 PM

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump

Featured Sponsors
Vendor Directory

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:58 AM.

We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.