2011 FORD MUSTANG GT TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
#1
2011 FORD MUSTANG GT TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
I was just browsing my Owners Advantage website when I came across this release...Click on the image to go to the article/tech sheet.
The official tech sheet can be found on that page or directly here...
http://media.ford.com/images/10031/2...g_GT_Specs.pdf
The official tech sheet can be found on that page or directly here...
http://media.ford.com/images/10031/2...g_GT_Specs.pdf
#4
Those transmission ratios are kinda weird. The manual only has one gear less than 1:1 whereas the auto (and gt500 trans) has two. Also the manual's 1:1 gear is moved to 5th instead of 4th like the GT500 trans. The auto has a HUGE 1st gear. 4.17:1...damn. Just think what that gear is like with 4.10's. LOL! Bat **** crazy right there.
It looks like the car increased about 100-150 lbs. Not bad. Still a good 400 lbs or so less than the camaro and challenger and makes very similar power. Muahaha!
I like. It's going to be hard for me to wait for the 2012 Boss 302.
It looks like the car increased about 100-150 lbs. Not bad. Still a good 400 lbs or so less than the camaro and challenger and makes very similar power. Muahaha!
I like. It's going to be hard for me to wait for the 2012 Boss 302.
#10
The 5.0 badge may not even make it into production as is. These are just pre-release images.
I like Cubic inches also since it is much more accurate, but they sound better with big blocks than with small blocks. 302 isn't as impressive as say a 351. But 5.0 is very inaccurate. The Ford 302 and the Chevy 305 are both 5.0, very inaccurate, since you loose the subtle differences which differentiate the motor and the maker.
I like Cubic inches also since it is much more accurate, but they sound better with big blocks than with small blocks. 302 isn't as impressive as say a 351. But 5.0 is very inaccurate. The Ford 302 and the Chevy 305 are both 5.0, very inaccurate, since you loose the subtle differences which differentiate the motor and the maker.
Last edited by chronos; 12-29-2009 at 08:14 PM.