Notices
5.0L V8 Technical Discussions Any questions about the 'Coyote' engine, transmission, exhaust, tuners/CAI, or gearing can be asked here!

2011 FORD MUSTANG GT TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-29-2009, 06:48 PM
  #1  
Murphdog
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
Murphdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 552
Default 2011 FORD MUSTANG GT TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS

I was just browsing my Owners Advantage website when I came across this release...Click on the image to go to the article/tech sheet.


The official tech sheet can be found on that page or directly here...
http://media.ford.com/images/10031/2...g_GT_Specs.pdf
Murphdog is offline  
Old 12-29-2009, 06:53 PM
  #2  
guitarist4life
2nd Gear Member
 
guitarist4life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Washington
Posts: 253
Default

Holy cow. Good info and bad..its a heavy one thats for sure.
guitarist4life is offline  
Old 12-29-2009, 07:13 PM
  #3  
Lv XLR8N
2nd Gear Member
 
Lv XLR8N's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 404
Default

The video is just awesome to watch though. Car is hot.
Lv XLR8N is offline  
Old 12-29-2009, 07:49 PM
  #4  
SirKnightTG
5th Gear Member
 
SirKnightTG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Deep in the <3 of Tx
Posts: 3,925
Default

Those transmission ratios are kinda weird. The manual only has one gear less than 1:1 whereas the auto (and gt500 trans) has two. Also the manual's 1:1 gear is moved to 5th instead of 4th like the GT500 trans. The auto has a HUGE 1st gear. 4.17:1...damn. Just think what that gear is like with 4.10's. LOL! Bat **** crazy right there.

It looks like the car increased about 100-150 lbs. Not bad. Still a good 400 lbs or so less than the camaro and challenger and makes very similar power. Muahaha!

I like. It's going to be hard for me to wait for the 2012 Boss 302.
SirKnightTG is offline  
Old 12-29-2009, 07:52 PM
  #5  
WeinerDog
4th Gear Member
 
WeinerDog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 1,247
Default

That 5.0 emblem looks silly. Sacrilege, I know.
WeinerDog is offline  
Old 12-29-2009, 07:54 PM
  #6  
SirKnightTG
5th Gear Member
 
SirKnightTG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Deep in the <3 of Tx
Posts: 3,925
Default

Originally Posted by WeinerDog
That 5.0 emblem looks silly. Sacrilege, I know.

HEATHEN!










I like it. But I'd still prefer 302 since I like cubes.
SirKnightTG is offline  
Old 12-29-2009, 07:56 PM
  #7  
WeinerDog
4th Gear Member
 
WeinerDog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 1,247
Default

"302" is the upgrade for '12. LOL I really think they should have used that on the '11.
WeinerDog is offline  
Old 12-29-2009, 07:57 PM
  #8  
2010vastang
 
2010vastang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: virginia
Posts: 42
Default

with that extra weight us 2010 owners and other modified stang shhould have no problem hanging with the 2011's. Thats getting up there with camero weight.
2010vastang is offline  
Old 12-29-2009, 07:59 PM
  #9  
abarker8541
3rd Gear Member
 
abarker8541's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location:
Posts: 680
Default

11:1 compression, hot damn. gonna take a lot to put a blower on that sucka.
abarker8541 is offline  
Old 12-29-2009, 08:09 PM
  #10  
chronos
3rd Gear Member
 
chronos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: CA
Posts: 750
Default

The 5.0 badge may not even make it into production as is. These are just pre-release images.

I like Cubic inches also since it is much more accurate, but they sound better with big blocks than with small blocks. 302 isn't as impressive as say a 351. But 5.0 is very inaccurate. The Ford 302 and the Chevy 305 are both 5.0, very inaccurate, since you loose the subtle differences which differentiate the motor and the maker.

Last edited by chronos; 12-29-2009 at 08:14 PM.
chronos is offline  


Quick Reply: 2011 FORD MUSTANG GT TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:59 AM.