The Weakest 2011 5.0 ever Made
#1
The Weakest 2011 5.0 ever Made
It is official. I have the weakest 5.0 that does not make anything near the horsepower / torque numbers that people are claiming on this forum.
Had the car for three months. Bought Brenspeed stage two powerpack. Brought Mods to be installed. had stock baseline dyno done on my Brembo manual. three Dyno runs were done in 4th gear on a Clayton Dyno. Temperature was around 68 degrees
Horsepower 346 Torque 309! WTF
I have been told that Clayton dynos (similar to Mustang dynos) measure lower than others but 309? I want my money back my engine is crap or the dyno is way off or all you people bragging about stock pulls at 390 horses are full of it.
Had the car for three months. Bought Brenspeed stage two powerpack. Brought Mods to be installed. had stock baseline dyno done on my Brembo manual. three Dyno runs were done in 4th gear on a Clayton Dyno. Temperature was around 68 degrees
Horsepower 346 Torque 309! WTF
I have been told that Clayton dynos (similar to Mustang dynos) measure lower than others but 309? I want my money back my engine is crap or the dyno is way off or all you people bragging about stock pulls at 390 horses are full of it.
#2
TROLL?
Read up on how the various Dyno's operate. Then go dyno the car on a Dynojet and make 380 RWHP and 340/350 RWTQ
jesus, you are putting almost 100 HP to the ground more than a stock 2005-2010 Mustangs and are whining like a little bitch.
and stock pulls at 390 HP are with TUNING. but a stock setup otherwise
Read up on how the various Dyno's operate. Then go dyno the car on a Dynojet and make 380 RWHP and 340/350 RWTQ
jesus, you are putting almost 100 HP to the ground more than a stock 2005-2010 Mustangs and are whining like a little bitch.
and stock pulls at 390 HP are with TUNING. but a stock setup otherwise
#3
Tylus, you are right. My vagina is doing the talking for me and it is saying 309 torque? It's enough to make a man request a sex change. I have read up on how the different dynos work. 309? still doesn't make sense. Especially in the cool weather. I'm squeakin like a bitch because right now that is what I feel my car is suited for, a bitch. And there are guys on this forum and on others that do claim 390 rwhp stock. There is no accounting for the variation. 346 on a manual sucks anyway you look at it and I want to throw a tantrum because I want to track this car. I got it specifically for that purpose and it's throwing out weakass numbers under perfect conditions. We'll see what I am able to do with it. I will put it on a dynapack or a dynojet when all is said and done but man those numbers are discouraging.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Matt's 95 Stang
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
2
10-05-2015 07:16 AM
BeatnikFink
New Member Area
6
10-01-2015 08:00 PM
treesloth
New Member Area
4
09-28-2015 07:03 AM