Notices
5.0L V8 Technical Discussions Any questions about the 'Coyote' engine, transmission, exhaust, tuners/CAI, or gearing can be asked here!

Comp Cams - 2011-2012 Mustang 5.0L Coyote Camshafts - AmericanMuscle.com

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-29-2011, 11:11 AM
  #21  
Mishri
Mish-ogynist
 
Mishri's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Helena, MT
Posts: 3,780
Default

if people are consistently seeing a 50whp gain across the board then they are likely worth the cost, is that with supporting mods like cai/exhaust/boss intake? 460whp N/A sounds like fun.

edit: watched the vid, most of the gains are after 6000rpm, with 429whp and 390wtq I wonder if it was an otherwise stock car? looks like it has exhaust, but that might only be muffler/tips. Now I don't know.... might not be worth it, I'll have to see track results and more testing with full bolt ons.

Last edited by Mishri; 05-29-2011 at 11:20 AM.
Mishri is online now  
Old 05-29-2011, 02:48 PM
  #22  
parchisi
3rd Gear Member
 
parchisi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: New Mexico...FML
Posts: 599
Default

Couldn't really see it in the video, but looks like the hp curve was below stock under 5k rpm. The cams really started to come into their own at 5,500 rpm. Seeing a full dyno graph including torque curves would be very enlightening. Also curious that the specs listed on the first post state an LSA of 126. Is that just a starting point or is that locked in? If its a locked in LSA, that might contribute to "peaky" engine performance.
parchisi is offline  
Old 05-31-2011, 03:43 PM
  #23  
Mishri
Mish-ogynist
 
Mishri's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Helena, MT
Posts: 3,780
Default

I'd be willing to guess that the only time it will be worth doing cams is if you are doing heads too. they've gotten 500whp already out of a H/C/I combo, I'm sure in time they'll be getting more out of it too. I believe when I added up all of the mods it was almost the same as the supercharger right now, but maybe in the future if it's cheaper to do H/C/I and get 550whp I might go that route (probably not)
Mishri is online now  
Old 02-07-2012, 01:25 AM
  #24  
arion45
 
arion45's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: California
Posts: 4
Default

Any updates on the comp cams?
arion45 is offline  
Old 02-07-2012, 09:06 AM
  #25  
essayons
2nd Gear Member
 
essayons's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Virginia
Posts: 229
Default

nvm...
essayons is offline  
Old 02-07-2012, 11:31 AM
  #26  
JIM5.0
5th Gear Member
 
JIM5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 4,404
Default

Originally Posted by parchisi
Also curious that the specs listed on the first post state an LSA of 126. Is that just a starting point or is that locked in? If its a locked in LSA, that might contribute to "peaky" engine performance.
If I remember correctly, the LSA of 126degrees is the stock default LSA with the TiVCT in default position. I doubt that it means that you lose independent cam phasing, I think it means that in default position, the TiVCT always returns to 126 degrees LSA with the ability to spread them out wider or narrow them in closer depending on the RPM bandwidth you are in.

As for the power really coming to its own in the higher RPM bandwidths, longer duration cams, which these all are, are suited for that. Of course, the stage three ones with the longest duration out of the stage choices. is the one that shifts the torque curve, and therefore the power curve, upwards in the RPM bandwidth.

And thus, you do sacrifice some low end torque and therefore power with longer duration cams because of poorer exhaust scavenging and some exhaust gas coming back through the still open exhaust port to pollute the fresh incoming fuel-air charge, thus the "lope."
This can be corrected by opening the LSA with TiVCT to minimize the valve overlap and also by choosing an exhaust of tuned header lengths so that the return pulses assist in proper scavenging to pull out the exhaust gases rather push some of it back in to pollute the next charge. Of course, a tuned exhaust for lower RPM to eliminate lope will not be as beneficial for higher RPM operation.
JIM5.0 is offline  
Old 08-04-2012, 03:16 PM
  #27  
Tommy Mac
 
Tommy Mac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: TN
Posts: 1
Default

Originally Posted by arion45
Any updates on the comp cams?
Theys been a lot a problems with those cams. Comp's manufacturer screwed them up on machining oil holes and rear sprocket. Comp didn't catch it and a lot got out. Then they found out Ford had changed the print and they had hundreds of set made to the wrong specs. It happens when you try to do that stuff on the sly.
Tommy Mac is offline  
Old 08-13-2012, 02:20 AM
  #28  
lawman1
1st Gear Member
 
lawman1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 55
Default

I have a dyno graph you can look at on the cams/head/intake. As far as the torque curve, it moves to the right. You don't notice any loss down low. What you do notice is the irresistible desire to step into it. And As far as the cams being bad. Mine arent. My car has had at least 10 dyno pulls and substantial safe but vigorous driving no problems.
lawman1 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
djbigskrilla
2005-2014 Mustangs
24
09-20-2022 01:04 AM
ding56
Classic Mustangs (Tech)
3
08-14-2015 02:40 AM
daytooday
Motor Swap Section
2
08-11-2015 09:22 AM
Redneck1465
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
5
08-08-2015 10:39 PM
mustangfan305
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
3
08-07-2015 11:09 AM



Quick Reply: Comp Cams - 2011-2012 Mustang 5.0L Coyote Camshafts - AmericanMuscle.com



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:08 AM.