Notices
5.0L V8 Technical Discussions Any questions about the 'Coyote' engine, transmission, exhaust, tuners/CAI, or gearing can be asked here!

Quick question on new 2012 gt

Old 09-14-2011, 12:11 PM
  #11  
Napoleon85
2nd Gear Member
 
Napoleon85's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: OH
Posts: 317
Default

Originally Posted by VistaBlue
The '11-'12 has a much more extreme form of engine braking that uses little to no fuel. It slows the car down a lot faster, and is more efficient.
Interesting ... I usually press the clutch in before/during hard braking. I'll have to try to remember not to do that a few times and see if I feel a big difference.
Napoleon85 is offline  
Old 09-14-2011, 12:19 PM
  #12  
shoeys08dkcandygt
4th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
shoeys08dkcandygt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 1,895
Default

yes i know how engines work but this one just does it a lot quicker than my last 3 mustangs (06,07,08)
shoeys08dkcandygt is offline  
Old 09-14-2011, 03:58 PM
  #13  
VistaBlue
2nd Gear Member
 
VistaBlue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 380
Default

Originally Posted by potman
Does engine braking with a manural transmission hurt the engine or clutch? (aside from extreme braking)

The only way I can think of that you could damage your clutch by engine braking would be if you're downshifting to a lower gear (to continue engine braking further) and don't rev match properly. Even then, that's really no more wear than everyday driving, slipping the clutch to leave stop lights, etc.
VistaBlue is offline  
Old 09-15-2011, 12:53 AM
  #14  
Thrashard340
2nd Gear Member
 
Thrashard340's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: CA
Posts: 423
Default

Engine braking places more wear and tear on a motor through the life of the motor. I use very little engine braking and take the car out of gear when braking to a stop. When you are in neutral coasting of braking to stop, the engine is close to idle and not loaded. When decel engine braking, you are placing the under load while the RPMs drags the car to a stop. Not only does this increase frictional drag on the motor, but the transmission as well. Over time, it probably won't matter too much since engine and drivetrain technology has improved over the years and you probably will not experience premature failure while you own the car due to engine braking. But to answer your question, it does place additional stress on the motor and transmission.
Thrashard340 is offline  
Old 09-15-2011, 07:44 AM
  #15  
VistaBlue
2nd Gear Member
 
VistaBlue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 380
Default

Using the same logic, driving your car causes more wear and tear, so you might as well just park it and never start it to make it last the longest.
VistaBlue is offline  
Old 09-15-2011, 07:48 AM
  #16  
Napoleon85
2nd Gear Member
 
Napoleon85's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: OH
Posts: 317
Default

Originally Posted by VistaBlue
Using the same logic, driving your car causes more wear and tear, so you might as well just park it and never start it to make it last the longest.
Not at all ... I see a very clear distinction between normal operation, and operating the car in such a way as to cause additional wear-and-tear.
Napoleon85 is offline  
Old 09-15-2011, 01:09 PM
  #17  
kline
 
kline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: cali
Posts: 9
Default

My car does this every once an a while and it's a auto. Did it once and my girlfriend thought I hit something.
kline is offline  
Old 09-15-2011, 05:12 PM
  #18  
JIM5.0
5th Gear Member
 
JIM5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 4,404
Default

Originally Posted by Napoleon85
Not at all ... I see a very clear distinction between normal operation, and operating the car in such a way as to cause additional wear-and-tear.
Good point.

Aside from wear and tear, I also notice the MPG counter read out better MPG when you coast in idle vs coast in gear with the engine braking.
Apparently, while coasting in gear, the PCM has to dump more fuel in to prevent the engine from leaning out where when you coast out of gear engagement, you go to idle and therefore idle fuel consumption.
JIM5.0 is offline  
Old 09-15-2011, 06:03 PM
  #19  
hawkeye18
3rd Gear Member
 
hawkeye18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Norfolk, VA
Posts: 627
Default

Originally Posted by JIM5.0
Good point.

Aside from wear and tear, I also notice the MPG counter read out better MPG when you coast in idle vs coast in gear with the engine braking.
Apparently, while coasting in gear, the PCM has to dump more fuel in to prevent the engine from leaning out where when you coast out of gear engagement, you go to idle and therefore idle fuel consumption.
That's funny, as the PCM actually shuts off all fuel to the injectors when coasting in gear. The engine turns into an air pump, and since there's no fuel to combust, lean conditions aren't really an issue.
hawkeye18 is offline  
Old 09-16-2011, 09:38 AM
  #20  
VistaBlue
2nd Gear Member
 
VistaBlue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 380
Default

Originally Posted by Napoleon85
Not at all ... I see a very clear distinction between normal operation, and operating the car in such a way as to cause additional wear-and-tear.
If engine braking wasn't normal operation, Ford wouldn't have spent so much time developing and making such a big fuss about how advanced their new engine braking computer calibration is.

Originally Posted by hawkeye18
That's funny, as the PCM actually shuts off all fuel to the injectors when coasting in gear. The engine turns into an air pump, and since there's no fuel to combust, lean conditions aren't really an issue.
It also depends on what RPM you're engine braking at. Many (modern) cars completely cut fuel above 1500ish RPM, but have a wee bit of fuel injected below 1500ish RPM, presumably to ease the transition/surging going back on throttle.
VistaBlue is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Quick question on new 2012 gt



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:35 PM.