87 8.8 in my 67
#1
87 8.8 in my 67
well, my friend purchased a wrecked 87 gt for some parts and has the rear left over - what's it gonna take to adapt it to my 67? i know it's about 1/2 wider (big whoop) but the driveshaft length shouldb e the same right? and i'd have to mod the spring perches correct? any sites with info on it or a write up?
#3
RE: 87 8.8 in my 67
And heavier. And possibly not the right width.
I have a fox 8.8 sitting at a friend's place waiting for me to build it. The width is perfect for 67-78. You'll need to dig up some ranger axles and get the spring mounts changed, but it's not that big a deal. A good driveline shop should be able to do it for you and get the pinion angle correct.
I'll post the donor vehicles you can steal parts (axles and brakes) from later tonight when I get home.
I have a fox 8.8 sitting at a friend's place waiting for me to build it. The width is perfect for 67-78. You'll need to dig up some ranger axles and get the spring mounts changed, but it's not that big a deal. A good driveline shop should be able to do it for you and get the pinion angle correct.
I'll post the donor vehicles you can steal parts (axles and brakes) from later tonight when I get home.
#4
RE: 87 8.8 in my 67
ORIGINAL: Starfury
And heavier. And possibly not the right width.
I have a fox 8.8 sitting at a friend's place waiting for me to build it. The width is perfect for 67-78. You'll need to dig up some ranger axles and get the spring mounts changed, but it's not that big a deal. A good driveline shop should be able to do it for you and get the pinion angle correct.
I'll post the donor vehicles you can steal parts (axles and brakes) from later tonight when I get home.
And heavier. And possibly not the right width.
I have a fox 8.8 sitting at a friend's place waiting for me to build it. The width is perfect for 67-78. You'll need to dig up some ranger axles and get the spring mounts changed, but it's not that big a deal. A good driveline shop should be able to do it for you and get the pinion angle correct.
I'll post the donor vehicles you can steal parts (axles and brakes) from later tonight when I get home.
#5
RE: 87 8.8 in my 67
Doesn't matter that much in a straight line but if you plan on turning the car (I'm more of a road course kind of guy), all that extra weight in the *** end doesn't help. And it's pretty hard to break an 8.8 with anaturally aspirated289/302 (even a stroker). If you can get your hands on one for really cheap (or free), I'd consider it a good deal. The only real downside I see with an 8.8 is that it's not a removable carrier design, which can suck if you want to change the gears down the road.
Axles:
Twod-side side axles from an 83-92 Ranger/Bronco II with a 4cyl or 3.0 V6 and7.5" rear, or two p-side axles from an 86-97 Aerostar.
Brake drumscan come from any of the same vehicles.
Axles:
Twod-side side axles from an 83-92 Ranger/Bronco II with a 4cyl or 3.0 V6 and7.5" rear, or two p-side axles from an 86-97 Aerostar.
Brake drumscan come from any of the same vehicles.
#7
RE: 87 8.8 in my 67
ORIGINAL: Starfury
Doesn't matter that much in a straight line but if you plan on turning the car (I'm more of a road course kind of guy), all that extra weight in the *** end doesn't help. And it's pretty hard to break an 8.8 with anaturally aspirated289/302 (even a stroker). If you can get your hands on one for really cheap (or free), I'd consider it a good deal. The only real downside I see with an 8.8 is that it's not a removable carrier design, which can suck if you want to change the gears down the road.
Axles:
Twod-side side axles from an 83-92 Ranger/Bronco II with a 4cyl or 3.0 V6 and7.5" rear, or two p-side axles from an 86-97 Aerostar.
Brake drumscan come from any of the same vehicles.
Doesn't matter that much in a straight line but if you plan on turning the car (I'm more of a road course kind of guy), all that extra weight in the *** end doesn't help. And it's pretty hard to break an 8.8 with anaturally aspirated289/302 (even a stroker). If you can get your hands on one for really cheap (or free), I'd consider it a good deal. The only real downside I see with an 8.8 is that it's not a removable carrier design, which can suck if you want to change the gears down the road.
Axles:
Twod-side side axles from an 83-92 Ranger/Bronco II with a 4cyl or 3.0 V6 and7.5" rear, or two p-side axles from an 86-97 Aerostar.
Brake drumscan come from any of the same vehicles.
#9
RE: 87 8.8 in my 67
ORIGINAL: Starfury
And it's pretty hard to break an 8.8 with anaturally aspirated289/302 (even a stroker).
And it's pretty hard to break an 8.8 with anaturally aspirated289/302 (even a stroker).