Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

87 8.8 in my 67

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-18-2007, 05:52 PM
  #1  
SalikDDD
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
SalikDDD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 671
Default 87 8.8 in my 67

well, my friend purchased a wrecked 87 gt for some parts and has the rear left over - what's it gonna take to adapt it to my 67? i know it's about 1/2 wider (big whoop) but the driveshaft length shouldb e the same right? and i'd have to mod the spring perches correct? any sites with info on it or a write up?
SalikDDD is offline  
Old 12-18-2007, 07:37 PM
  #2  
mjr46
D.R. THE PATHETIC DORK
 
mjr46's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 30,863
Default RE: 87 8.8 in my 67

why waste the effort..find a 9 inch and it'll bolt right up and be stronger
mjr46 is offline  
Old 12-18-2007, 07:54 PM
  #3  
Starfury
6th Gear Member
 
Starfury's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Elk Grove, CA
Posts: 5,896
Default RE: 87 8.8 in my 67

And heavier. And possibly not the right width.

I have a fox 8.8 sitting at a friend's place waiting for me to build it. The width is perfect for 67-78. You'll need to dig up some ranger axles and get the spring mounts changed, but it's not that big a deal. A good driveline shop should be able to do it for you and get the pinion angle correct.

I'll post the donor vehicles you can steal parts (axles and brakes) from later tonight when I get home.
Starfury is offline  
Old 12-18-2007, 08:07 PM
  #4  
mjr46
D.R. THE PATHETIC DORK
 
mjr46's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 30,863
Default RE: 87 8.8 in my 67

ORIGINAL: Starfury

And heavier. And possibly not the right width.

I have a fox 8.8 sitting at a friend's place waiting for me to build it. The width is perfect for 67-78. You'll need to dig up some ranger axles and get the spring mounts changed, but it's not that big a deal. A good driveline shop should be able to do it for you and get the pinion angle correct.

I'll post the donor vehicles you can steal parts (axles and brakes) from later tonight when I get home.
with the proper research the right one can be sourced.....just gotta know where to source one from..besides I build my motors powerful enough that the little extra weight of a nine inch is of no concern
mjr46 is offline  
Old 12-18-2007, 10:22 PM
  #5  
Starfury
6th Gear Member
 
Starfury's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Elk Grove, CA
Posts: 5,896
Default RE: 87 8.8 in my 67

Doesn't matter that much in a straight line but if you plan on turning the car (I'm more of a road course kind of guy), all that extra weight in the *** end doesn't help. And it's pretty hard to break an 8.8 with anaturally aspirated289/302 (even a stroker). If you can get your hands on one for really cheap (or free), I'd consider it a good deal. The only real downside I see with an 8.8 is that it's not a removable carrier design, which can suck if you want to change the gears down the road.

Axles:
Twod-side side axles from an 83-92 Ranger/Bronco II with a 4cyl or 3.0 V6 and7.5" rear, or two p-side axles from an 86-97 Aerostar.

Brake drumscan come from any of the same vehicles.
Starfury is offline  
Old 12-18-2007, 10:28 PM
  #6  
andrewmp6
6th Gear Member
 
andrewmp6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location:
Posts: 8,162
Default RE: 87 8.8 in my 67

A 9 inch is stronger then a 8.8 that 8.8 might fit with some work cuting off all the mounts and welding on the spring perchs id like the rest of them get a 9 inch.
andrewmp6 is offline  
Old 12-18-2007, 10:46 PM
  #7  
mjr46
D.R. THE PATHETIC DORK
 
mjr46's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 30,863
Default RE: 87 8.8 in my 67

ORIGINAL: Starfury

Doesn't matter that much in a straight line but if you plan on turning the car (I'm more of a road course kind of guy), all that extra weight in the *** end doesn't help. And it's pretty hard to break an 8.8 with anaturally aspirated289/302 (even a stroker). If you can get your hands on one for really cheap (or free), I'd consider it a good deal. The only real downside I see with an 8.8 is that it's not a removable carrier design, which can suck if you want to change the gears down the road.

Axles:
Twod-side side axles from an 83-92 Ranger/Bronco II with a 4cyl or 3.0 V6 and7.5" rear, or two p-side axles from an 86-97 Aerostar.

Brake drumscan come from any of the same vehicles.
gotchaI'm more of a straight line guy......I love my removable carrier in my 66.....makes a gear swap a breeze..If I'm quick less than a hour
mjr46 is offline  
Old 12-18-2007, 11:20 PM
  #8  
mustang289
2nd Gear Member
 
mustang289's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location:
Posts: 235
Default RE: 87 8.8 in my 67

I really need to learn how to change R&P's, its something i've always said i would do, i've built motors, trannys, done everything else, maybe someone can make it a sticky? hint hint....
mustang289 is offline  
Old 12-19-2007, 02:09 PM
  #9  
tarafied1
2nd Gear Member
 
tarafied1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Western KY
Posts: 479
Default RE: 87 8.8 in my 67

ORIGINAL: Starfury

And it's pretty hard to break an 8.8 with anaturally aspirated289/302 (even a stroker).
I did, broke the spider gears with bone stock 5.0! Had stock rims and tires (no slicks). It did take a lot of abuse before it broke however...
tarafied1 is offline  
Old 12-19-2007, 09:44 PM
  #10  
Scott H.
5th Gear Member
 
Scott H.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location:
Posts: 2,445
Default RE: 87 8.8 in my 67

.....

Last edited by Scott H.; 01-14-2010 at 11:51 PM.
Scott H. is offline  


Quick Reply: 87 8.8 in my 67



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:58 PM.