Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

rear springs: reverse eye? standard eye?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-15-2009, 01:06 PM
  #21  
jonward786
3rd Gear Member
 
jonward786's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 678
Default

Originally Posted by JMD
I know I will be at odds with A LOT of people on here, but so what...

I can not imagine anyone wanting to DROP the REAR of a Classic Mustang a single fraction of an inch...

I can see dropping the front... but I have NEVER been a fan of the going up hill look...
lol well you see, the beauty of it is...you can drop BOTH front and rear and keep it level!!
jonward786 is offline  
Old 05-15-2009, 03:34 PM
  #22  
JMD
6th Gear Member
 
JMD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: AR
Posts: 5,469
Default

Originally Posted by jonward786
lol well you see, the beauty of it is...you can drop BOTH front and rear and keep it level!!
I am convinced that in the early 1960s, a Ford engineeer made a error with his slide ruller which resulted in 64,65, and 66 Mustangs being built with a nose high stance...

I think this mistake went into production and was then accepted as a Mustang "trademark" of sorts...

When I say that I have always found this to be true I mean it. I made this observation in my earliest memories of Mustangs...

IMO the nose high stance is more VISIBLE on coupes.

Originally Posted by Starfury
JMD, I'm very happy with my 1" drop springs. They actually raised the rear of the car about 3/4" from the height they were at with sagged 1" drop springs. With my 1" drop fronts and the Shelby drop, the car sits pretty much level.
those stock rear springs get pretty soft. I know when we put the 9" rear on the stock springs with the 408, the springs were soft enough that they would wrap up ant the PINNION was hitting the floorboard... ..

The drop in the front will go a long way to make things look right...
JMD is offline  
Old 12-19-2009, 05:06 PM
  #23  
GT SALLY
 
GT SALLY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 1
Default

I have a '66 factory GT coupe with a lean to one side like a ski slope. After reading this thread, it sounds like the 5 leaf mid-eye will give me the correct ride height for a GT which is 1" lower than standard. My other option is to have the springs reset, any comments would be appreciated, cost is not an issue here.


Last edited by GT SALLY; 12-19-2009 at 05:47 PM.
GT SALLY is offline  
Old 12-19-2009, 07:08 PM
  #24  
kalli
6th Gear Member
 
kalli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Cork, Ireland
Posts: 6,417
Default

LOL talk about waking up a 100 year old post :-)
the signature below is 5leaf mid-eye

I believe mid-eye is the way to go, but the 5 are too stiff. and 4.5 won't make the car sit higher or lower than 5 mid eye
opt for 4.5 leaf. i just got the 5 as that was seller had in stock. i'm used to it by now but it's quite jerky in the back. well off the marks of comfortable

my front is still too high (waiting for me to get bored and do the shelby drop, i opt for february). front is currently stockish

Last edited by kalli; 12-19-2009 at 07:10 PM.
kalli is offline  
Old 12-20-2009, 02:29 AM
  #25  
super64
1st Gear Member
 
super64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 55
Default

On my '64 1/2, I have 5 leaf standard eye springs on the back with KYB Gas-a-Just shocks and a 5/8" sway bar.
Up front, I run 620 springs with 1" poly insulators, 1 5/8" Shelby drop with a Negative Wedge kit, Opentracker Street Ready UCAs, Roller LCAs and Roller spring perches. I do have OEM strut rods with Poly bushings, but will probably swap these out for aftermarket heim-joint style rods when I'm ready for a front end alignment. I should probably add that I roll on 17 x 8 Ultra 454s with 225/40s on the front and 255/40s out back. I may be purchasing some American Racing Shelbys in 17 x 7 for the front and 17 x 8s (or 9s) for the rear this spring.
I recently added Tin Man Fabrications subframe connectors. Love em!

When I went with the 5 leaf springs, I was told to go with 4s because the 5would be too harsh. But, my car rides beautifully with minimal lean in curves. I swap cars with my buddy who has a '94 set up for road racing-He'll tell you that my car rides great, but it drives nothing like any old car he's ever driven!
The cool thing about Mustangs, is that they could be spec'd to the buyer's intended use; anything from a dressed up six cylinder to a V8 muscle car. Now we get to do the same thing!
It depends on what you're trying to achieve. If you want your car to ride like a Caddy, Buy a Caddy. If you want it to be a lowrider, you can do the Air Ride and 20s. I was inspired by movies like "Bullitt" and watching Trans Am racing when I was a kid. Living in Colorado, a Canyon Carver is what I've built!
super64 is offline  
Old 12-20-2009, 07:34 PM
  #26  
Deviousfred
3rd Gear Member
 
Deviousfred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: El Paso, TX
Posts: 630
Default

620 springs cut 3/4 of a coil, relocated GW uppers, and 5-1/2 leaf mid eye springs out back. Definitely not a street friendly ride but it sure is fun when you start turning the wheel.

Deviousfred is offline  
Old 12-20-2009, 10:58 PM
  #27  
groho
4th Gear Member
 
groho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,195
Default

I picked up standard eye's from mustang+ and my back end was soooo far up in the air it looked pitiful, worse than air shocks. If money isn't a prob, get mid-eyes, and have them peened at a spring shop for about $50 to get the exact height. I've added 1/2" to mine instead of blocks, and it's the perfect rake with 620 1" drop in the front. btw, 4 1/2 leaf, very nice ride.
groho is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
67LimeCoupe
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
31
09-30-2015 04:46 PM
showoffzx2
4 Cylinder NA and Turbo
6
09-14-2015 08:40 PM
Ryan Fitzpatrick
New Member Area
3
09-14-2015 02:21 AM
Pyrate Dave
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
8
09-10-2015 07:30 PM
tj@steeda
Steeda Autosports
0
09-08-2015 11:50 AM



Quick Reply: rear springs: reverse eye? standard eye?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:31 AM.