Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

Heads and cam instead of crate 347!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-09-2009, 08:32 AM
  #11  
kalli
6th Gear Member
 
kalli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Cork, Ireland
Posts: 6,417
Default

ya just have to be careful about the break in and the oils you use. I don't see any point in converting to rollers with that spider if it's not a roller block.
as for the cam. if I hadn't got the rpm cam from edelbrock I probably would have thrown a 268 comp cams in there.
but there's no way to tell without knowing the rest of your setup. better open a new thread for that as otherwise this one gets confusing ....
kalli is offline  
Old 06-09-2009, 01:27 PM
  #12  
67mustang302
6th Gear Member
 
67mustang302's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: California
Posts: 10,468
Default

Flat tappet cams are pointless these days, unless you're trying to cheap out. Roller cams have no wear issues, get better mileage, make more power, have better street manners, better idle vacuum, and radically increase VE over flat tappet cams within the same rpm range. That's the reason the manufacturers moved away from flat tappet cams over 25 years go. The slightly increased cost over a flat tappet cam, even if you have to buy retrofit lifters, is more than made up for in engine performance. That and you don't have to worry about doing a voodoo rain dance during engine break in.
67mustang302 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GimpyHSHS
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
19
12-19-2023 01:12 PM
kevsgt
2005-2014 Mustangs
5
10-09-2015 10:12 PM
patchshaffer
Tuner Central
3
10-05-2015 02:24 PM
uedlose
The Racers Bench
4
10-01-2015 08:31 PM
Drastang
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
2
09-30-2015 03:48 AM



Quick Reply: Heads and cam instead of crate 347!!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:36 AM.