Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

Rank and pinion: powered or non-powered?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-19-2011, 03:03 PM
  #1  
stefke
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
stefke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: loenen, netherlands
Posts: 127
Default Rank and pinion: powered or non-powered?

I'm still in between choices. I want to build in one of those Rack and Pinion kits, but should i use the powered one or the non-powered one.

It's going in an 1970 coupe, that is under construction. It has a 5.0 HO engine in it eith an AOD tranny. I was planning on using front tires that are 225 in witdh. If i were to go for 1 with powered rack and pinion, i would like a more modern steerring pump. Any suggestion would be great.

Thanks,
Steffan
stefke is offline  
Old 01-19-2011, 06:20 PM
  #2  
PaulS
1st Gear Member
 
PaulS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Washington
Posts: 147
Default

Don't the power R&P steering kits come with pumps? They really haven't changed much in the last 40 years.
PaulS is offline  
Old 01-19-2011, 06:57 PM
  #3  
001mustang
3rd Gear Member
 
001mustang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: tn
Posts: 889
Default

I installed manual rack because less things to break/leak and less clutter.

I grew up driving manual steering so no big deal to me.

If you want it to steer like new car then must go power.

I set my new manual rack up w/ +4 Caster which I like.

Tracks firmly straight ahead on interstate.
001mustang is offline  
Old 01-21-2011, 06:30 AM
  #4  
stefke
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
stefke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: loenen, netherlands
Posts: 127
Default

A different question: Is it true that a non-powered rack and pinion kit steers (a bit) easier (lighter) on low speeds (parking or turning) than the original manual steerring?

I drive a 1966 coupe as a daily driver and this car doesn't have powersteerring. So i'm quite used to it after 2 years. If is does steer lighter than the original setup, then i'm going for a non-powered setup. It would make the engine bay look a lot cleaner.
stefke is offline  
Old 01-21-2011, 10:54 AM
  #5  
001mustang
3rd Gear Member
 
001mustang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: tn
Posts: 889
Default

My manual rack steered easier in parking lot than my worn out box at OEM caster settings. To be fair, a broken in rack should be compared to a rebuilt box w/ similar ratios. Box will likely return to center w/ less resistance than a tightly preloaded rack; that is why rack likes more caster. More caster increases steering effort and straight line stability. As rack breaks in, return to center improves and less caster is required. Some racks allow user to tinker w/ gear mesh preload while other racks discourage user tampering; warrenty risk.

Rack should last many years w/ litttle steering play.
If you ever watch Andy, you may wonder how long a box will last before steering wheel play sets in.
Not a fan of worn box steering wheel play.

I suspect most people would prefer power rack for drivability; including me.
I have so many things to maintain, I just don't wont the extra headache of maintaining power rack.

Last edited by 001mustang; 01-21-2011 at 11:06 AM.
001mustang is offline  
Old 01-21-2011, 06:34 PM
  #6  
eZ
5th Gear Member
 
eZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: So. California
Posts: 2,258
Default

I have heard on many occassion that the unisteer manual rack made it easier to steer that standard steering.

Nobody likes a worn out box!
eZ is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jrrhd73must
Classic Mustang General Discussion
2
10-02-2015 09:17 PM
KingRando
2005-2014 Mustangs
5
10-02-2015 08:06 AM
ChampInSD
5.0L GT S550 Tech
13
10-02-2015 04:55 AM
MustangForums Editor
General Tech
0
09-25-2015 06:58 PM



Quick Reply: Rank and pinion: powered or non-powered?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:47 PM.