Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

Weak Chassis ???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-06-2011, 12:31 PM
  #1  
unit91
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
unit91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 889
Exclamation Weak Chassis ???

Took a ride in a 67 convert that was being sold at a car show. My wife & I were in the back seat - I was on the driver's side. While we were riding around I noticed a squeak near the top edge of the driver's door. I put my finger between the door edge and the rear quarter panel and could feel movement between the two. After that I drove the car and my wife sat in the front with me, no one setting in the back, and there was no squeaking. I put my finger between the door and the rear qtr panel again and could not feel any movement between the two. I visually checked for frame damage/rust but didn't see any. Is this a weak frame issue, weak rear springs, etc.???
unit91 is offline  
Old 08-06-2011, 12:37 PM
  #2  
67mustang302
6th Gear Member
 
67mustang302's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: California
Posts: 10,468
Default

Or the door wasn't shut all the way.
67mustang302 is offline  
Old 08-06-2011, 03:11 PM
  #3  
2+2GT
6th Gear Member
 
2+2GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: PA
Posts: 5,232
Default

It is normal for the door gap to change very slightly while moving, since there is no upper striker on Mustangs. However, if the door gap pinches closed, it's a likely sign that the inner rockers are rusty and losing strength, and should be checked.
2+2GT is offline  
Old 08-06-2011, 04:28 PM
  #4  
Oxnard Montalvo
4th Gear Member
 
Oxnard Montalvo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 1984
Posts: 1,188
Default

Are you and your wife a "plus size" couple?
Kidding.
It's a big investment so it's worth getting a little dirty over...Lie on your back and look at the torque boxes and frame rails. Make sure the door to body gaps are even and there's no visible body sag.
As said, some movement is normal, it' going to flex.
Oxnard Montalvo is offline  
Old 08-06-2011, 07:02 PM
  #5  
unit91
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
unit91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 889
Default

What's a striker?
unit91 is offline  
Old 08-06-2011, 07:10 PM
  #6  
2+2GT
6th Gear Member
 
2+2GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: PA
Posts: 5,232
Default

The DOR390 and DOR392 are striker wedges that keep the top of the door gap from closing when the body flexes. Mustangs don't have these.

2+2GT is offline  
Old 08-06-2011, 08:00 PM
  #7  
MustangFTW
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

convertibles have less support then coupes too, since they have no roof to hold it together as good.
 
Old 08-06-2011, 09:44 PM
  #8  
JMD
6th Gear Member
 
JMD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: AR
Posts: 5,469
Default

Originally Posted by MustangFTW
convertibles have less support then coupes too, since they have no roof to hold it together as good.

IMO, this PROBABLY explains everything.....

A certain amount of flex in these cars is just going to happen. Subframe connectors would probably help some though.
JMD is offline  
Old 08-07-2011, 01:53 AM
  #9  
scottybaccus
2nd Gear Member
 
scottybaccus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 486
Default

it's called cowl shake. The cowl forward (including door hinges and anything hanging on them) shimmys from side to side in the opposite direction as the rear quarters. All this twist is going on in the floor pan and rockers. Very normal for a convertible, even today. They usually beef up the undercarriage of a convertible to minimize this, but I've never seen one any bigger than a Miata that was without any shake at all.

Subframe connectors and an X brace added to the space between the rear wheel houses is a big help, but not likely to rid all of it.
scottybaccus is offline  
Old 08-07-2011, 08:41 AM
  #10  
2+2GT
6th Gear Member
 
2+2GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: PA
Posts: 5,232
Default

The Mustang had "cowl shake" when introduced. In mid-65, tubular braces were added.

A Mustang convertible with solid, or freshly replaced, structure is quite firm. Most are in some stage of deterioration, and rust-thinned steel isn't very stiff.

Convertibles had a LOT of extra bracing. Front torque boxes, inner rockers, one-piece seat platforms, lower seat platforms, B pillar braces, rear seat braces, transition panel brace, even the rear crossmember was doubled.

Subframe connectors were mentioned. Think of inner rockers as The Subframe Connectors From Hell. No subframe connector I have ever seen even comes close to the strength of the inner rocker.

Any Mustang that's not a trailer queen should have an export brace. And not the cheap crappy one, either, the thick, deeply stamped repro.

Last edited by 2+2GT; 08-07-2011 at 08:43 AM.
2+2GT is offline  


Quick Reply: Weak Chassis ???



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:49 AM.