Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

302 crank and rods in a 289? looking for 400+ hp?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-11-2012, 03:26 PM
  #21  
Service Tech
 
Service Tech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Georgia
Posts: 4
Default

you can get 400 hp from a 302, its just costly. IMO, i like the comp cams extreme energy 272. i had one in a 302. it has a 110 lobe seperation and sounds great as well as performs great. 400 horse is asking alot from the 5.0 but it can be done. get a good set of heads. AFR 185 or 195 is a good start.
Service Tech is offline  
Old 11-11-2012, 03:53 PM
  #22  
rmodel65
Yukon Cornelius
 
rmodel65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: deep in the heart of dixie GEORGIA
Posts: 11,808
Default

you can get 400 hp out of 165's...185 and large you gotta cut the pistons for valve clearance
rmodel65 is offline  
Old 11-11-2012, 06:43 PM
  #23  
Service Tech
 
Service Tech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Georgia
Posts: 4
Default

agreed...
Service Tech is offline  
Old 11-11-2012, 08:37 PM
  #24  
frdnut
2nd Gear Member
 
frdnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Ontario
Posts: 493
Default

The older (28 oz balanced) stock 302 cranks can handle quite a bit of power and some serious rpms....I know of a guy on another forum that ran somewhere around 9000 rpms on a stock 302 crank in a drag car..You can get 400hp from 302 cubes fairly easy these days with any of the good aftermarket heads..The original RHS heads you chose are very good heads as well...
frdnut is offline  
Old 11-11-2012, 11:05 PM
  #25  
Zimbo
Thread Starter
 
Zimbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Missouri
Posts: 30
Default

so the 28 oz is the one I want? I don't want the engine to shake itself apart!
Zimbo is offline  
Old 11-11-2012, 11:28 PM
  #26  
rmodel65
Yukon Cornelius
 
rmodel65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: deep in the heart of dixie GEORGIA
Posts: 11,808
Default

anything 1982 and newer should be 50oz and everything 1981 and older is 28oz. if you order an all new crank you can pick if you want 28 or 50 normally.. factory for your 66 is 28oz
rmodel65 is offline  
Old 11-12-2012, 12:16 AM
  #27  
toybreaker
2nd Gear Member
 
toybreaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Guam
Posts: 173
Default

If you are going to go the stroker route do not piece it together.

Look at ALL the KIT options. Buy a COMPLETE stroker assembly from a reputable vendor/manufacturer. It will all be there crank/rods/pistons/rings/bearings, all you have to do is take the block and the kit down to your automotive machine shop of choice and tell them to bore/hone/clearance for your reciprocating assembly and when they call you take it home, clean it 2 or 3 times and assemble it.

I went for the same thing as you. "around 400hp at the crank" but I used world products cast iron heads. I have $1200 in the top end of my engine including the cam, rockers and push rods. (not all bought new obviously)
toybreaker is offline  
Old 11-15-2012, 09:15 AM
  #28  
kenash
2nd Gear Member
 
kenash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location:
Posts: 356
Default

Originally Posted by Zimbo
so the 28 oz is the one I want? I don't want the engine to shake itself apart!

You do know "balancing" an engine whether it be 28/50 will preclude it "shaking itself apart"? Not to mention, attention to detail during assembly phase, as in "blue printing" the tolerances. Have you researched "Scat" products.
Good Luck!
kenash is offline  
Old 01-17-2018, 12:08 AM
  #29  
drewsky
3rd Gear Member
 
drewsky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Arizona
Posts: 887
Default

It can be done or at least close to 400 to the crank. But it would be maxed out and almost non street able at that point. Edelbrock performer rpm heads would help a lot with long tube or try y headers. I don’t think you will get 400 out of the E street kit. I have 385 hp and 420 tq to the crank on my 331 stroker with E street heads and other performance bolt ons. So that will not happen with a 289 to be realistic. Cobra automotive by Curt Vogt sells a 500 hp 289 but it’s 35,000 bones! So that should give you a good idea of what it will take. Stoke it to a 331 or 347 and it’s doable and street driveable. My 331 has a 289-302 fireing order and badged as a 289 under the hood. Nobody would know if I didn’t tell them it’s stroked.

Last edited by drewsky; 01-17-2018 at 12:10 AM.
drewsky is offline  
Old 01-18-2018, 08:11 AM
  #30  
MonsterBilly
4th Gear Member
 
MonsterBilly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Goodyear, AZ
Posts: 1,674
Default

Originally Posted by toybreaker
If you are going to go the stroker route do not piece it together.

Look at ALL the KIT options. Buy a COMPLETE stroker assembly from a reputable vendor/manufacturer. It will all be there crank/rods/pistons/rings/bearings, all you have to do is take the block and the kit down to your automotive machine shop of choice and tell them to bore/hone/clearance for your reciprocating assembly and when they call you take it home, clean it 2 or 3 times and assemble it.

I went for the same thing as you. "around 400hp at the crank" but I used world products cast iron heads. I have $1200 in the top end of my engine including the cam, rockers and push rods. (not all bought new obviously)
This is very true. Buy an assembled kit. And from my knowledge, most all stroker kits are 28 oz imbalance. Unless it is a very high dollar kit which sometimes use a zero oz imbalance.
MonsterBilly is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bradleyb
Classic Mustangs (Tech)
3
11-27-2015 07:50 PM
jrrhd73must
Classic Mustang General Discussion
2
10-02-2015 09:17 PM
bradleyb
California Regional Chapter
0
10-01-2015 01:02 AM
UrS4
S197 Handling Section
1
09-30-2015 10:13 AM
mustangheaven
General Tech
2
09-29-2015 11:00 AM



Quick Reply: 302 crank and rods in a 289? looking for 400+ hp?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:30 PM.