Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

Retro Fit Roller Cam

Old 12-04-2010, 03:42 PM
  #1  
mpa5008
Thread Starter
 
mpa5008's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 6
Default Retro Fit Roller Cam

Hey guys, I was hoping you could help with figure out what options are available for my '68 289.

I'm in the process of rebuilding the original engine, I was planning on replacing the stock heads with edelbrock performer aluminum heads. I've been trying to figure out what roller cams are available for this engine that would work well with these heads. I have talked with summit techs and they recommended a setup from comp cams. I was wondering if anyone had any experience switching from hydraulic flat tappet to a hydraulic roller cam and could point me in the right direction. I was hoping to go with an Isky cam however they don't offer anything for the 289. Apart from Isky and Comp Cams, what companies would you recommend that have a roller setup available for a 289 or do you think Comp Cams is the best option?

Thanks
mpa5008 is offline  
Old 12-04-2010, 06:30 PM
  #2  
69mach1377
5th Gear Member
 
69mach1377's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: ABQ, NM, USA
Posts: 2,593
Default

Comp Cams all the way...free bump.
69mach1377 is offline  
Old 12-04-2010, 06:37 PM
  #3  
JMD
6th Gear Member
 
JMD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: AR
Posts: 5,469
Default

You will need a reduced base circle cam in order to put a roller cam into a non roller 289 block. I don't know for sure but Comp cams may be your only option for one.

But, they used to have plenty of options, and I like their cams.

My son is running a retro fit kit in his 69 block, I can't find a downside, the install was simple enough, we had to CAREFULLY drill and tap 2 shallow 1/4" holes in the valley to attach the "spider", (super easy if the cam bearings are not in, a little more "delicate" when they are in though).

Some say that the tops of the lifter bores need to be cleaned up with a die grinder for the bones to lay down right, but we didn't need to do this.
JMD is offline  
Old 12-04-2010, 07:56 PM
  #4  
BuckeyeDemon
2nd Gear Member
 
BuckeyeDemon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Ohio
Posts: 315
Default

i'm pretty sure you don't have to use a reduced base circle cam to use a roller in a non-roller 289. it just requires link bar lifters that cost a little more.

maybe i'm wrong about the 289. i'm using a non-reduced base circle roller in my 69 351W and not using a retro fit kit.
BuckeyeDemon is offline  
Old 12-04-2010, 08:02 PM
  #5  
67mustang302
6th Gear Member
 
67mustang302's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: California
Posts: 10,468
Default

Email Ed Curtis at Flowtech Induction and let him know what you need. He'll set you up with a custom ground hyd roller for your car that works in your block, and will answer all your questions. It's $325 for the cam, which is only marginally more or the same as an ots grind from Comp, but you'll get better performance.
67mustang302 is offline  
Old 12-05-2010, 12:01 AM
  #6  
htwheelz67
3rd Gear Member
 
htwheelz67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location:
Posts: 572
Default

you can do it two ways, reduced base circle cam and stock lifters, dogbones and spyder OR regular stock hyd roller cam and the expensive link bar lifters, the link bar lifters are also much more of a high performance style lifter (comp cams). You can also get many more off the shelf cams using the link bar lifters vs the reduced base circle cams. It is definetly worth the swap though either way you do it.
htwheelz67 is offline  
Old 12-05-2010, 09:51 AM
  #7  
JMD
6th Gear Member
 
JMD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: AR
Posts: 5,469
Default

I should have mentioned that when I was pricing stuff out, a roller swap could be done with bars and links w/ no reduced base circle cam for about twice the cost of a retrofit kit.

It has been a couple of years ago since I priced one of these though, might not be so bad now.

I was under the impression that I was getting linked lifters when I bought the first retrofit kit, but in spite of my initial disappointment, the first one worked out so well that I made the decision to go with the "retro fit" again, (mainly for financial considerations) on the second 408.
JMD is offline  
Old 12-05-2010, 11:54 AM
  #8  
69mach1377
5th Gear Member
 
69mach1377's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: ABQ, NM, USA
Posts: 2,593
Default

Originally Posted by BuckeyeDemon
i'm pretty sure you don't have to use a reduced base circle cam to use a roller in a non-roller 289. it just requires link bar lifters that cost a little more.

maybe i'm wrong about the 289. i'm using a non-reduced base circle roller in my 69 351W and not using a retro fit kit.
Can you elaborate on your setup, BD?
69mach1377 is offline  
Old 12-05-2010, 03:58 PM
  #9  
JMD
6th Gear Member
 
JMD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: AR
Posts: 5,469
Default

http://www.summitracing.com/search/D...s/?Ns=Rank|Asc

With these, there is no spider and bones needed.
JMD is offline  
Old 12-05-2010, 04:21 PM
  #10  
BuckeyeDemon
2nd Gear Member
 
BuckeyeDemon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Ohio
Posts: 315
Default

Originally Posted by 69mach1377
Can you elaborate on your setup, BD?
ok. nothing special

69 351W non roller block

comp cam billet hydraulic roller
morel link bar lifters

no dogbones, no spiders

620 lift
236/244 duration
150 lbs on the seat

I think the lifters were about $400. Pricey.

is this the info you were interested in or were you looking for something else? thanks.


Last edited by BuckeyeDemon; 12-05-2010 at 04:31 PM.
BuckeyeDemon is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Retro Fit Roller Cam



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:42 PM.