Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

any difference in 289 vs. 302 heads

Old 02-15-2016, 11:19 PM
  #1  
MonsterBilly
4th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
MonsterBilly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Goodyear, AZ
Posts: 1,674
Default any difference in 289 vs. 302 heads

I have a set of 289 h a ads from my mustang. They have been ported and have screw in studs with guide plates and a recent valve job with some good solid springs.

I picked up a 75 bronco with a 302 which is bone stock. It has a 2bl carb. I also have an extra 60pcfm edelbrock carb and a brand new intake. So I was thinking, if I'm gonna put the carb and I take in, why not put on the 289 heads that have been worked over?

Please gimme your thoughts
MonsterBilly is offline  
Old 02-16-2016, 03:49 PM
  #2  
groho
4th Gear Member
 
groho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,195
Default

does your 75 heads have a air injection ports? that was pretty standard back the early 70's.
groho is offline  
Old 02-16-2016, 06:06 PM
  #3  
barnett468
4th Gear Member
 
barnett468's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: arizona
Posts: 1,398
Default

The 289 heads should have smaller combustion chambers of 54 cc . You will need premium gas and will need to curve the distributor for optimum timing.

If the 302 has flat top pistons, you should check the deck height of the pistons and use a thinner head gasket if necessary to get the quench/squish clearance between .043" and .034".
barnett468 is offline  
Old 02-16-2016, 09:17 PM
  #4  
MonsterBilly
4th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
MonsterBilly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Goodyear, AZ
Posts: 1,674
Default

I'm not sure if they have air ports. It did have a smog pump which has since been removed if that is any in inclination

I have not taken the intake and heads off of the 75 yet. It runs fine I just have the stuff laying around so I thought what the hell. I also have a new set of roller rockers as well so I may as well get a cam.
MonsterBilly is offline  
Old 02-17-2016, 06:36 AM
  #5  
fastbackford351
Foghorn Leghorn
 
fastbackford351's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: I reside in a near constant state of amazment.
Posts: 2,923
Default

If you have a set of bone stock 75 302 heads vs. some worked over 289 heads, I'd find it hard to believe that the 289 heads wouldn't be a better setup all the way around. By 75 Ford heads were so pitifully choked back, especially on the exhaust ports that they were a bad joke for making power.

I'm usually a guy who subscribes to the "if it ain't broke don't fix it" mantra but in this case, I think I'd make that swap.
fastbackford351 is offline  
Old 02-19-2016, 02:13 AM
  #6  
rmodel65
Yukon Cornelius
 
rmodel65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: deep in the heart of dixie GEORGIA
Posts: 11,808
Default

sell all those heads and get some heads from a 96-97.5 explorer...then youll have gt40 heads that outflow all stock 289/302/351w heads even the c9 and d0 351w heads
rmodel65 is offline  
Old 02-20-2016, 03:03 PM
  #7  
crazyJak
 
crazyJak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: OK
Posts: 4
Default

Hello, new member logging on for first time. I remember putting 351W heads on a 302, after having them milled down to restore the comp ratio. The 351 had bigger valves. You had to use a certain head gasket to allow water flow. Anyone know if this would work on 289s?
crazyJak is offline  
Old 02-21-2016, 02:27 PM
  #8  
rmodel65
Yukon Cornelius
 
rmodel65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: deep in the heart of dixie GEORGIA
Posts: 11,808
Default

yes..but gt40 heads from a 96-97.5 ford explorer outflow the 351w heads from 1969-1970 and already have hardened valve seats. and you can find them all day long for 100$ or less at the local pull a part place..
rmodel65 is offline  
Old 02-21-2016, 04:18 PM
  #9  
69mach1377
5th Gear Member
 
69mach1377's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: ABQ, NM, USA
Posts: 2,593
Default

^Don't those require special exhaust manifolds or headers?
69mach1377 is offline  
Old 02-21-2016, 05:07 PM
  #10  
barnett468
4th Gear Member
 
barnett468's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: arizona
Posts: 1,398
Default

Originally Posted by 69mach1377
^Don't those require special exhaust manifolds or headers?
not the gt40's . the gt40p heads sometimes require short spark plugs and ceramic boots, but most headers will fit them.
barnett468 is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: any difference in 289 vs. 302 heads



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:16 PM.