Steeda tri-ax v.s. mgw
11-16-2006, 01:11 PM
#11
I ♥ Acer
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location:
Posts: 48
RE: Steeda tri-ax v.s. mgw
The Steeda Tri-Ax and all others like it are junk.
The MGW is a step up but is still very " pieced " together.
I tried these shifters plus others in my 2003 GT and found the B&M ripper to be better than all of them.
A real sport shifter doesn't use a POS 4" tall stick and should feel smooth not notchy.
The MGW is a step up but is still very " pieced " together.
I tried these shifters plus others in my 2003 GT and found the B&M ripper to be better than all of them.
A real sport shifter doesn't use a POS 4" tall stick and should feel smooth not notchy.
11-16-2006, 03:58 PM
#12
Retired MF Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,891
RE: Steeda tri-ax v.s. mgw
ORIGINAL: cody6.0
The Steeda Tri-Ax and all others like it are junk.
The MGW is a step up but is still very " pieced " together.
I tried these shifters plus others in my 2003 GT and found the B&M ripper to be better than all of them.
A real sport shifter doesn't use a POS 4" tall stick and should feel smooth not notchy.
The Steeda Tri-Ax and all others like it are junk.
The MGW is a step up but is still very " pieced " together.
I tried these shifters plus others in my 2003 GT and found the B&M ripper to be better than all of them.
A real sport shifter doesn't use a POS 4" tall stick and should feel smooth not notchy.
mine was a pain to use at first, shifts like butter and never misses third now that it's broken in.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mungodrums
S550 2015-2023 Mustang
10
09-28-2015 10:54 PM
tj@steeda
Steeda Autosports
0
09-24-2015 09:18 PM
tj@steeda
Steeda Autosports
0
09-16-2015 07:53 PM