1998 or 1992 a decision.
#13
1998 or 1992 a decision.
I kinda agree with vfast on the price. It seems a little high. I found my '91 for $3K. It had a few more miles on it than that one though. But with the same options. It didn't have any performance parts, but had new alternator, brakes, ac clutch, radiator fan, MAF, all put on right before I bought. This car wasn't driven in the winter either. Virtually no rust and in perfect condition inside and out. I'd look around a bit more for some other '91-'93's. If you are good a jewing, and really want the car,talk to the guy and see what he'll come down to. On the other side of things, I'd rather have the 92 5.0 over a newer V6 mustang. I think they'll hold their value much better in the future.
#15
1998 or 1992 a decision.
Just a question Why buy something just to store it? Why not buy one later on when you do not need to beg your dad to give you the go and get one when you become your own man and will be able to drive the s**t out of it. Belive me there are plenty of them out there and many for less than that in just as good of condition.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
treesloth
New Member Area
4
09-28-2015 07:03 AM
mrappe
V6 (1994-2004) Mustangs
0
09-26-2015 10:16 AM
schecterplayer
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
3
09-23-2015 08:38 AM