MustangForums.com

General Tech Ask model specific questions in the appropriate category below. All other general questions within.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: DashLynx

[Deleted]

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-14-2003, 04:50 AM
  #1  
Deleted User
I ♥ Acer
Thread Starter
 
Deleted User's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,638
Default [Deleted]
[Deleted by Admins]
Deleted User is offline  
Reply
Old 12-14-2003, 05:14 AM
  #2  
Quik
6th Gear Member
 
Quik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 5,182
Default 90 5.0 VS. 97 GT
the fox body your alot heavier and slower.
Quik is offline  
Reply
Old 12-14-2003, 06:38 AM
  #3  
Dan04COBRA
Super Moderator
 
Dan04COBRA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location:
Posts: 14,917
Default 90 5.0 VS. 97 GT


Originally Posted by ohsoquik02
the fox body your alot heavier and slower.
</P>


Anything can happen, remember? You fought this one with me pretty hard, I was kind of suprised to see you give this guy a real answer!</P>


Sorry to hijack your thread like this, but I'm only pointing out how large of a hypocrite this guy is! The 5.0 should put a couple cars on you considering he can drive his 5 speed. <IMG src=smileys/smiley2.gif border="0">Start modding!</P>
Dan04COBRA is offline  
Reply
Old 12-14-2003, 12:08 PM
  #4  
karma279
2nd Gear Member
 
karma279's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 190
Default 90 5.0 VS. 97 GT
Yeah... You will lose. Not to bash, but '97 was a horrible year. Unless his 50 is a POS, he will get at least a couple cars on you.
karma279 is offline  
Reply
Old 12-14-2003, 01:11 PM
  #5  
97FordGT
1st Gear Member
 
97FordGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 97
Default 90 5.0 VS. 97 GT
Originally Posted by karma279
Yeah... You will lose. Not to bash, but '97 was a horrible year. Unless his 50 is a POS, he will get at least a couple cars on you.
i dont understand why everyone says that 97 is a bad year. i guess just because it doesnt have PI heads. i drive the hell outta my car and have had no problems
97FordGT is offline  
Reply
Old 12-14-2003, 03:09 PM
  #6  
Jugador1
I ♥ Acer
 
Jugador1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 2,963
Default 90 5.0 VS. 97 GT
they weigh a lot but the engine wasnt hopped enough to make up for the weight
Jugador1 is offline  
Reply
Old 12-14-2003, 03:37 PM
  #7  
Deleted User
I ♥ Acer
Thread Starter
 
Deleted User's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,638
Default [Deleted]
[Deleted by Admins]
Deleted User is offline  
Reply
Old 12-14-2003, 03:39 PM
  #8  
Jugador1
I ♥ Acer
 
Jugador1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 2,963
Default 90 5.0 VS. 97 GT


weight differernce isnt that much i dont think butthe new modelhas the PI heads</P><edited><editID>Jugador</editID><editDate>37969.5694791667</editDate></edited>
Jugador1 is offline  
Reply
Old 12-14-2003, 03:47 PM
  #9  
Deleted User
I ♥ Acer
Thread Starter
 
Deleted User's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,638
Default [Deleted]
[Deleted by Admins]
Deleted User is offline  
Reply
Old 12-14-2003, 04:07 PM
  #10  
Quik
6th Gear Member
 
Quik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 5,182
Default 90 5.0 VS. 97 GT
your body style is heavier then the fox. and your motor lacks the hp. the new ones have different heads and i think a revised intake.
Quik is offline  
Reply



Advanced Search
Quick Reply: [Deleted]


Reply Closed Thread Share
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:11 AM.