CAI vs stock airbox...
#12
RE: CAI vs stock airbox...
I think the only thing you have to worry about, with having a CAI, is if you live in a very dusty, dry area(like I do), as the aftermarket filter isn't as restricted as the stock filter. This is easily taken care of though, by oiling or changing your filter on a more regular basis.
#13
RE: CAI vs stock airbox...
ORIGINAL: 05SonicBlue
Peak Horsepower: 286 (25hp gain)
Peak Torque: 302 (20-lb-ft gain)
these numbers are exactly what i got in my car after the C&L and custom tune, 286 / 302, so in my experience it's not BS
Peak Horsepower: 286 (25hp gain)
Peak Torque: 302 (20-lb-ft gain)
these numbers are exactly what i got in my car after the C&L and custom tune, 286 / 302, so in my experience it's not BS
The article was informative however... but they seemed to get quite a bit less out of the stock box than praztec did, however, I dont know the differences in elevation and testing temperatures either so theres a lot of variables in there that could throw the comparison off.
#14
RE: CAI vs stock airbox...
ORIGINAL: solutionsix
The article was informative however... but they seemed to get quite a bit less out of the stock box than praztec did, however, I dont know the differences in elevation and testing temperatures either so theres a lot of variables in there that could throw the comparison off.
The article was informative however... but they seemed to get quite a bit less out of the stock box than praztec did, however, I dont know the differences in elevation and testing temperatures either so theres a lot of variables in there that could throw the comparison off.
the thing is, i think the stock air box looks like crap and any intake kit looks better than the stock intake. plus, you get more engine noise with an intake (another plus in my book) and the tune that is necessary when putting on an intake gets rid of a lot of the lack luster throttle issues people talk about, making the car much more fun to drive.
#15
RE: CAI vs stock airbox...
Agree with you there, you do get a bit more to look at with an intake rather than the... fairly large and unappealing airbox. And the sound, yes... thats another plus for me. I like the intake sound once you throw on a cone filter -- especially on a turbo car </wishful thinking>
#16
RE: CAI vs stock airbox...
Don't aftermarket intakes increase the diameter of the MAF housing?
The removal of this bottle-neck in the intake may net a +5-10hp difference over stock. I remember reading an article someone wrote while doing R&D for an intake (C&L?) that compared the stock intake with tune vs their intake with tune on the same dyno...it's been a while (2005), but you may can Google it still. If I remember correctly, the C&L(?) netted about 5whp over stock, and the writer seemed flustered and blamed the low number on the air/engine temps. Another article I read said the C&L (specifically) was subject to major heat soak in slow traffic due to the aluminum construction.
My opinion...I don't think an intake (or throttle body for that matter) will make too much of a difference without some more agressive cams. Stock can only consume so much air.
If you don't like the looks of the stock airbox, you could fit a cone filter on the end of the stock intake tube.
The removal of this bottle-neck in the intake may net a +5-10hp difference over stock. I remember reading an article someone wrote while doing R&D for an intake (C&L?) that compared the stock intake with tune vs their intake with tune on the same dyno...it's been a while (2005), but you may can Google it still. If I remember correctly, the C&L(?) netted about 5whp over stock, and the writer seemed flustered and blamed the low number on the air/engine temps. Another article I read said the C&L (specifically) was subject to major heat soak in slow traffic due to the aluminum construction.
My opinion...I don't think an intake (or throttle body for that matter) will make too much of a difference without some more agressive cams. Stock can only consume so much air.
If you don't like the looks of the stock airbox, you could fit a cone filter on the end of the stock intake tube.
#17
RE: CAI vs stock airbox...
I agree with you there. I cant see the intake netting any large gains in HP without the motor being able to actually use the air its pulling through a larger diameter tube. If in fact the tube was too small for the motor originally from the factory (however I cant see that being too frequent of a case) or the surface area of the filter or inlet to the airbox was too little... yeah an intake would improve the gains. After my once-over on the stock mustang airbox, it seems fairly well designed and efficient to me, but... of course... complete untested opinion there.
If I do end up ordering an intake sometime and go throw my car on my buddy's dyno, I'll do some before and after tests and try and keep them as close to fair as possible.
If I do end up ordering an intake sometime and go throw my car on my buddy's dyno, I'll do some before and after tests and try and keep them as close to fair as possible.
#18
RE: CAI vs stock airbox...
ORIGINAL: 05SonicBlue
yes, there are a lot of variables that can affect the numbers (temp, humidity, altitude, accuracy of the dyno, etc.) so i think a few HP diff when comparing results is essentially not a meaningful difference.
the thing is, i think the stock air box looks like crap and any intake kit looks better than the stock intake. plus, you get more engine noise with an intake (another plus in my book) and the tune that is necessary when putting on an intake gets rid of a lot of the lack luster throttle issues people talk about, making the car much more fun to drive.
ORIGINAL: solutionsix
The article was informative however... but they seemed to get quite a bit less out of the stock box than praztec did, however, I dont know the differences in elevation and testing temperatures either so theres a lot of variables in there that could throw the comparison off.
The article was informative however... but they seemed to get quite a bit less out of the stock box than praztec did, however, I dont know the differences in elevation and testing temperatures either so theres a lot of variables in there that could throw the comparison off.
the thing is, i think the stock air box looks like crap and any intake kit looks better than the stock intake. plus, you get more engine noise with an intake (another plus in my book) and the tune that is necessary when putting on an intake gets rid of a lot of the lack luster throttle issues people talk about, making the car much more fun to drive.
+1 to everything you said.
#20
RE: CAI vs stock airbox...
ORIGINAL: SOLDSHORT
so bottom line is most of the HP just comes from having a good tune?
so bottom line is most of the HP just comes from having a good tune?
Again... untested and undocumented opinion here so ... flame away if anyone loves the intakes
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post