Notices
GT S197 General Discussion This section is for technical discussions pertaining specifically to the V8 variation of the 2005 and newer Ford Mustang.

Queston about 4.6L cam install

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-23-2006, 09:29 AM
  #11  
ScreamingYellow
2nd Gear Member
 
ScreamingYellow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location:
Posts: 184
Default RE: Queston about 4.6L cam install

My understanding is that the cams will be worth 20 - 30 whp. As mentioned above though, no one has done any comparisons or shown me any dyno graphs, so until then I'll be patient. For 1100 dollars you could safely put a 125 shot of Nitrous on... and have enough money to fill your bottle for a long while.

However, I can't imagine 400whp N/A. If you had 4.3's, LT's, o/r X, Intake w/custom tune for 100 Octane, Wild Cams, UDP's, Electric water pump, I would think you might be able to see 340whp... Not sure where that other 60 would come from.
ScreamingYellow is offline  
Old 06-23-2006, 09:55 AM
  #12  
CrazyAl
5th Gear Member
 
CrazyAl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location:
Posts: 2,544
Default RE: Queston about 4.6L cam install

I think it might be possible to hit 400 RWHP naturally aspirated but it would take the standard bolt-ons, head work, cams, and I think it would require boring/stroking the motor.

By the way, gears such as 4.30's have no affect on your RWHP. All they do is move the torque curve around--they don't change the actual power output of the engine.
CrazyAl is offline  
Old 06-23-2006, 10:25 AM
  #13  
QuickShortBus
I ♥ Acer
 
QuickShortBus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Concord, NC
Posts: 1,278
Default RE: Queston about 4.6L cam install

ORIGINAL: CrazyAl
By the way, gears such as 4.30's have no affect on your RWHP. All they do is move the torque curve around--they don't change the actual power output of the engine.
Actually your torque curve remains unchanged as that is set by the components of the engine. All the rear gears do is change the number of revolutions the motor has to make to turn the rear wheels one time.
QuickShortBus is offline  
Old 06-23-2006, 10:36 AM
  #14  
CrazyAl
5th Gear Member
 
CrazyAl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location:
Posts: 2,544
Default RE: Queston about 4.6L cam install

Sorry, I wasn't clear. The torque curve of the ENGINE is unchanged. However, at the rear wheels you are moving it lower down in the RPM range (RPM of the AXLE), becasue the engine is making more revs per turn of the axle.
CrazyAl is offline  
Old 06-23-2006, 10:37 AM
  #15  
QuickShortBus
I ♥ Acer
 
QuickShortBus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Concord, NC
Posts: 1,278
Default RE: Queston about 4.6L cam install

Another thing to consider is the cost to power factor, for heads and cams you are looking at about $2500 plus $300 in gaskets, might as well do head studs while you're there so another $200 so you are already at $3000. $800 for long tubes, $200 for a H/X-pipe, $550 for a cat-back, $350 for an eH2O pump, $300 for a good damper, $250 for a CAI, light weight flywheel and clutch (your going to need it) $1200, an aluminum driveshaft $600 and a custom tune $500.

So we are up to $7750 and you MIGHT see 400rwhp if all of the stars are aligned correctly. This is assuming you can do all of the work yourself and I would strongly reccomend getting a shop to do the heads & cams so that's another $500 (low balling it, probably will be more).

Now you can get a turbo from PowerHouse and make the numbers seen in my signature for $5495 COMPLETE nothing else to buy and you can install it yourself or pay a shop about $1000 to do it for you. That leaves you with enough extra money to do the rear suspension.
QuickShortBus is offline  
Old 06-23-2006, 12:01 PM
  #16  
CrazyAl
5th Gear Member
 
CrazyAl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location:
Posts: 2,544
Default RE: Queston about 4.6L cam install

Yeah, the turbo pack (or a SC) definatley seems to be better bang for the buck. However, a few points:

1) You will need the clutch, driveshaft, when you get to that kind of HP level no matter how you do it. I don't think that the Turbo/SC kits come with that, so that is not a fair thing to be including the in the price of the NA buildup, unless you also add it to the Turbo kit.

2) If you build up a motor, with aftermarket head work, new valvetrain components (springs, etc.), studs, and so forth you've got a stronger motor than you would otherwise. (This is especially true if you go the extra mile and do your pistons, rods, and/or crankshaft) A stock engine with a power adder still has the limitations of the stock engine.
CrazyAl is offline  
Old 06-23-2006, 12:07 PM
  #17  
QuickShortBus
I ♥ Acer
 
QuickShortBus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Concord, NC
Posts: 1,278
Default RE: Queston about 4.6L cam install

ORIGINAL: CrazyAl
Yeah, the turbo pack (or a SC) definatley seems to be better bang for the buck. However, a few points:

1) You will need the clutch, driveshaft, when you get to that kind of HP level no matter how you do it. I don't think that the Turbo/SC kits come with that, so that is not a fair thing to be including the in the price of the NA buildup, unless you also add it to the Turbo kit.

2) If you build up a motor, with aftermarket head work, new valvetrain components (springs, etc.), studs, and so forth you've got a stronger motor than you would otherwise. (This is especially true if you go the extra mile and do your pistons, rods, and/or crankshaft) A stock engine with a power adder still has the limitations of the stock engine.
The primary reasons I included them in the n/a build list is because the lighter weight flywheel and driveshaft will allow more hp to find it's way to the wheels, they are not necessary unless you are going to be running sticky tires at the dragstrip with forced induction.

Yes by upgrading the top end of the motor it will make for a better overall motor, however at 425-450rwhp it is very possible for a stock motor to last a long time and you won't be spinning it as hard as you would with a n/a setup.

N/A would require 7000 rpms to make that kind of power so the stock bottom end is going to give up sooner due to how hard it is being turned.
QuickShortBus is offline  
Old 06-23-2006, 06:50 PM
  #18  
Tmack
2nd Gear Member
 
Tmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location:
Posts: 158
Default RE: Queston about 4.6L cam install

Everyone is talking about the benefits of a cam swap on a N/A motor. What are the benefits on a S/C motor? Are there any? I would like to do a cam swap not for added performance, but for the more aggressive exhaust note. Don't know if it is worth the money though. By fall I should have 475hp at the crank so more hp is not that important too me.
Tmack is offline  
Old 06-23-2006, 06:57 PM
  #19  
QuickShortBus
I ♥ Acer
 
QuickShortBus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Concord, NC
Posts: 1,278
Default RE: Queston about 4.6L cam install

ORIGINAL: Tmack

Everyone is talking about the benefits of a cam swap on a N/A motor. What are the benefits on a S/C motor? Are there any? I would like to do a cam swap not for added performance, but for the more aggressive exhaust note. Don't know if it is worth the money though. By fall I should have 475hp at the crank so more hp is not that important too me.
Yes, cams help on forced induction also.
QuickShortBus is offline  
Old 06-23-2006, 07:24 PM
  #20  
05SonicBlue
2nd Gear Member
 
05SonicBlue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 295
Default RE: Queston about 4.6L cam install


ORIGINAL: 1QuickShortBus


Warranty issues - If you are looking at doing cams this is probably a minor issue.


so funny and so true . . .
05SonicBlue is offline  


Quick Reply: Queston about 4.6L cam install



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:31 AM.