Notices
GT S197 General Discussion This section is for technical discussions pertaining specifically to the V8 variation of the 2005 and newer Ford Mustang.

Maybe backpressure isn't so bad

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-15-2006, 01:45 AM
  #21  
swensicle
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
swensicle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location:
Posts: 413
Default RE: Maybe backpressure isn't so bad

Well, regardless of what the dyno might say, or however many people avoid where the torque curve lies, there is no doubt that my car has suffered a power loss. I'll be re-routing the new tips tomorrow and will report any changes after that.
swensicle is offline  
Old 09-16-2006, 12:54 AM
  #22  
Triisomy21
4th Gear Member
 
Triisomy21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,052
Default RE: Maybe backpressure isn't so bad

I suggest some of you read this post here. I posted it in the 4.6 section and still keep it handy every time the phrase backpressure gets mis-used.

There's a difference between backpressure and exhuast velocity.

Read up, you might learn something. I did https://mustangforums.com/m_1789889/tm.htm
Triisomy21 is offline  
Old 09-16-2006, 01:45 AM
  #23  
Virgule
2nd Gear Member
 
Virgule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location:
Posts: 448
Default RE: Maybe backpressure isn't so bad

What's confusing here is that it makes sense to use large pipes and flow through mufflers to "reduce backpressure", but what you are actually doing is "reducing exhaust velocity", which is where the "power loss" perception comes from. A well tuned exhaust system minimizes backpressure but maximizes exhaust velocity, which almost sounds contradictory when in the same breath, we are saying smaller diameter pipes are better!

Virgule is offline  
Old 09-16-2006, 03:02 PM
  #24  
swensicle
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
swensicle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location:
Posts: 413
Default RE: Maybe backpressure isn't so bad

That's craziness. Great post! I finished my exhaust yesterday and the addition of a couple feet of pipe and some tips not only made the car sound wicked awesome and a lot more refined, but I do notice a increase in power now that the exhaust is complete. Whether that be from velocity or backpressure doesn't matter a whole lot to me, it's the fact that one can notice a difference in power from what seems to be such a small difference.

swensicle is offline  
Old 09-16-2006, 05:08 PM
  #25  
viking396
5th Gear Member
 
viking396's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location:
Posts: 3,235
Default RE: Maybe backpressure isn't so bad


ORIGINAL: swensicle

I was more referring to torque and not hp. I'm also not referring to peak numbers, but the curve. My butt dyno tells me that I've lost some low-end grunt underneath 3k's. Do you still rebutt?

Also, I do believe that your compression braking is due more in part from actual motor compression then from exhaust back pressure.

I'm not trying to be an A$$ either......just in case it sounded like it.

P.S. - I also love the way your car sounds. I listened to your video a while back, and it inspired me to go this route.
Fire your butt dyno, the sound makes you feel as if you've lost power but you haven't. When I installed my MAC's it "felt" slower but the car ran the same times at the track, when I ran no mufflers for the heck of it prior to the install it ran the same times so...... fire your butt dyno.
viking396 is offline  
Old 09-16-2006, 10:11 PM
  #26  
MikeVistaBlue06
I ♥ Acer
 
MikeVistaBlue06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location:
Posts: 619
Default RE: Maybe backpressure isn't so bad

+1

Maximizing flow in a system goes along with what I said about sonic nodes causing backpressure. Any system that is impedence matched will not have these sonic nodes of backpressure; i.e. in a resonant condition will satisfy maximum transfer of fluid thus in this case maximizing exhaust flow and exhaust velocity.

Same thing happens when you have an 8 ohm receiver and match 8 ohm speakers to it; maximum current flows thus you get max power transfer to the speaker. Same as having your standing wave ratio on a transmitter at 1.00 as well! With the SWR at 1.00 there is no reflected power when you transmit. Reflected power can be thought of in the same sense as these sonic nodes of backpressure--aka a sonic wave reflected backwards such that it hinders the flow! Now that is exactly how you get "backpressure" by installing pipes that are too big or removing components that throws the system out of resonance. Think of it as reflected power!

Fluid flow and electrical current can be understood in the same terms!

Good ole physics!

Mike
MikeVistaBlue06 is offline  
Old 09-16-2006, 11:59 PM
  #27  
swensicle
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
swensicle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location:
Posts: 413
Default RE: Maybe backpressure isn't so bad

Haha....I might have to fire my butt dyno, but while your times are still the same, all I was basically saying is that the low-end felt a but less responsive.
swensicle is offline  
Old 09-19-2006, 12:53 PM
  #28  
firemaker117
 
firemaker117's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: PA
Posts: 27
Default RE: Maybe backpressure isn't so bad

Since I installed the SLP loudmouths, I've haven't noticed much power difference, but she accelerates in 5th better and my gas mileage has improved.

[IMG]local://upfiles/28949/389750C61B0048319561EFDC1E40BB1A.jpg[/IMG]
firemaker117 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CS2007
General Tech
8
06-25-2019 09:45 PM
Dathan
V6 (1994-2004) Mustangs
4
10-05-2015 05:52 AM
KingRando
2005-2014 Mustangs
5
10-02-2015 08:06 AM
UrS4
S197 Handling Section
1
09-30-2015 10:13 AM
GLOCKer
General Tech
0
09-28-2015 07:36 AM



Quick Reply: Maybe backpressure isn't so bad



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:21 AM.