WHAT TO DO NEXT FOR 400 RWHP
#11
RE: WHAT TO DO NEXT FOR 400 RWHP
Why don't you tell that to the Al P who has the fastest N/A Mod motor. Go tell him he should have put a S/C on it..
Its OK that you have S/C envy... I don't. I will be going FI (Twin Turbo) with a built engine down the road after the car has everything else done (Suspension, Upgraded Tranny, Rear end, etc).
Its OK that you have S/C envy... I don't. I will be going FI (Twin Turbo) with a built engine down the road after the car has everything else done (Suspension, Upgraded Tranny, Rear end, etc).
#12
RE: WHAT TO DO NEXT FOR 400 RWHP
Sure, it's POSSIBLE to build a big HP N/A motor, but it is extremely expensive. And Al P's engine is a heck of lot bigger than 4.6 L. Doing that in our cars would be even crazier:hand-fabricated exhaust, etc.
I am in complete agreement that it is cheaper to add FI than it is to keep it N/A if your HP goal is 400 or more.
I am in complete agreement that it is cheaper to add FI than it is to keep it N/A if your HP goal is 400 or more.
#13
RE: WHAT TO DO NEXT FOR 400 RWHP
ORIGINAL: vsop
Why don't you tell that to the Al P who has the fastest N/A Mod motor. Go tell him he should have put a S/C on it..
Its OK that you have S/C envy... I don't. I will be going FI (Twin Turbo) with a built engine down the road after the car has everything else done (Suspension, Upgraded Tranny, Rear end, etc).
Why don't you tell that to the Al P who has the fastest N/A Mod motor. Go tell him he should have put a S/C on it..
Its OK that you have S/C envy... I don't. I will be going FI (Twin Turbo) with a built engine down the road after the car has everything else done (Suspension, Upgraded Tranny, Rear end, etc).
#14
RE: WHAT TO DO NEXT FOR 400 RWHP
ORIGINAL: mustangman2424
I don't have S/C envy, I'm just stating the fact that if all you want is big numbers than it is stupid to spend way more money to get big numbers N/A, than it is to spend much less and just get an S/C. And I don't see why you would build up the stock block now because it will never handle a TT set-up.
ORIGINAL: vsop
Why don't you tell that to the Al P who has the fastest N/A Mod motor. Go tell him he should have put a S/C on it..
Its OK that you have S/C envy... I don't. I will be going FI (Twin Turbo) with a built engine down the road after the car has everything else done (Suspension, Upgraded Tranny, Rear end, etc).
Why don't you tell that to the Al P who has the fastest N/A Mod motor. Go tell him he should have put a S/C on it..
Its OK that you have S/C envy... I don't. I will be going FI (Twin Turbo) with a built engine down the road after the car has everything else done (Suspension, Upgraded Tranny, Rear end, etc).
Some people like me are forced to stay N/A. Mostly parental reasons. Most people like to go full bolt-ons, etc. because they can pay small amounts over time, and you don't need to drop 6500+ down for a good blower and install...
#15
RE: WHAT TO DO NEXT FOR 400 RWHP
ORIGINAL: mustangman2424
I don't have S/C envy, I'm just stating the fact that if all you want is big numbers than it is stupid to spend way more money to get big numbers N/A, than it is to spend much less and just get an S/C. And I don't see why you would build up the stock block now because it will never handle a TT set-up.
ORIGINAL: vsop
Why don't you tell that to the Al P who has the fastest N/A Mod motor. Go tell him he should have put a S/C on it..
Its OK that you have S/C envy... I don't. I will be going FI (Twin Turbo) with a built engine down the road after the car has everything else done (Suspension, Upgraded Tranny, Rear end, etc).
Why don't you tell that to the Al P who has the fastest N/A Mod motor. Go tell him he should have put a S/C on it..
Its OK that you have S/C envy... I don't. I will be going FI (Twin Turbo) with a built engine down the road after the car has everything else done (Suspension, Upgraded Tranny, Rear end, etc).
#17
RE: WHAT TO DO NEXT FOR 400 RWHP
ported heads, aftermarket intake ( i don't know which one) these will kick up a lot. most HP comes out of your heads.. but if you really wanna stay N/A and kick some ***.. i say get a freaking engine block and stroke it.. build it and you will see way over 400wrhp N/A but these cost a lot of money, drop a KENNE BELL and be done with it..
#18
RE: WHAT TO DO NEXT FOR 400 RWHP
ORIGINAL: doodad
ported heads, aftermarket intake ( i don't know which one) these will kick up a lot. most HP comes out of your heads.. but if you really wanna stay N/A and kick some ***.. i say get a freaking engine block and stroke it.. build it and you will see way over 400wrhp N/A but these cost a lot of money, drop a KENNE BELL and be done with it..
ported heads, aftermarket intake ( i don't know which one) these will kick up a lot. most HP comes out of your heads.. but if you really wanna stay N/A and kick some ***.. i say get a freaking engine block and stroke it.. build it and you will see way over 400wrhp N/A but these cost a lot of money, drop a KENNE BELL and be done with it..
#19
RE: WHAT TO DO NEXT FOR 400 RWHP
ORIGINAL: gibsonjb
I want to stay NA, but would like to obtain 400 rwhp on my 06 auto GT. Right now I'm at 320 rwhp with stage 3 comp cams, C&L street intake, 93 octane tune from diablosport, full exhaust with JBA shorty headers, UDP's, torrque converter, and 3.73's. Any suggestions to get me to my goal short of supercharging? I may be looking into the new intake manifold coming out next year. Your thoughts please.
next mods.... steeda suspension, carbon fiber drive shaft, steeda lightweight 17" wheels, strut tower brace
I want to stay NA, but would like to obtain 400 rwhp on my 06 auto GT. Right now I'm at 320 rwhp with stage 3 comp cams, C&L street intake, 93 octane tune from diablosport, full exhaust with JBA shorty headers, UDP's, torrque converter, and 3.73's. Any suggestions to get me to my goal short of supercharging? I may be looking into the new intake manifold coming out next year. Your thoughts please.
next mods.... steeda suspension, carbon fiber drive shaft, steeda lightweight 17" wheels, strut tower brace
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Matt's 95 Stang
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
2
10-05-2015 07:16 AM