340 RWHP N/A
Post #16
11-06-2007, 02:04 PM
#22
4th Gear Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: S.Florida
Posts: 1,612
RE: 340 RWHP N/A
ORIGINAL: 06Saleen3V
It is his cams...The comp cams lose torque...look at brenspeeds write-up
ORIGINAL: lldsandsll
what happened to your torque rench, my car makes more. the tb?
what happened to your torque rench, my car makes more. the tb?
11-06-2007, 03:24 PM
#24
poptart tits
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,886
RE: 340 RWHP N/A
ORIGINAL: AmericanMuscle4.6GT
now that more developed products such as better cams and boltons are coming out, its really not hard to get to 350 RWHP n/a.
now that more developed products such as better cams and boltons are coming out, its really not hard to get to 350 RWHP n/a.
I would say 380 RWHP would be the highest safest amount of HP you would run with H/C + Full bolt-ons.
The BBR stang that made 400ish RWHP was not street legal and was running a very dangerous tune.
11-06-2007, 05:44 PM
#26
5th Gear Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Tampico, Mexico
Posts: 2,206
RE: 340 RWHP N/A
ORIGINAL: KTownGT
You talking about CAM's like the Crower Custom grinds or what?
I would say 380 RWHP would be the highest safest amount of HP you would run with H/C + Full bolt-ons.
The BBR stang that made 400ish RWHP was not street legal and was running a very dangerous tune.
ORIGINAL: AmericanMuscle4.6GT
now that more developed products such as better cams and boltons are coming out, its really not hard to get to 350 RWHP n/a.
now that more developed products such as better cams and boltons are coming out, its really not hard to get to 350 RWHP n/a.
I would say 380 RWHP would be the highest safest amount of HP you would run with H/C + Full bolt-ons.
The BBR stang that made 400ish RWHP was not street legal and was running a very dangerous tune.
11-06-2007, 05:59 PM
#27
5th Gear Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 4,182
RE: 340 RWHP N/A
Cams are a bolt on
ORIGINAL: dseid2
Bolt ons won't get you past about 320 rwhp, you have to go with cams to get to the 340-350 rwhp mark. You are better offstepping up toa supercharger. A superchareger without an intercooler can get you a reliable 380 to 400rwhp without having to worry about changing out the powdered rods. Plus you will get more low end torque, which you will lose with cams. All in all a better package for the street.
Bolt ons won't get you past about 320 rwhp, you have to go with cams to get to the 340-350 rwhp mark. You are better offstepping up toa supercharger. A superchareger without an intercooler can get you a reliable 380 to 400rwhp without having to worry about changing out the powdered rods. Plus you will get more low end torque, which you will lose with cams. All in all a better package for the street.
11-06-2007, 10:03 PM
#28
3rd Gear Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location:
Posts: 523
RE: 340 RWHP N/A
I'm at 350 rwhp and 329 tq (on a hot and humid day). There's still a little more tuning I'm wanting to do, but haven't been able to set aside the time. The graphic shows before and after the cams (all else the same).
[IMG]local://upfiles/30073/53EE048D6D3F441B8B9890133A8810FB.gif[/IMG]
[IMG]local://upfiles/30073/53EE048D6D3F441B8B9890133A8810FB.gif[/IMG]
11-06-2007, 10:14 PM
#30
3rd Gear Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location:
Posts: 523
RE: 340 RWHP N/A
ORIGINAL: MexGT
whats the gross lift intake on your cams ratncage?
whats the gross lift intake on your cams ratncage?
490 exhaust
I don't remember the duration/overlap
I've posted this before, but incase you're wondering what it sounds like... http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...74062146976212
(and no, the car is NOT pink!)