Notices
GT S197 General Discussion This section is for technical discussions pertaining specifically to the V8 variation of the 2005 and newer Ford Mustang.

Magnaflow 2.5" vs 3" Performance Exhaust

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-08-2008, 08:09 AM
  #1  
The_Shirt
Thread Starter
 
The_Shirt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 42
Default Magnaflow 2.5" vs 3" Performance Exhaust

What is the difference between the 2.5" and 3" Magnaflow Performance cat-back systems? I am getting ready to put one or the other on my 06 GT 4.6L, and am curious on the difference. Is it an actual performance difference or an aesthetics issue? They have the dyna-tune results on their site, but they aren't both on the same car (one is on a GT 4.6L, other on a GT500). Thanks in advance for any insight...bill
The_Shirt is offline  
Old 08-08-2008, 08:18 AM
  #2  
tonkpils555666sas
4th Gear Member
 
tonkpils555666sas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Frederick, MD
Posts: 1,005
Default RE: Magnaflow 2.5" vs 3" Performance Exhaust

I wouldnt assume there is much of a performance difference at all. Generally, most catbacks see similar results. Variation in brand is more variation in sound/looks... 3" would probably be louder... but not by much... The tips would look good though.

heres the link to my exhaust with the 2.5... but i also have lt headers and no cats on the x pipe. The system is generally softer than others but when you get on it, they sound loud and fun... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eo7SXio2Qf8
tonkpils555666sas is offline  
Old 08-08-2008, 09:20 AM
  #3  
Blacksmoke
The Paranoid One
 
Blacksmoke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,320
Default RE: Magnaflow 2.5" vs 3" Performance Exhaust

2.5 is plenty, you dont need 3. In fact you will probablly loose some ummph with 3 unless you have a GT500 or something.
Definatly stay with 2.5.

And no 3 won't give you a noticable difference in sound.
Blacksmoke is offline  
Old 08-08-2008, 10:28 AM
  #4  
2k6silvergt
2nd Gear Member
 
2k6silvergt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 392
Default RE: Magnaflow 2.5" vs 3" Performance Exhaust

There will be a slight sound difference but nothing that noticeable. And there really isn't going to be a power difference unless you are making a lot of horsepower.
2k6silvergt is offline  
Old 08-08-2008, 11:33 AM
  #5  
kiki07gt
1st Gear Member
 
kiki07gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: So. AZ
Posts: 71
Default RE: Magnaflow 2.5" vs 3" Performance Exhaust

I put the 3.5" Ford Racing axle back and got roughly a 12-15hp increase in my GT. The sound is absolutely incredible and the look with the rolled stainless tips from the back is very stout and beefy! I do find some drone in the car about 1800rmp which goes away over 2000rpm.

http://www.fordracingparts.com/parts...tKeyField=7707

However - they are not legal for sound in CA. Good luck to you!
kiki07gt is offline  
Old 08-08-2008, 11:57 AM
  #6  
blackS197
4th Gear Member
 
blackS197's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: So Cal
Posts: 1,323
Default RE: Magnaflow 2.5" vs 3" Performance Exhaust

If you plan on going FI or already FI I would get the 3 inch. I have the 2 1/2 magnapaks and would of go the 3 if it were out back then.
blackS197 is offline  
Old 08-08-2008, 12:16 PM
  #7  
howarmat
s197 Junkie
 
howarmat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: IN
Posts: 16,087
Default RE: Magnaflow 2.5" vs 3" Performance Exhaust

ORIGINAL: kiki07gt

I put the 3.5" Ford Racing axle back and got roughly a 12-15hp increase in my GT. The sound is absolutely incredible and the look with the rolled stainless tips from the back is very stout and beefy! I do find some drone in the car about 1800rmp which goes away over 2000rpm.

http://www.fordracingparts.com/parts...tKeyField=7707

However - they are not legal for sound in CA. Good luck to you!
The dyno you were using was wrong. Axlebacks just dont give any gains for our cars. It would be nice to see gains like that though
howarmat is offline  
Old 08-08-2008, 12:35 PM
  #8  
The_Shirt
Thread Starter
 
The_Shirt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 42
Default RE: Magnaflow 2.5" vs 3" Performance Exhaust

Thanks all! The 2.5's are bought, paid for, and will be installed Tuesday. In reference to BlackS197, what is FI? I thought fuel-injected, but haven't most cars been fuel injected for a long time now?
The_Shirt is offline  
Old 08-08-2008, 12:45 PM
  #9  
modaddict
4th Gear Member
 
modaddict's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location:
Posts: 1,699
Default RE: Magnaflow 2.5" vs 3" Performance Exhaust

'Forced Induction', i.e. supercharger, turbo, Nitrous, etc.
modaddict is offline  
Old 08-08-2008, 12:56 PM
  #10  
The_Shirt
Thread Starter
 
The_Shirt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 42
Default RE: Magnaflow 2.5" vs 3" Performance Exhaust

Thanks once again. Nope, no plans here to make that heavy of a modification...
The_Shirt is offline  


Quick Reply: Magnaflow 2.5" vs 3" Performance Exhaust



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:13 AM.