Email vs Canned tune
#13
i would like to know whos stick and whos auto in this cause it makes a difference. Bama is known for having a bad *** auto tune. i run sct xcal 3s canned tune for my setup and like it much more since the cmdp. there was a huge diference there... that makes me think ive already gained the gain of an email tune
#15
<--- Stick as well, though with the 4.10s, and bamas tune, the stock tires are near usless in first, it is a bit hard to take off without spin. Although, I did select a race tune so I am not complaining, I got what I paid for, it just makes you look like a **** sometimes when you dont intend too.
#16
there is a difference in the tunes.. and the support that comes with them.. if i were an auto i would get a bama, Im a stick so ill probably end up getting a breenspeed. I have no real knowledge of any others. I had a custom tune from american muscle and i think the customized canned tune is better. I am currently running a sct xcal 3 with a canned tune that you select your parts and its honestly very good. it was ok before the plates but after the car really woke up... *** dyno says almost equal to intake and tune... really it was pretty distinct.
I havent datalogged it yet with the wideband because i cant get traction yet... to cold and we just got more snow so.... im waiting to see if i need a tune.
I havent datalogged it yet with the wideband because i cant get traction yet... to cold and we just got more snow so.... im waiting to see if i need a tune.
#17
In overall performance, hp and tq numbers, there is really difference in the tuners (brensped, bama or tilman). They might feel a little different. Regarding the tunes themselves, of course there is difference between a 87 and 91/93 tune.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Daleford
GT S197 General Discussion
0
08-10-2015 08:30 PM