Different TPMS Sensors for 2010 Mustangs..
Well, it seems that our friends at Ford have had a change of heart here. For those who are interested,the 2010 Mustangs now have a Valve Stem sensor (similar to GM) and not the Band-Sensor Combination that was found on the 2005-2009 models. And apparently, the band-sensor combo will not work on the 2010"s.
|
what I heard too. Should be eaiser to move the sensors to new wheels that way. But I wonder what happens when the valve stems need to be replaced. I have had them rot and leak. So next time that happens, instead of replacing a cheap stem, we get to replace expensive ones.
|
Originally Posted by 07 GT E UPP
(Post 6748841)
Well, it seems that our friends at Ford have had a change of heart here. For those who are interested,the 2010 Mustangs now have a Valve Stem sensor (similar to GM) and not the Band-Sensor Combination that was found on the 2005-2009 models. And apparently, the band-sensor combo will not work on the 2010"s.
|
Originally Posted by chronos
(Post 6749994)
Why wouldn't they work? Different frequency or signal? The band ones were just a radio transmitter. I don't know what the stem ones are like. You certain they can't be programmed?
|
Originally Posted by Cusp
(Post 6749279)
what I heard too. Should be eaiser to move the sensors to new wheels that way. But I wonder what happens when the valve stems need to be replaced. I have had them rot and leak. So next time that happens, instead of replacing a cheap stem, we get to replace expensive ones.
Only time the whole thing would need to be replaced is if it fails. |
Originally Posted by Cusp
(Post 6749279)
what I heard too. Should be eaiser to move the sensors to new wheels that way. But I wonder what happens when the valve stems need to be replaced. I have had them rot and leak. So next time that happens, instead of replacing a cheap stem, we get to replace expensive ones.
They are made from stainless steel so they dont rust either. :) The valve cores are the only rubber item. They are easily replaced in seconds.
Originally Posted by chronos
(Post 6749994)
Why wouldn't they work? Different frequency or signal? The band ones were just a radio transmitter. I don't know what the stem ones are like. You certain they can't be programmed?
All air sensors systems in the US run on 420MHz. Its the digital coded signal thats different. A simple scanner with a discriminator output and a digital capture Oscope shows this to be true. The S197s spit out an 8 bit and the new sensors have a 16 bit digital signature. Evidently they ran out of available numbers with only 8 bits of info to work with. 2 to the 8th power plus 1. |
Originally Posted by 157db
(Post 6753125)
The signal is 420MHz as mandated by the FCC.
All air sensors systems in the US run on 420MHz. Its the digital coded signal thats different. A simple scanner with a discriminator output and a digital capture Oscope shows this to be true. The S197s spit out an 8 bit and the new sensors have a 16 bit digital signature. Evidently they ran out of available numbers with only 8 bits of info to work with. 2 to the 8th power plus 1. It wouldn't surprise me if a smart entrepreneur comes up with some inexpensive module to make the old sensors talk to the new ones or visa versa. |
well, there is the air-aware "ez-sensor", which is programmable prior to installation, supposedly.
http://www.ez-sensor.com/ |
Originally Posted by danzcool
(Post 6753338)
well, there is the air-aware "ez-sensor", which is programmable prior to installation, supposedly.
http://www.ez-sensor.com/ The rubber rots over time and then where are you? |
Strangely enough, I put on new wheels with out TPMS sensors, and have no alarms, go figure!
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:35 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands