terrible MPG on tuned '10
#14
Cold temps will also reduce the mpg's. When the ambient drops way down below freezing, I have to drive at least 5 miles before mine reaches normal operating temperature.
Last edited by ski; 02-01-2011 at 01:06 PM.
#15
I have a 2010 vert that has the Tuneable Induction CAI and the tune that came with it...i am NOT gettng very good MPG's....the car say 14.5
I drive mostly short drives to work and back...12 miles each way
I am a little heavy on the gas, but not crazy.
Should I be getting better or is this about right?
I drive mostly short drives to work and back...12 miles each way
I am a little heavy on the gas, but not crazy.
Should I be getting better or is this about right?
If you very rarely break 55MPH in your daily commutes, your avg MPG will suck, and royally.
I have a CAI 93octane performance tune in my car right now, and with at least 60% freeway driving above 60MPH, I observe around 20-21 avg MPH and that is out of a bigger engine, a 5.0L Coyote.
In straight city with speeds less than 55MPH, I observe way lower avg MPG, about the same you see out of your car, 14-15 MPG.
The bottom line is the tune and CAI requires you to dump more fuel into the engine, otherwise your would be running too lean.
What you can possible do is buy a tune for fuel economy if that is your prerogative. Get an 87 octane street tune and request economy as the primary focus of that tune and you will see your MPG go up some, maybe a pinch above stock tune. And you will still see some power increases too, believe it or not.
#17
6th Gear Member
I suspect that, for the 4.6L, the optimal engine RPM for best fuel mileage is in the 1400-1500 RPM range
#19
With mine modded as shown in my sig, it gets 20-21 mpg in warm weather and 19-20 mpg in cold weather when driven around town at 30-40 mph with red light stops every 1/8-1/2 mile, and an occasional WOT run.
Also, a well written modded tune should normally not cause lower mpg than the factory tune if the engine is warmed up and running POT, because the ECM is in the "closed loop" mode receiving signals from the O2 sensor, which sets the A/F at a continuous stoichiometric value of approx. 14.7:1.
A modded tune, however, may cause lower mpg than the factory tune when the engine is cold or running WOT, because the ECM is now in the "open loop" mode, and the A/F ratio is being governed by the tune's tables in the ECM's memory.
Also, a well written modded tune should normally not cause lower mpg than the factory tune if the engine is warmed up and running POT, because the ECM is in the "closed loop" mode receiving signals from the O2 sensor, which sets the A/F at a continuous stoichiometric value of approx. 14.7:1.
A modded tune, however, may cause lower mpg than the factory tune when the engine is cold or running WOT, because the ECM is now in the "open loop" mode, and the A/F ratio is being governed by the tune's tables in the ECM's memory.
#20
I have a 2010 vert GT Premium with a Steeda CAI and SCT tuner and drive from Hendersonville to Nashville daily through the same traffic. I got about 17 mpg on the stock SCT tune, then increased to 19.5 to 21 mpg with a custom tune from Bama. I'd check the tune. BTW - The 97 octane race tune from Bama is sick