Mustang News, Concepts, Rumors & Discussion Did you see that Mustang?! Have you heard Ford's next move? Come inside.

Camaro #'s vs Mustang #'s

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-21-2009, 08:46 AM
  #1  
DarkCandy08GT
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
DarkCandy08GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: NY
Posts: 126
Default Camaro #'s vs Mustang #'s

Some fresh Camaro stats from MororTrend's first road test

V6 Auto V6 Manual
0-60 in 6.0 0-60 in 5.9
V8 Auto V8 Manual
0-60 in 4.6 0-60 in 4.7

1/4 in 14.6 1/4 in 14.4
1/4 13.1 1/4 in 13.0

Braking, 60-0 106 ft 107 ft 107 ft 105 ft Lateral g 0.93 g 0.93 g 0.9 0g 0.90 g
I guess not as bad as I thought but .5 in a lot in the 1/4 for a car thats costs the same as a track pack Mustang...

What do you guys think compared to the 2010 GT's we know?
DarkCandy08GT is offline  
Old 03-21-2009, 11:33 AM
  #2  
ProfilerGT
 
ProfilerGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Mass.
Posts: 39
Default

Everything I've read in the passed 4-5 months have had about the same numbers including an 6 month old magazine at my barber shop that said the camaro V6. did 0-60 in 6.1 but they were hoping to bring it down to 5.9. The v8's were the same numbers as they are today (4.6 or so).

I think the power is great but that wasn’t enough to make me change my mind a couple weeks ago on still going with the Mustang GT. I went for the whole package instead of getting caught up in the whole "Camaro SS will blow the doors off Mustangs by .5 seconds to 60". I think its great they can and they are both great cars. I know that half a second may mean the world to some people for various reasons but for the average buyer I think they're looking at the big picture, personal preference, and price tags.
ProfilerGT is offline  
Old 03-21-2009, 01:34 PM
  #3  
BatStallion
 
BatStallion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location:
Posts: 38
Default

I finally got to see a new Camaro up close at the local car show here in Richmond last week and I have to admit it was pretty impressive. I'm persoanlly still ticked there is no Firebird but with GM's ills I'm sure that isnt even on the list of things they are worried about.
Ford had a new Stang in attendance as well but some unearthly reason they had it locked. The car was also a very bright powder blue color which I cant say was the most appealing. The interior looks gorgeous compared to the last model and I think as soon as some of the sportier models hit the showroom there will be big interest. Even if the Camaro offers all the great hardware, if it doesnt look any more aggressive sitting there as this car did then it will suffer the same fate as the GTO...great mechanicals under a lukewarm skin. If it fall under looks alone, I think the new Stang with its upscale exterior will be the final winner.
BatStallion is offline  
Old 03-21-2009, 01:42 PM
  #4  
medrick
2nd Gear Member
 
medrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 394
Default

Damn't I still havn't got to see one up close. I went to a "new car" auto show and they had everything (including the ugly *** puke gold looking color mustang gt) except the camaro. I'm pretty pissed cause I really wanted to check one out close up.
medrick is offline  
Old 03-21-2009, 07:25 PM
  #5  
ProfilerGT
 
ProfilerGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Mass.
Posts: 39
Default

http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...ticleId=144431

The above link is from Edmunds. Its from 3/20/09 and marks the mustang GT and Camaro SS times very close with Camaro very very slightly faster. Good article and vid.
ProfilerGT is offline  
Old 03-22-2009, 02:14 PM
  #6  
jtstakelin
2nd Gear Member
 
jtstakelin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 384
Default

I find it hard to believe that the V6 camaro is that much faster to 60 than my V6 stang. The camaro weights more and the extra horsepower is eaten up by the massive weight difference. Please let me know if I am wrong.
jtstakelin is offline  
Old 03-22-2009, 04:56 PM
  #7  
83gtragtop
5th Gear Member
 
83gtragtop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: DTLA, CA
Posts: 4,897
Default

Originally Posted by jtstakelin
I find it hard to believe that the V6 camaro is that much faster to 60 than my V6 stang. The camaro weights more and the extra horsepower is eaten up by the massive weight difference. Please let me know if I am wrong.
You're wrong. The difference in weight does not make up for the 90hp difference. Generally 100lbs=10hp
83gtragtop is offline  
Old 03-22-2009, 10:28 PM
  #8  
gburke1
3rd Gear Member
 
gburke1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Overland Park, Kansas
Posts: 536
Default

Look at the trap speeds on the quarter mile.

Edmunds got a 13.0 at 110.9 MPH... which to me indicates that it will be capable of somewhere around 12.5 give or take.
gburke1 is offline  
Old 03-22-2009, 10:28 PM
  #9  
jtstakelin
2nd Gear Member
 
jtstakelin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 384
Default

Originally Posted by 83gtragtop
You're wrong. The difference in weight does not make up for the 90hp difference. Generally 100lbs=10hp
Oh well. I still won't trade my 'stang for a camaro. Can't be right all the time.
jtstakelin is offline  
Old 03-23-2009, 01:33 AM
  #10  
SVTeeshirt
5th Gear Member
 
SVTeeshirt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Maryland
Posts: 4,955
Default

i made this for you guys.

SVTeeshirt is offline  


Quick Reply: Camaro #'s vs Mustang #'s



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:14 AM.