stealth_GT

.. at least it's not as bad as the Evo X or the newer style Eclipses..

simpsonfan13

^that. the new evo looks agresseive but it does NOT say evo to me. the eclipse looks like a rolly-polly.

LS1fivepointO

Well the Evo as always been kind of ugly and ridiculous.

The last 2 generations of Mustangs have been pretty good, especially the front. And most people here seem to think the *** end if pretty good too lol.

Cobra Drifter

At least Ford is making the effort to redo the rear after the 2010 design was kinda a fail

starbai

fail? says who :-p

crysalis_01

Not with a CBIRS, which I see Ford utilizing because of it's lightweight design. Under a drag type launch load it behaves much more like a SRA than a traditional IRS.



I for one much prefer the '10+ rear to the '05-'09 rear, as the '05-'09 looked too plain/simple, for lack of better descriptors.

elphil

Have you seen this? http://www.autoweek.com/article/2011...n=awdailydrive

simpsonfan13

^ that. the '10+ rear is beter in my opnion, it has more style. the 05-09 looks too toy like.

also: iI know this is a bit late but is there an offical moniker for the '10+? i.e. new edge, fox?
why not use N-197? Like new edge was an update for the sn-95, so too is the '10 for the s-197. N for "neo"?

crysalis_01

I believe the editors and writers at 5.0 & Super Fords and Muscle Mustangs and Fast Fords refer to the '10+'s as SN-10...but that's a more 'in house' designation. The "SN" part while the same as the SN95 actually is derived for them from one of their early reviews where one of the writers made the comment that the new front end design style reminded him of a shark. . . SN Shark Nose and the 10 is obviously from the year.

mph07alloy

2015 Mustang article on MOTORTREND online

http://www.motortrend.com/future/fut...ect/index.html