Fox Body 5.0 Vs RX-7
01-09-2005, 03:11 AM
#1
I ♥ Acer
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location:
Posts: 1,031
Fox Body 5.0 Vs RX-7
http://kane.phpwebhosting.com/~*****...g_****_rx7.wmv
Mustangs only mod was cat back. And i thought that RX-7 was fast on the highway.... I guess i was wrong.
Nick
Mustangs only mod was cat back. And i thought that RX-7 was fast on the highway.... I guess i was wrong.
Nick
01-09-2005, 06:06 AM
#5
6th Gear Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 12,575
RE: Fox Body 5.0 Vs RX-7
ORIGINAL: 2000Si
There's no way that was a turbo RX7.
The guy is a lamer.
There's no way that was a turbo RX7.
The guy is a lamer.
Its hard to tell from the vid, but that looks like a notchback. I can see a notch with a catback (if it was a factory freak) doing this, they were pretty quick (LX notch).
01-09-2005, 06:31 AM
#6
Guest
Posts: n/a
RE: Fox Body 5.0 Vs RX-7
RX7 turbos are in the 99+ GT territory as far as 1/4 times, I believe non turbo RX7s are mid 15 second cars. All that Fox had was catback, so I'd venture to say it's a 14.8-15.1 car.
That RX7 wasn't turbo, but the owner thinks it's badass just because it's an RX7. He got schooled... on video no less.
That RX7 wasn't turbo, but the owner thinks it's badass just because it's an RX7. He got schooled... on video no less.
01-09-2005, 01:20 PM
#8
I ♥ Acer
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: New York
Posts: 1,740
RE: Fox Body 5.0 Vs RX-7
You know what I call that, trying to beat a car that has 3.08 rear on top speed. I have a 3.08 rear, and when I race on the highway from a fast roll, I beat a lot of cars that would smoke the crap out of me from a dig.
