Syndicate

Much to learn... The Supra has a perfect blend of speed handling and looks. And as far as performance, Turbo magazine stated it has one of the most bullet proof engines in the world, also making #1 for best bang for your buck. where you pulling these facts from? your ***?
Just as the other guy said. Try telling this to supraforums.com . I love both the Stang and Supra. The stang is all about american muscle, mean sounds, and 5 seconds in the 1/4 mile. Supra is a more exotic car that will waste stock Vipers, Ferarris,etc. at BPU level which is at the most $200. My uncle's BPU level is around 400HP only costing him around $150. SO what's high cost about the Supra that doesnt make it perform?

Jugador1

perfect blend of speed handling and looks? that one is merely opinion and since you cant back that up it's already a void argument. Turbo magazine can eat deez nuts for all i care, its engine better be bullet proof for $30k used. and i dont see how its best bang for the buck...if you have anything to rectify that, please post it. and as for the rest of your post, i dont even understand it.</P>


now here is what i have to say...for the amount of power they can easily produce with a single turbo or whatnot, they never can seem to put it down wellin the 1/4. i dont see them as the perfect car you guys do if it can't go fast there (fast being a relative term...they can be putting down huge numbers and still run 9's or 10's when other cars with the same output can be running 7's or 8's).</P>

BLKSTANG9879

Dam it! I'm not gettin the video, I'm just getting the sound.

f4st

</P>


We arent saying we can go buy, were saying that theyre bad *** cars. Go over to supraforums.com and take alook at some of there cars, but then again theres just a bunch of ricers over there <IMG src=smileys/smiley24.gif border="0">supras are notorious for being highway cars</P>

Jugador1

thats what i mean...they are insane on the highway/up to speed, but id want to burn it up off the line

callmecobra

</P>


dude supras are the s**t! people dont have to like them, but i havent seen to many documented cases of stock blocks holding down 1250whp, on any other car, excluding a new cobra.</P>

SA_Cobra

</P>


um then get 5.0 issue of jan 04.... cobra w/ stcok internal RUNNING 9'S PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE DONT TALK CRAP THE NEW COBRAS THEY ARE JUST AWESOME</P>

Guest

</P>


hahahaha hey, here's an idea, read the last four words in his post before you get all pissy. lmao</P>

Jugador1

LOL</P>


im burying the hatchet here, who cares. i have a 4 banger mustang so i have no reason to even argue about supras</P>

Syndicate

I have my facts backed up. You however do not. So who's better some forum troll who doesnt know what he's talking about or 100s of engineer critics from turbo magazine. I think youre being skeptic that a Japanese engine performs better than you think it does which shouldnt be the case since road races are all about performance not tradition. SupraTT are as low as $15K-$20K with the same durability as if you bought it for $30K , $30K meaning you want a 97/98 TT.Was gone from camping during the week. You are right about them not doing so well in 1/4 mile times. but their RWHP is based upon that turbo spooling up, so you can expect half their HP at the start, not full RWHP, not to forget they do 9's without NOS. If mile runs were popular, you would see Supras at the top. As far as burning SUpras (bpu since no one keeps a stock supra)off the line, youd prolly only do a car length with a 2003 Cobra/BPU, and you have about 3 seconds for pride and joy that youre winning so far, before the Supra pulls on you and the driver has the last laugh.<edited><editID>Syndicate</editID><editDate>37988.9107175926</editDate></edited>