Mustangs VS Cobalt SS
#21
RE: Mustangs VS Cobalt SS
ORIGINAL: codyss
Why is it that 90% of the posts here that talk **** about the SS are made by people who I could beat in my slow little Cobalt SS.
It doesn't matter what the roll mph was a Cobalt SS will kill a 99-04 GT from any mph. Except for under 30mph because then I just spin through first and second.
Face it a GT cannot compete with F-Bodies, Maximas, Altimas and now Cobalt SS's.
Hmmmm, Now I remember why I sold my GT.
What excusses are you all going to have when you run into a Stage 2 Cobalt SS?
Why is it that 90% of the posts here that talk **** about the SS are made by people who I could beat in my slow little Cobalt SS.
It doesn't matter what the roll mph was a Cobalt SS will kill a 99-04 GT from any mph. Except for under 30mph because then I just spin through first and second.
Face it a GT cannot compete with F-Bodies, Maximas, Altimas and now Cobalt SS's.
Hmmmm, Now I remember why I sold my GT.
What excusses are you all going to have when you run into a Stage 2 Cobalt SS?
I really hope im in that 10% you refer to as those who can whoop dat ***! Which goes for most of the cars on this board. So let me change your quote to properly suit what needs to be said...
ORIGINAL: codyss
Why is it that 9.9% of the posts here that talk **** about the SS are made by people who I could never beat in my slow little Cobalt SS. Is my car really that slow? I guess so. I will leave you guys alone now and take my front wheel drive-S/C 4 CYL-ricer mentality with me.
Why is it that 9.9% of the posts here that talk **** about the SS are made by people who I could never beat in my slow little Cobalt SS. Is my car really that slow? I guess so. I will leave you guys alone now and take my front wheel drive-S/C 4 CYL-ricer mentality with me.
#23
RE: Mustangs VS Cobalt SS
WOW... and thats the good motor too if i'm right. Same motor they put in the type R's. And as far as the ricer that went on earlier, ANYBODY can be called a ricer, all you need is a set of altezza tail lights and/or a hideous looking car lol.
#25
RE: Mustangs VS Cobalt SS
I believe that being a "ricer" is more less a frame of mind. I personally will never drive a 4/6 CYL thats sold to the public as a "Fast Car" because there is no real such thing as a stock four banger with potential. It takes a lot of work to make one go fast. You can say the SRT4 does and I will argue the point because there is two of them down the road from me thats sitting in the yard and aint moving an inch because those bit*hes are blown to hell and back. We all know a 2V GT with a blower, exhaust, a little suspension work and a good driver will go low to mid 11's and there is more than enough proof right here on this site. Ive seen it in person. Thats called potential.
#26
RE: Mustangs VS Cobalt SS
Nice Cobalt but sorry I rather have my GT, but why do you guys bash the GT? The car is capable of doing 150 Easily for $26k Im happy with that if thats not enough mybe a Cobra 170MPH? Not enough Just go get a Saleen S7 LOL 220MPH? Still not enough just go but a Jet! But the GT is a sweet car I know ive down 124MPH in mine @ just a little past 3000 RPMS! Only did it one time I baby her!
#28
RE: Mustangs VS Cobalt SS
ORIGINAL: codyss
A video I found of a GT vs Cobalt SS
http://s62.yousendit.com/d.aspx?id=2...00OFVRV4GWGCLM
A video I found of a GT vs Cobalt SS
http://s62.yousendit.com/d.aspx?id=2...00OFVRV4GWGCLM
#29
RE: Mustangs VS Cobalt SS
the cobalt ss are the "same" as the saturn redline correct? my gf spanked her neighbors redline badly in her 05gt. it was hilarious...only because he kept saying..."but its supercharged, i'd smoke you" i said...yeah it sc'd but it only make 205hp or something. he really didn't get it. so my gf offered him a race to shut him up. he's a pretty cool guy and his last car was a stock civic, so he just had to be smacked into reality