TT or FlowZilla
#31
RE: TT or FlowZilla
ORIGINAL: Obsol3te
Well, I'll say what I did in the chat to ya.
Why did you buy a v8 in the first place if you don't like power down low?
Only reason I want a turbo is for the insane numbers of course.
And the damn cool BOV with a V8 Rumble...
That's scary
Well, I'll say what I did in the chat to ya.
Why did you buy a v8 in the first place if you don't like power down low?
Only reason I want a turbo is for the insane numbers of course.
And the damn cool BOV with a V8 Rumble...
That's scary
#32
RE: TT or FlowZilla
All that power down low on the eatons and twin screws sucks IMHO
Lemme know about your setup on that 18psi monster there birdie
I know you drive them top fuel funny cars or whatnot.
But let's hear about your street stuff
I know you drive them top fuel funny cars or whatnot.
But let's hear about your street stuff
#33
RE: TT or FlowZilla
Ouch... did you tell that story about the dealership crashing your car before?
Think I remember reading that...
Complete and utter BS
They better give you more than just an 05 E car...
All that time and money poored into that thing
And also, those 42lb injectors, they ran a-ok with the fuel as rich as it has to be when running a form of FI?
around 11-12ish.
I'm going to be making some pretty decent numbers later down the line, seeing as soon as I get my engine from the shop, I'll be adding that 150shot as soon as it's ready and willing.
And the winter of 05 is when I plan on getting the blower.
So, I'm not too sure the 42's may be enough?
And would they be OVERKILL if I had just got them with running the 331 normally on the street?
On the 331, prolly making around 330ish rwhp at 8.5:1 compression.
Then being upped around 450rwhpish... on the bottle, so the bottle should be fine but the casual driving on the street is what I'm worried about.
I do have a short list of mods that will transfer over, and I'm afraid I'm going to have to change my rear end gears too
4.10s seem a little too big for what I want to do now.
I'm almost definatly going with the blower, unless turbochargedpower.com can change my mind with their phonecall tomorrow.
But I doubt that's going to be the case.
Bah, and I still have to consider all the driveline/rear end work too...
Won't swarm you with questions just yet
This seems sufficient for now
Think I remember reading that...
Complete and utter BS
They better give you more than just an 05 E car...
All that time and money poored into that thing
And also, those 42lb injectors, they ran a-ok with the fuel as rich as it has to be when running a form of FI?
around 11-12ish.
I'm going to be making some pretty decent numbers later down the line, seeing as soon as I get my engine from the shop, I'll be adding that 150shot as soon as it's ready and willing.
And the winter of 05 is when I plan on getting the blower.
So, I'm not too sure the 42's may be enough?
And would they be OVERKILL if I had just got them with running the 331 normally on the street?
On the 331, prolly making around 330ish rwhp at 8.5:1 compression.
Then being upped around 450rwhpish... on the bottle, so the bottle should be fine but the casual driving on the street is what I'm worried about.
I do have a short list of mods that will transfer over, and I'm afraid I'm going to have to change my rear end gears too
4.10s seem a little too big for what I want to do now.
I'm almost definatly going with the blower, unless turbochargedpower.com can change my mind with their phonecall tomorrow.
But I doubt that's going to be the case.
Bah, and I still have to consider all the driveline/rear end work too...
Won't swarm you with questions just yet
This seems sufficient for now
#34
RE: TT or FlowZilla
The insurance just settled today on the E car, and I came out well. I'm getting a check this week for $63,421. -Yeah, you'll need taller gears, but it will work to your advantage. Those 42lb-ers should be ok to at least 550 rwhp, at least. How are you gonna do the tune? Chip? I abandoned the chip for the MAF tuner. If I was doing it all over, I probably would have gotten a Steeda timing adjuster, as well. I say get the KB. I really think you'll be happier in the end, all things considered.
#35
RE: TT or FlowZilla
Tune will be controlled by my SCT Flip Chip, that's already installed.
I can have it tuned for free up at the dyno I go to.
Thing works great, currently use it for when on and off the juice
I can have it tuned for free up at the dyno I go to.
Thing works great, currently use it for when on and off the juice
#36
RE: TT or FlowZilla
[quote]ORIGINAL: Birdieman4
As I said, please tell me ONE instance of ANY twin screw/eaton type of supercharger being ran in a competitive dragracing class.
You can't, because there isnt any.
I guarentee you this: You set up a centrifugal/turbo car with the exact same setup as a twinscrew/eaton, and drag race em, and the twinscrew/eaton is NOT gonna cross the finish line first.
Great, so you make 550 FT/LBs at 1900 RPM, boosting the CRAP outta your engine every time you start it up and drive around normally, putting extra strain on it and making it hard to drive normally, and you still get your *** handed to you buy a car that is competely streetable and mild mannered (espically a turbo setup) until you take it past 3000 RPM.
You 5.0 guys are so centered on "Down low torque". How many times have you raced someone and shifted at 2500 RPM? How long do you stay down there in any race (christ, with a blown setup, what is it .2 seconds?)
quote:
All that power down low on the eatons and twin screws sucks IMHO
...what a noob
All that power down low on the eatons and twin screws sucks IMHO
...what a noob
You can't, because there isnt any.
I guarentee you this: You set up a centrifugal/turbo car with the exact same setup as a twinscrew/eaton, and drag race em, and the twinscrew/eaton is NOT gonna cross the finish line first.
Great, so you make 550 FT/LBs at 1900 RPM, boosting the CRAP outta your engine every time you start it up and drive around normally, putting extra strain on it and making it hard to drive normally, and you still get your *** handed to you buy a car that is competely streetable and mild mannered (espically a turbo setup) until you take it past 3000 RPM.
You 5.0 guys are so centered on "Down low torque". How many times have you raced someone and shifted at 2500 RPM? How long do you stay down there in any race (christ, with a blown setup, what is it .2 seconds?)
#37
RE: TT or FlowZilla
ORIGINAL: 2000GT4.6
As I said, please tell me ONE instance of ANY twin screw/eaton type of supercharger being ran in a competitive dragracing class.
You can't, because there isnt any.
I guarentee you this: You set up a centrifugal/turbo car with the exact same setup as a twinscrew/eaton, and drag race em, and the twinscrew/eaton is NOT gonna cross the finish line first.
Great, so you make 550 FT/LBs at 1900 RPM, boosting the CRAP outta your engine every time you start it up and drive around normally, putting extra strain on it and making it hard to drive normally, and you still get your *** handed to you buy a car that is competely streetable and mild mannered (espically a turbo setup) until you take it past 3000 RPM.
You 5.0 guys are so centered on "Down low torque". How many times have you raced someone and shifted at 2500 RPM? How long do you stay down there in any race (christ, with a blown setup, what is it .2 seconds?)
As I said, please tell me ONE instance of ANY twin screw/eaton type of supercharger being ran in a competitive dragracing class.
You can't, because there isnt any.
I guarentee you this: You set up a centrifugal/turbo car with the exact same setup as a twinscrew/eaton, and drag race em, and the twinscrew/eaton is NOT gonna cross the finish line first.
Great, so you make 550 FT/LBs at 1900 RPM, boosting the CRAP outta your engine every time you start it up and drive around normally, putting extra strain on it and making it hard to drive normally, and you still get your *** handed to you buy a car that is competely streetable and mild mannered (espically a turbo setup) until you take it past 3000 RPM.
You 5.0 guys are so centered on "Down low torque". How many times have you raced someone and shifted at 2500 RPM? How long do you stay down there in any race (christ, with a blown setup, what is it .2 seconds?)
And you don't just make boost until like 3k in a twin screw, you make FULL boost as soon as you mash the pedal in any gear
It doesn't top off like in a roots
It continues to rise ever so slightly as you're driving it thru the rpm band.
Not as progressive as a Centrifugal or a Turbo, but it's still does.
So, what's so wrong about having full power down low and up high?
Instead of just up high?
And WHY ARE YOU DRIVING A v8! if all you want is up high...?
#38
RE: TT or FlowZilla
As I said, please tell me ONE instance of ANY twin screw/eaton type of supercharger being ran in a competitive dragracing class.
If Obsol3te was building a race only car, I could see him running a different setup (TT's I bet). Backing up theories without experience doesn't help your credibility.
#39
RE: TT or FlowZilla
Ob, you have to make a choice, there is no in between for the setups do you want low to mid range power or do you want mid to high power? Also a KB will still give you psi in high rpm, just not near as much as turbos. How much psi you can get away with would mainly depend on your heads, intake manifold, & intercooler. One of my old friends was running 21 psi on 93 octane on an inline 6. & like Roundman said it is a VERY good idea to get an oil cooler
94Cbra, Top fuelers don't run turbos because it is impossible to run them the engine puts out too much heat for the turbo to handle. & you don't need the car running 3-5 minutes, 10seconds will work 30seconds is normal 60 is more than enough.
Roundman, the space & heat transfer you have will depend on how your headers are. You can make small turboheaders so less room will be used. & aluminum heat shields can be made to go by your exhaust to keep the heat to a minimum on other parts if you are worried about it alot. generally the moving air keeps the engine bay temp down
Lovemy88gt, most people don't have problems with the turbo spooling. They rev the engine till the turbo spools then let off the clutch & the tires spin, by time the tires grip they are already at full boost. Racing from a stop you usually dont have to worry about not having boost once you leave first gear.
Birdieman4, twin turbos offer better performance advanges on engines with two banks, ie v4, v6, v8, flat 4, ect... because you can design far better headers. Exhaust manifold design is a key to big power output. It is for this reason twins on a engine with two banks will spool faster, have less lag, & higher power output. The big problem with twin setups is synchronizing the wastegates.
94Cbra, Top fuelers don't run turbos because it is impossible to run them the engine puts out too much heat for the turbo to handle. & you don't need the car running 3-5 minutes, 10seconds will work 30seconds is normal 60 is more than enough.
Roundman, the space & heat transfer you have will depend on how your headers are. You can make small turboheaders so less room will be used. & aluminum heat shields can be made to go by your exhaust to keep the heat to a minimum on other parts if you are worried about it alot. generally the moving air keeps the engine bay temp down
Lovemy88gt, most people don't have problems with the turbo spooling. They rev the engine till the turbo spools then let off the clutch & the tires spin, by time the tires grip they are already at full boost. Racing from a stop you usually dont have to worry about not having boost once you leave first gear.
Birdieman4, twin turbos offer better performance advanges on engines with two banks, ie v4, v6, v8, flat 4, ect... because you can design far better headers. Exhaust manifold design is a key to big power output. It is for this reason twins on a engine with two banks will spool faster, have less lag, & higher power output. The big problem with twin setups is synchronizing the wastegates.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jessupmustang302
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
40
10-14-2014 06:33 AM
ruger311
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
31
11-07-2006 11:06 AM