Notices
S197 Handling Section For everything suspension related, inlcuding brakes, tires, and wheels.

Which LCA to get for my 2007 GT

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-31-2010, 09:17 AM
  #1  
acascianelli
5th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
acascianelli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Sterling Heights, MI
Posts: 4,409
Default Which LCA to get for my 2007 GT

I need to replace my rear LCA's on my 2007 GT. I've been looking at the billet LCA's from Steeda but I wanted to double check with people here to make sure those are recommended pieces or if there is something else that would suite my needs better.

Basically, now that I have the chance to upgrade I want something better than the stock pieces. I may decide to lower my car in the future, but if I do it would be a conservative drop of maybe and 1-1.5 inches. I'm not sure if a set of adjustable LCA's would be better or not.

Let me know...
acascianelli is offline  
Old 08-31-2010, 10:15 AM
  #2  
moochman4life
3rd Gear Member
 
moochman4life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Norfolk, VA
Posts: 509
Default

What's your plan?...as in the reason you're getting new LCA's? Strip...or something else?
moochman4life is offline  
Old 08-31-2010, 10:27 AM
  #3  
acascianelli
5th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
acascianelli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Sterling Heights, MI
Posts: 4,409
Default

The bushings on mine now have started to deteriorate and are making a lot of noise. Plus, I was hoping that better aftermarket units would eliminate some wheelhop. I don't take my car to the strip, but I do enjoy the occasional light to light race.
acascianelli is offline  
Old 08-31-2010, 10:35 AM
  #4  
Sam Strano
Former Sponsor
 
Sam Strano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,936
Default

You don't need adjustables because you are lowering the car (or planning on it). Those are for fixing thrust angle in the axle (the axle being cockeyed in vs. the body when viewed from above).

As for which LCA's there are a number of good ones. The Steeda Billets are gorgeous and light---though if you went that way I'd recommend the set with the spherical bearings in the rear position vs. the all poly. UMI also makes a lot of very nice control arms as well. There I'd recommend one of types that are what we call "poly/roto-joint" combinations. UMI stuff is tubular steel, vs. billet aluminum.... of course they cost less for that reason but the quality is very, very good.
Sam Strano is offline  
Old 08-31-2010, 10:46 AM
  #5  
acascianelli
5th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
acascianelli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Sterling Heights, MI
Posts: 4,409
Default

Why is having the spherical bearing better with the Steeda's?
acascianelli is offline  
Old 08-31-2010, 10:46 AM
  #6  
Doogie65
4th Gear Member
 
Doogie65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: WI
Posts: 1,898
Default

I am running the Steeda billets (poly/poly) and they have worked great at keeping my car straight in hard launches.
Doogie65 is offline  
Old 08-31-2010, 10:58 AM
  #7  
Sam Strano
Former Sponsor
 
Sam Strano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,936
Default

You don't want the axle moving fore and aft freely, but you want it to rotate freely so when you hit bumps or dips with one wheel that impact is not transmitted to the body fo the car. Think of a rock crawler and the articulation needed....

A more solid arm doesn't want to flex like stock. And the poly bushings don't want to flex either. You are basically making the rear suspension more rigid, the ride quality suffers as does the grip in the back of the car on imperfect surfaces.

Poly/poly works great for drag racing, and curing wheel hop--but there are better solutions (and not always more costly depending on the brand and product) for the other aspects of how you drive your car.
Sam Strano is offline  
Old 08-31-2010, 10:59 AM
  #8  
Kotobuki
3rd Gear Member
 
Kotobuki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 671
Default

acascianelli, the reason to use a LCA with a spherical bearing is that it allows the axle to properly articulate, reducing bind and the unwanted handling characteristics associated with it. With poly bushings at the axle, when one side is forced up (or down) relative to the chassis, a torsional force is applied through the LCA pivot, which the bushing tries to resist due to its stiffness. This can cause an effective and sudden increase in spring rate, which can upset the chassis. With a Spherical joint the axle is free to continue its travel without that added resistance, allowing for smoother articulation.
Kotobuki is offline  
Old 08-31-2010, 11:19 AM
  #9  
Norm Peterson
6th Gear Member
 
Norm Peterson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: state of confusion
Posts: 7,635
Default

Originally Posted by acascianelli
Why is having the spherical bearing better with the Steeda's?
Easiest way to visualize this is to picture yourself following the car as it rolls in a hard corner or when one rear wheel rolls over a bump.

In both cases, an angle is developed between the body and the axle - either the body rolling or one end of the axle moving up before the body "catches up" - which the end connections of the LCAs have to allow, otherwise the LCAs themselves have to twist. Any spherical joint/rod end/roto-joint/Johnny joint allows this angle to happen without the LCA itself being twisted in torsion. This also applies to the UCA.

Ride quality is better in most respects - your head doesn't get tossed from side to side nearly as much if the LCAs are freely permitting this rotation - and the amount of "lost" roll stiffness is not worth thinking about.


Norm

Last edited by Norm Peterson; 08-31-2010 at 11:23 AM.
Norm Peterson is offline  
Old 08-31-2010, 02:26 PM
  #10  
DRock
3rd Gear Member
 
DRock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Cali
Posts: 702
Default

And despite what people say i really didnt notice much if ane NVH when i installed my poly/rod end LCA's. If you have music on or the windows down or hell even a loud enough exaust you wont notice any noise.
DRock is offline  


Quick Reply: Which LCA to get for my 2007 GT



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:25 AM.