Notices
S197 Handling Section For everything suspension related, inlcuding brakes, tires, and wheels.

Reduce Tire/Fender gap

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-25-2011, 01:04 PM
  #11  
angryBits
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
angryBits's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 254
Default

Originally Posted by GT Premi
Having not read all the comments, get some big wheels with rubber band tires. (I so hate that ghetto look on Mustangs! ) As for the 1/2" lowering springs, yes they exist, but you'll have to get them from a dealer or OEM supplier. The SVT Performance Package springs lower the car ~1/2" up front and ~1/4" out back.
I'm not into the super low profile tire on muscle cars either.
I like a 30 - 40 side wall.

I'm actually less concerned about lowering the front, I really just want the back to be more even with the front, close to zero rake.
angryBits is offline  
Old 02-25-2011, 01:59 PM
  #12  
astentine
2nd Gear Member
 
astentine's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 338
Default

Originally Posted by angryBits
Right, but the SCT tuner will let you specify # of rotations per mile which is exactly (5148x12) / (diameter * PI).
Of course, I just wasn't sure if he already had one or planned on getting one. I wish I had one haha
astentine is offline  
Old 02-25-2011, 02:06 PM
  #13  
angryBits
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
angryBits's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 254
Default

Originally Posted by astentine
Of course, I just wasn't sure if he already had one or planned on getting one. I wish I had one haha
I don't have one yet either.
I'm hoping this will come out soon: http://www.engadget.com/photos/sct-itsx/
but if not I'll probably just get the regular tuner.

I also wanna do 4.10 gears but am holding off until I get the tuner.
angryBits is offline  
Old 02-25-2011, 02:10 PM
  #14  
astentine
2nd Gear Member
 
astentine's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 338
Default

I'm looking for a balance between power and economy, it's my daily driver, so 4.10s would be too much for me. I do, however, want to pick up and X-charger down the line. Add some power and keep the mileage!
astentine is offline  
Old 02-25-2011, 02:18 PM
  #15  
angryBits
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
angryBits's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 254
Default

Originally Posted by astentine
I'm looking for a balance between power and economy, it's my daily driver, so 4.10s would be too much for me. I do, however, want to pick up and X-charger down the line. Add some power and keep the mileage!
Yeah I've been thinking about the Ford Racing Supercharger.
I told myself when I bought the car that I would do it but I'm really liking the stock power. Maybe an intake, exhaust, 4.10 gears and tune and I'll be happy for awhile.

As far as gas mileage goes, well... between city and hwy 50/50, I average about 19-20mpg. That's way better than I thought I was going to get, so I think there's some room for 4.10s for me
angryBits is offline  
Old 02-25-2011, 02:21 PM
  #16  
astentine
2nd Gear Member
 
astentine's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 338
Default

Sounds good to me. I do mostly highway while in school and on a nice winter day with conservative driving, I've hit 33 mpg once or twice. typically 28 - 30 on highway the way I drive. The stock power of those 2011s are impressive. And intake and exhaust is a cheap(er) way of freeing up a little bit more power than a supercharger, go for it.
astentine is offline  
Old 02-25-2011, 02:32 PM
  #17  
angryBits
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
angryBits's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 254
Default

yeah definitely cheaper, but not nearly as much potential

The Ford Racing supercharger can make 525hp on 6lbs boost or 625hp on 9lbs boost with no other mods. That's crazy talk. But what's also crazy is the $6,000 price tag.

But if you think about it, intake, exhaust, gears and tune will cost me $2500 and get me ~40hp. $6000 can get me 625hp and I wouldn't need gears with that much power.

Very tempting, maybe for christmas
angryBits is offline  
Old 02-25-2011, 04:07 PM
  #18  
astentine
2nd Gear Member
 
astentine's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 338
Default

Well, when you put it that way... Those are very nice numbers though!
astentine is offline  
Old 02-25-2011, 04:21 PM
  #19  
angryBits
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
angryBits's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 254
Default

Yeah, but I wonder how often I'd get to use 600hp...
angryBits is offline  
Old 02-25-2011, 07:16 PM
  #20  
Norm Peterson
6th Gear Member
 
Norm Peterson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: state of confusion
Posts: 7,635
Default

Originally Posted by angryBits
(5148x12) / (diameter * PI).
Might want to check the value of that constant. I think it's closer to 5470 (bigger than 5280 for about 3.5% more revs per mile than a completely rigid tire of the same diameter would turn, or when simplified, about 20900/diameter.


Norm
Norm Peterson is offline  


Quick Reply: Reduce Tire/Fender gap



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:49 AM.