Notices
S197 Handling Section For everything suspension related, inlcuding brakes, tires, and wheels.

SMALLER rear sway bar...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-19-2014, 06:14 PM
  #1  
richardm
Thread Starter
 
richardm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: CA
Posts: 15
Default SMALLER rear sway bar...

So I have a Brembo pack suspension setup on my V6 plus Koni orange at the rear. Did the transplant about four months ago.

I got kinda fed up with the rear axle going full retard over broken pavement (it's like living in the 3rd world around here) so I removed the rear sway bar completely. Soooo plush but it's a little too soft back there. A little more low-speed damping from the Konis would help but I think the best compromise might be to return to a V6 rear swaybar. The V6 swaybar that I gave away. Like the idiot that I am.

Before I locate one on eBay or CL, any thoughts on this setup? The only alternative I see might be Laguna Seca springs (191 lb/ft vs 167) but I don't think the Konis nor the OEM track pack shocks would have enough low speed damping to run these springs with no sway bar.

I realize that it's never going to ride like a BMW 335 but the pure track pack setup just isn't tolerable.
richardm is offline  
Old 12-19-2014, 07:11 PM
  #2  
Kobie
2nd Gear Member
 
Kobie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location:
Posts: 151
Default

Don't want to stir up too much here, but I'd recommend putting the Brembo sway bar back on and switching to a Watts link. I know this made a HUGE difference in the way my car behaved.
Kobie is offline  
Old 12-19-2014, 08:52 PM
  #3  
UPRSharad
Former Sponsor
 
UPRSharad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: FL
Posts: 2,570
Default

There's no right or wrong answer here. Different bars for different setups and driving styles. One driver would like more rear bar than a different driver. And so on.

I can't really help on where to source an inexpensive softer rear bar... but I know I've seen some of the continental tire race mustangs with PUNY little rear bars. I heard they only run a rear "bar" because they have to in the rules, so they put these tiny little things on. Interestingly enough, that's probably why those cars power wheelie out of the corners and pic the inside front tire up off the ground. No rear roll control.
UPRSharad is offline  
Old 12-20-2014, 08:09 AM
  #4  
Norm Peterson
6th Gear Member
 
Norm Peterson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: state of confusion
Posts: 7,635
Default

The early-S197 GT Mustangs came with a 20mm rear bar. If anybody knows for sure that it would fit, that would at least widen your search.

Another possibility would be if anybody is letting go of one of Sam Strano's early 3-way adjustable rear bars, which were 22mm tubular. The full-soft setting is probably close to the OE 20mm solid.

It should be possible to weld (or maybe even bolt if you can drill holes to a close enough fit for the bolt shanks) extensions to the ends of the bar arms and drill the extensions to make the arms effectively longer, which in turn makes the bar softer. You'd have to keep an eye on clearances around the drop links and the transverse portion of the bar as those things move forward/backward as the suspension moves vertically.


Norm

Last edited by Norm Peterson; 12-20-2014 at 08:19 AM.
Norm Peterson is offline  
Old 12-20-2014, 02:47 PM
  #5  
richardm
Thread Starter
 
richardm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: CA
Posts: 15
Default

I take it Strano's current adjustable rear bar, on the softest setting, is not as soft as the V6 bar?

Last edited by richardm; 12-20-2014 at 02:49 PM.
richardm is offline  
Old 12-21-2014, 08:39 AM
  #6  
Norm Peterson
6th Gear Member
 
Norm Peterson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: state of confusion
Posts: 7,635
Default

Doubtful.

The soft setting on the 25mm Strano bar is listed at 162 lb/in, vs 96 lb/in that I have in my notes for a 20mm solid bar or about 147 lb/in for a 22mm solid bar.


Norm
Norm Peterson is offline  
Old 12-21-2014, 10:34 PM
  #7  
richardm
Thread Starter
 
richardm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: CA
Posts: 15
Default

Norm, can you share your sway bar notes? They could be useful in my search for mamma bear's porridge.
richardm is offline  
Old 12-22-2014, 08:01 AM
  #8  
Norm Peterson
6th Gear Member
 
Norm Peterson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: state of confusion
Posts: 7,635
Default

The 96 lb/in for the 20mm bar is based on Fred Puhn's sta-bar stiffness equation (in "How To Make Your Car Handle"), and the 147 is something I probably scaled up from there using 7/8" rather than precisely 22mm. The scale factor for identically bent sta-bars is the ratio of diameters raised to the 4th power. You'd use ( [OD}^4 - [ID}^4 ) for tubular bars.


To be picky (some might say too picky), those numbers are probably just a little high. There's a little uncertainty in the actual material stiffness property where his formula assumes a specific value, and if you expand Mr. Puhn's approach to include a few more structural deflection terms than just torsion in the center section and arm bending, you get a little more total deflection for a given load, which means softer. But they're small terms, unlikely to amount to much more than 5%, and realistically, worrying about a possible 5% error in 200 lb/in or less is a waste of time for any car that's still fully street-drivable.


I did track down a thread where a commercially-available rear bar was owner-modified to be adjustable over on FRRAX.com - and the individual involved is not a fabricator by profession. Link, with about 3 pages of follow-up text. You'd probably have to register in order to see the entire thread, but I do have a copy of the fabrication process saved to a Word document. Lots of pictures, so it still runs about 40 pages and about 5.5MB. PM me with an email address if you want a copy.


Norm




.
Norm Peterson is offline  
Old 12-24-2014, 08:18 AM
  #9  
Jande063
1st Gear Member
 
Jande063's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Virginia
Posts: 109
Default

Originally Posted by UPRSharad
There's no right or wrong answer here. Different bars for different setups and driving styles. One driver would like more rear bar than a different driver. And so on.

I can't really help on where to source an inexpensive softer rear bar... but I know I've seen some of the continental tire race mustangs with PUNY little rear bars. I heard they only run a rear "bar" because they have to in the rules, so they put these tiny little things on. Interestingly enough, that's probably why those cars power wheelie out of the corners and pic the inside front tire up off the ground. No rear roll control.
A lot of NASA AIX cars do that also, as well as Vorshlag's TT3 car, and of the two ESP mustangs that I have seen, mine waves that inside front tire at the course workers like a DSP BMW in drag (I do not remember if Jadrice's also does this, and his is the only other ESP mustang I have seen in person, but that was over a year ago). Another likely component is the enormous front bar that all of these cars run being so stiff that the coil spring has a difficult time overcoming both the bar and the rebound delay caused by the shocks. Chassis twist is another component, but much more difficult to solve.
Jande063 is offline  
Old 01-02-2015, 11:56 AM
  #10  
Robertatl123
 
Robertatl123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: GA
Posts: 32
Default

Richardm,

I plan on changing out both of my sway bars towards the end of this month. I have a '14 GT. I'm not sure on this, but I'm guessing the rear bar might be a little stiffer than the six. Let me know if you are interested.

Regards,

Robert
Robertatl123 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SSRFUZZY
Members Other Vehicles
6
01-06-2016 08:22 PM
tj@steeda
Steeda Autosports
0
09-16-2015 07:53 PM
robjh22
Suspension
0
09-08-2015 12:47 PM
RWHEELS
S197 Handling Section
4
09-05-2015 03:42 PM
cbird1177711
2005-2014 Mustangs
3
09-02-2015 08:51 PM



Quick Reply: SMALLER rear sway bar...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:38 AM.