Saleen, Roush and Boss Mustangs Discussions on Saleen, Roush, and late model Shinoda Boss Models within. SVT models, check the 4.6L section.

SMS 296 Supercharger with Duo-Path Induction for 2010 4.6L Mustang

Old 12-01-2009, 09:04 PM
  #1  
MoparMatt
Thread Starter
 
MoparMatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: La Habra Heights, California
Posts: 20
Default SMS 296 Supercharger with Duo-Path Induction for 2010 4.6L Mustang

Didn't see this posted here, but I got permission from SOEC to borrow the release and hotlink the images. You can see this new SMS Supercharger setup at the Los Angeles Auto Show during the next two weeks.


Las Vegas, NV – November 3 – SOEC/Saleen Forums News -- At the opening day of the 2009 SEMA Show, Steve M. Saleen and his SMS Supercars unveils the production version of the SMS 296 Supercharger™ System for the 2010 Mustang featuring the efficient SMS Duo-Path™ Induction (patent pending).

With over 30 years of racing and supercharger experience, Steve M. Saleen and the SMS design team have partnered with the leaders in the industry to create the ultimate solution for performance enthusiasts with their innovative SMS 296 Supercharger™ System. The new supercharger is able to boost under-hood horsepower by up to 45% in a variety of engine configurations. The SMS 296 Supercharger™ System is standard on the 475- and 650-horsepower 2010 SMS 460 Mustang, the 500- and 700-hp 2010 SMS 570 Challenger and the 550- to 750-hp 2010 SMS 620 Camaro. The system can also be ordered separately and installed into existing vehicles through SMS Superparts, Steve Saleen’s Performance Parts Division.

The SMS 296 Supercharger™ System is the eighth generation supercharger system to grace the engine bay of a Steve Saleen vehicle. This modular system is designed to fit a wide variety of modern vehicles and engines including Dodge Challenger R/T and SRT8, Chrysler 300, Charger R/T and SRT8, Camaro LS and two generations of Mustang GT.

SMS 296 Supercharger™ System features the LYS32M3 compressor module by Lysholm® for SMS, which puts out an astounding 32 cubic meters of air per minute. This patented screw compressor technology increases horsepower while reducing fuel consumption compared to similarly powered normally-aspirated engines.

SMS Six-Pack™ Intercooler System
The patented SMS Six-Pack™ Intercooler System features six cylindrical 0.2mm micro-fin Laminova® intercoolers which provide more than 60% additional cooling, flow efficiency, reduced pressure drop and air charge temperature cooling compared to traditional box-type intercoolers. This optimized system features 2.5 gallons of coolant, single-pass coolant flow, a 90 l/min water pump, dual-line coolant hoses and a high-volume dual pass heat exchanger to handle the most extreme horsepower configurations.

SMS Duo-Path™ Induction
The SMS 296 Supercharger™ System for the 2010 Mustang features the innovative, efficient and beautiful SMS Duo-Path™ Induction, which divides the cold air induction behind the throttle body and air box into two symmetric paths to the rear intake of the compressor. This dual-path system maximizes the flow cross section in the tight engine compartment of the Mustang, while also functioning as an aesthetic enhancement by obscuring the clutter associated with the top of the engine.

SMS Power Boost Efficiency
The innovation and internal efficiencies of the SMS 296 Supercharger™ System enable the system to deliver major horsepower gains within a 5-7 PSI boost range in most engine applications, with the benefit of reduced component fatigue for longer engine life.

SMS Tailor Made™ Options
The SMS 296 Supercharger™ System innovation continues on the outside as well with SMS Tailor Made™ custom finishes and powder coat color options for those horsepower enthusiasts who wish to match the impact under the hood to their rear wheel output! SMS offers custom-built systems to most specifications from its extensive list of options, including polishing, painting and anodizing of the castings and components.

SMS Superparts
At the 2009 SEMA Show, Steve Saleen also announced the formation of SMS Superparts. A subsidiary of SMS Supercars, the new venture will be a source for all Mustang, Mopar and Camaro enthusiasts to locally locally the new SMS296 Supercharger and have it installed.

Please visit www.smssupercars.com for more information. For a broad understanding of the workings of superchargers please visit http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supercharger.

SMS Supercars and SMS Superparts will be at the LA Auto Show in Concourse Hall.


Source: SMS Supercars and SOEC


SMS 296 Supercharger™ with SMS Duo-Path™ Induction for 2010 4.6L Mustang



SMS 296 installed on a 2010 Mustang GT



TailorMade options
MoparMatt is offline  
Old 12-02-2009, 04:34 AM
  #2  
LovinLife
1st Gear Member
 
LovinLife's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: PA
Posts: 54
Default

It does not make sense to me how sending air from the throttle body through two tubes, each with two corners, to the back of a blower can be as efficient as dumping it straight into the front. Is this more marketing hype? Why is it better to have reverse revolution?
LovinLife is offline  
Old 12-02-2009, 07:39 AM
  #3  
S281 E
5th Gear Member
 
S281 E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location:
Posts: 4,469
Default

^+1 I was thinking the same thing. Not sure how much more efficient this would be. I think Techo had it right with there design.
S281 E is offline  
Old 12-02-2009, 09:04 AM
  #4  
Werecow
2nd Gear Member
 
Werecow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 160
Default

Both designs probably have some merit. However, it sems there is a bigger hole in the back than in the front. So maybe you can actually cram more air into the back, I don't know if the difference is significant enough to see any gain in performance... Just seems that there is a lot more bends as well, which may actually lessen any benefit of having the bigger hole to feed.
Werecow is offline  
Old 12-02-2009, 07:40 PM
  #5  
LovinLife
1st Gear Member
 
LovinLife's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: PA
Posts: 54
Default

Originally Posted by Werecow
Both designs probably have some merit. However, it sems there is a bigger hole in the back than in the front. So maybe you can actually cram more air into the back, I don't know if the difference is significant enough to see any gain in performance... Just seems that there is a lot more bends as well, which may actually lessen any benefit of having the bigger hole to feed.
The air still has to run through a smaller throttle body. I'm going to have to call BS on all the efficiency claims.
LovinLife is offline  
Old 12-03-2009, 07:23 AM
  #6  
S281 E
5th Gear Member
 
S281 E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location:
Posts: 4,469
Default

he...he...he I would have to agree. Unless the throttle body is much larger I don't see the all the bends not affecting the air coming in.
S281 E is offline  
Old 12-06-2009, 09:06 AM
  #7  
Werecow
2nd Gear Member
 
Werecow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 160
Default

It would be nice to line up all these blower systems, Saleen, SMS, Kenne Bell and the Edelbrock, to see which system is truly the best. Someone like Kenne Bell, who has all that data logging equipment, would make a good candidate to run the test and someone like MM&FF to referee... It would be interesting to compare them all and see where their short comings and strengths lie.
Werecow is offline  
Old 12-06-2009, 11:30 AM
  #8  
sadface
2nd Gear Member
 
sadface's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 334
Default

power and flow claims aside jesus that thing is ugly imo
sadface is offline  
Old 12-06-2009, 12:14 PM
  #9  
LovinLife
1st Gear Member
 
LovinLife's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: PA
Posts: 54
Default

Originally Posted by Werecow
It would be nice to line up all these blower systems, Saleen, SMS, Kenne Bell and the Edelbrock, to see which system is truly the best. Someone like Kenne Bell, who has all that data logging equipment, would make a good candidate to run the test and someone like MM&FF to referee... It would be interesting to compare them all and see where their short comings and strengths lie.
I'm not sure why the Roush TVS blower doesn't get a mention here. The bottom line is that no matter what a blower is capable of the most important part of the equation is the calibration. I think thats where we've seen Saleen fail for years-too many tales of people buying new car and taking them for calibration to get them to run well. Now you're running on a tune that hasn't been proven out for durability or emissions compliance.
LovinLife is offline  
Old 12-06-2009, 04:39 PM
  #10  
Red_Devil
Official Sponsor For Whiteline USA
 
Red_Devil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Posts: 769
Default

The current Edelbrock system would win hands down.
Red_Devil is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: SMS 296 Supercharger with Duo-Path Induction for 2010 4.6L Mustang



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:03 PM.