Uh wow...
11-24-2008, 11:58 AM
#12
3rd Gear Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: CF,WI
Posts: 970
It was just a 2.0l wrx, and at the very end of the video you see a wagon. Also, judging by the tail lights if a wagon its a 02-03wrx, the slowest of them all. 227hp.
Stage 2 is a turbo back and a cai for a ~+15hp tune.
an 04-07 sti will run 13.5 with an average joe.
Stage 2 is a turbo back and a cai for a ~+15hp tune.
an 04-07 sti will run 13.5 with an average joe.
11-24-2008, 12:04 PM
#13
6th Gear Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Montaner
Posts: 6,193
Just a 2.0 and a wagon no less beat that 300hp LT1. So that little stage 2 wagon would beat a stock s197 then yes?
If you do a search for "camaro ss" on youtube one of the vids that comes up has a Terminator going up against a WRX (heavily modded, maybe stage 3) in a roll race. The Terminator barely beats him.
If you do a search for "camaro ss" on youtube one of the vids that comes up has a Terminator going up against a WRX (heavily modded, maybe stage 3) in a roll race. The Terminator barely beats him.
11-24-2008, 12:15 PM
#14
4th Gear Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,775
Stock STI's are very quick... They are much faster than stock S197's. There main competitor is the Lancer Evolution which is also very very quick.
Look at this modded STI: http://video.aol.com/video-detail/go...ion/1512170417
0-60: 3 seconds
0-100: 7.1 seconds
0-150: Less than 15 seconds.
Thats VERY quick.
Look at this modded STI: http://video.aol.com/video-detail/go...ion/1512170417
0-60: 3 seconds
0-100: 7.1 seconds
0-150: Less than 15 seconds.
Thats VERY quick.
11-24-2008, 12:25 PM
#15
3rd Gear Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: CF,WI
Posts: 970
Just a 2.0 and a wagon no less beat that 300hp LT1. So that little stage 2 wagon would beat a stock s197 then yes?
If you do a search for "camaro ss" on youtube one of the vids that comes up has a Terminator going up against a WRX (heavily modded, maybe stage 3) in a roll race. The Terminator barely beats him.
If you do a search for "camaro ss" on youtube one of the vids that comes up has a Terminator going up against a WRX (heavily modded, maybe stage 3) in a roll race. The Terminator barely beats him.
We've also got about 25% drag loss with awd as well, the seldom RWD conversions are monsters. But in Japan they get 2.0s that rev to 8500 all day stock..
11-24-2008, 12:25 PM
#16
Mista High School Playa
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 618
Just a 2.0 and a wagon no less beat that 300hp LT1. So that little stage 2 wagon would beat a stock s197 then yes?
If you do a search for "camaro ss" on youtube one of the vids that comes up has a Terminator going up against a WRX (heavily modded, maybe stage 3) in a roll race. The Terminator barely beats him.
If you do a search for "camaro ss" on youtube one of the vids that comes up has a Terminator going up against a WRX (heavily modded, maybe stage 3) in a roll race. The Terminator barely beats him.
11-24-2008, 12:45 PM
#19
6th Gear Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Montaner
Posts: 6,193
'95 LT1
300hp
3.42 standard axle ratio
2351 lb. curb weight
That is supposed to be SLOWER than a stock s197? Help me out here. That doesn't make much sense. Just as much HP, lighter, and 3.42 gearing?
300hp
3.42 standard axle ratio
2351 lb. curb weight
That is supposed to be SLOWER than a stock s197? Help me out here. That doesn't make much sense. Just as much HP, lighter, and 3.42 gearing?
11-24-2008, 12:55 PM
#20
2nd Gear Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 420
idk but camero lt1 vs s197 is a drivers race i think, im pretty sure of it also