SVT Forums

SVT focus VS SVT contour?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-27-2003, 12:34 AM
  #11  
mdvaldosta
I ♥ Acer
 
mdvaldosta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 8,826
Default SVT focus VS SVT contour?



This site lists these results...</P>


Focus SVT: 15.9 @ 90.2mph Contour SVT: 15.30 @ 91.8 mph</P>


http://www.car-videos.com/performance/distance.asp?dist=1320</P>


</P>


Also Road and track magazine lists the SVT Focus in the quarter:</P>


15.8 @ 88.9 mph</P>


and the SVT Contour in the quarter at:</P>


15.4 @ 91.5 mph</P>


</P>


I think its pretty safe to say that you just don't know when to stop bumping threads... do you? Avan's numbers could easily be accurate at a different track at higher elevations or poor conditions, as the numbers are proportional to what ALL the other comparison tests come to from ALL the other people that ran them.</P>
mdvaldosta is offline  
Old 09-27-2003, 02:47 AM
  #12  
Redline5th
3rd Gear Member
 
Redline5th's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 802
Default SVT focus VS SVT contour?



T5 has posted 7 times, use the edit button! </P>


<FONT size=6>NOT 7 Stinking times! lol!</FONT></P><edited><editID>Redline5th</editID><editDate>37891.0439930556</editDate></edited>
Redline5th is offline  
Old 09-27-2003, 02:54 AM
  #13  
Jugador1
I ♥ Acer
 
Jugador1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 2,963
Default SVT focus VS SVT contour?

lol, you've had your days post whoring too...hell, who hasnt? but eventually you wise up to the fact that it really makes you look like an *** pirate
Jugador1 is offline  
Old 09-27-2003, 02:30 PM
  #14  
mdvaldosta
I ♥ Acer
 
mdvaldosta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 8,826
Default SVT focus VS SVT contour?



its one thing to post usless spam, its another to post back to back to back to back... seriously thats just annoying.</P>


*** pirate? I gotta use that one sometime <IMG src=smileys/smiley2.gif border="0"></P>
mdvaldosta is offline  
Old 09-27-2003, 02:34 PM
  #15  
Jugador1
I ♥ Acer
 
Jugador1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 2,963
Default SVT focus VS SVT contour?

i know, its so funny isnt it?
Jugador1 is offline  
Old 09-27-2003, 05:08 PM
  #16  
T5superduty
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
T5superduty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 862
Default SVT focus VS SVT contour?

Any way ask anyone that works at Shoshop or anywhere and they will tell you that the SVT Contour would need a few upgrades to run low 15s. I luv them but there not that fast. ShoShop specializes in parts for the SVt contour I think if anyone really knew, they would.
T5superduty is offline  
Old 09-27-2003, 07:36 PM
  #17  
Redline5th
3rd Gear Member
 
Redline5th's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 802
Default SVT focus VS SVT contour?

make that 8 I'm just kiddin' around
Redline5th is offline  
Old 09-27-2003, 09:12 PM
  #18  
T5superduty
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
T5superduty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 862
Default SVT focus VS SVT contour?

<FONT size=6>9</FONT> <edited><editID>T5superduty</editID><editDate>37891.8009722222</editDate></edited>
T5superduty is offline  
Old 09-27-2003, 09:14 PM
  #19  
T5superduty
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
T5superduty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 862
Default SVT focus VS SVT contour?

<FONT size=6>10 </FONT><FONT size=2>and what do you guys think of the Twin Turbo SHO. You think it would be a good idea and it would sell or what ?</FONT>
T5superduty is offline  
Old 09-27-2003, 10:30 PM
  #20  
AVanGorder
 
AVanGorder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 22
Default SVT focus VS SVT contour?

Full sized cars that are also "musclecars" are very appealing to the middel aged man that also has more money than the average 19 year old.
AVanGorder is offline  


Quick Reply: SVT focus VS SVT contour?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:44 AM.