What do you think about the weight of the 2015 Mustang? - Page 3 - MustangForums.com



The New S550 2015-2017 Mustang Discussions on the newest generation of the Ford Mustang.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Reply
 
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-14-2014, 05:20 AM   #21
moosestang
6th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 11,278
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jz78817 View Post
incorrect. "Curb weight" is a very specific term. It's the weight of the vehicle with all fluids, all consumables, a full tank of fuel, but no passengers or cargo. What you're referring to would be "dry weight."
I know the definition of curb weight. that list from the dealer doesn't mention curb weight or dry weight.

Actually it does say Base curb weight. maybe this is a new dealer term. So the premium gt will weigh quite a bit more than that?

Last edited by moosestang; 06-14-2014 at 05:23 AM.
moosestang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2014, 09:53 AM   #22
jz78817
4th Gear Member
 
jz78817's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,325
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by moosestang View Post
I know the definition of curb weight. that list from the dealer doesn't mention curb weight or dry weight.

Actually it does say Base curb weight.
Ok then, glad we cleared that up.

Quote:
maybe this is a new dealer term.
no it isn't; it's the curb weight of the base model of each configuration.

Quote:
So the premium gt will weigh quite a bit more than that?
not necessarily since many options involve replacing a component with a different one, and not just slapping on more stuff.
jz78817 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2014, 01:15 PM   #23
99GTvert
is my username.
 
99GTvert's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Earth
Posts: 13,273
Default

Wow...can't say that I've ever seen anyone nitpick curb weight vs dry weight. So how much more do the extra fluids weigh?
99GTvert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2014, 04:16 PM   #24
bluebeastsrt
6th Gear Member
 
bluebeastsrt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Jersey
Posts: 11,548
Default

Depends on if it drank cool aid or Jack Daniels.
bluebeastsrt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2014, 04:29 PM   #25
jz78817
4th Gear Member
 
jz78817's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,325
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 99GTvert View Post
Wow...can't say that I've ever seen anyone nitpick curb weight vs dry weight. So how much more do the extra fluids weigh?
water is roughly 8 lbs per gallon, oil/gas/petroleum fluids are a bit over 7 lbs/gal.
jz78817 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2014, 04:45 PM   #26
AK_Kayaker
3rd Gear Member
 
AK_Kayaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Anchorage, AK
Posts: 898
Default

So it could be about 100Lbs more, if those weights are without fuel and windshield washer fluid, as I'm pretty sure, engine oil and antifreeze come pre filled from the factory.
AK_Kayaker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2014, 06:49 PM   #27
jz78817
4th Gear Member
 
jz78817's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,325
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AK_Kayaker View Post
So it could be about 100Lbs more, if those weights are without fuel and windshield washer fluid, as I'm pretty sure, engine oil and antifreeze come pre filled from the factory.
*sigh* I've already said "curb weight" is with all fluids filled to specified capacity and a full tank of fuel. why are we still arguing about this?
jz78817 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2014, 02:13 AM   #28
JIM5.0
5th Gear Member
 
JIM5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 4,404
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jz78817 View Post
the weight gain is minor, at best:

http://jalopnik.com/the-2015-mustang...nds-1590194961

which is good. I was expecting maybe 100-150 lbs, so kudos to Ford for keeping the weight gain as small as it is.

I wouldn't write off Steeda just yet. Those S550 weight figures could be just for the bare stripped down weights of each trim; i.e. no Premium subtrim/packages and definitely no options whatsoever.

Add Premium subtrim/package and fully option out everything and a GT fastback (not convertible) could hit that +300lbf mark that Steeda is estimating.

With the use of heavy steel to build this car, plus all that extra European pedestrian crash safety equipment, not to mention the heavier IRS, I admit I'm impressed that Ford did not increase the GT coupe (fastback) by only 90-97lbf more than the 2011-14 S197 GT. For the reasons I already said, I assume that the weight given by Jaloponik is for the 301A GT fastback with no options and no Premium subtrim/package.
Still, Ford could have saved more weight. Look what they did for the F150: Going almost all aluminum saved a massive amount of weight from their heavy trucks. I wonder if this avenue could have done the same for the S550? At the very least, saving weight with lighter metal parts could have allowed Ford to put in stronger IRS spindles (halfshafts) so that we Mustang fans would not have to go through the very same suffering that Camaro SS owners have experienced with just bolt-on N/A engine mods.

If I break down to buy the S550, I for one will not buy the MY 2015 S550. I will at the very least wait until MY 2016 when all the weaknesses are known and either Ford makes subsequent improvements or the aftermarket offers better and stronger mod parts than the OEM. My first goal will to get rid of all the weak and underpar bushings in the IRS to get rid of the slop that is sure to be present especially under WOT on even the stock 435BHP Coyote. Ford will absolutely no doubt put in too soft of bushings for the sake of that daily driving ride that they always place above supporting the 400+BHP power of their engines.
My second goal (actually, preferably at the same time as replacing he IRS bushings) would be to get rid of the stock IRS spindles and put in stronger ones to avoid what the Camaso SS owners have discovered.

If Ford executes the S550 production very well with little bugs and if they actually decide to sacrifice some daily driving NVH to give more improved performance and durability, that will be an absolutely pleasant surprise that I will very gladly welcome with open arms; and that just might be enough to push me to buy a MY2015 S550 GT coupe (fastback).
JIM5.0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2014, 07:53 AM   #29
jz78817
4th Gear Member
 
jz78817's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,325
Default

Quote:
I wouldn't write off Steeda just yet. Those S550 weight figures could be just for the bare stripped down weights of each trim; i.e. no Premium subtrim/packages and definitely no options whatsoever.

Add Premium subtrim/package and fully option out everything and a GT fastback (not convertible) could hit that +300lbf mark that Steeda is estimating.
I've already written them off since they admitted they just pulled that number out of their ***. Base curb weight means the same thing on S550 as it does for S197.

Quote:
Still, Ford could have saved more weight. Look what they did for the F150: Going almost all aluminum saved a massive amount of weight from their heavy trucks. I wonder if this avenue could have done the same for the S550?
sure they could have. Would you be willing to pay $35,000 for a base V6 Mustang?

Last edited by jz78817; 06-15-2014 at 07:56 AM.
jz78817 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2014, 12:36 PM   #30
pascal
S197 Section Modder-ator
 
pascal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Orlando FL
Posts: 13,320
Default

There are ways to reduce weight without going to an all aluminum body.
Carpeting and door/side panels (basically upholstery) are much too heavy for what they are.
They found a way to to lighten this crap up on airplanes (for obvious reasons) so the solution exists.
Make the car smaller is another very efficient way to trim weight without making the Stang as small as a Fiat 500. Lol

For the new all aluminum F150, Ford says that it won't be really more expensive than the current truck.
I know one thing though, the price of a door shell for example, won't be in the same ball park than a metal one, not even close.
Repairing this truck won't be cheap and Ins. Cies already have policies in mind to match the extra expenses.
pascal is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
**New...from NAT! 2015 Ford Mustang MRT Rear Window Louvers**Free shipping! NorthAmericanTuning Vendor For Sale / Group Buy Classifieds 5 11-09-2016 11:45 AM
**New from NAT!2015 Ford Mustang MRT Rear Window Louvers**Free Shipping! NorthAmericanTuning The New S550 2015-2017 Mustang 3 03-18-2016 11:21 AM
More hp to 2015 mustang gt Bobbyg74 The New S550 2015-2017 Mustang 6 08-14-2015 01:31 AM
2015 Mustang Oil Change Help OBleedingMe The New S550 2015-2017 Mustang 0 08-08-2015 12:02 PM


Tags
2015mustang, ford mustang

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:35 PM.