S550 2015-2023 Mustang Discussions on the S550 2015 - 2022 Ford Mustang.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

What do you think about the weight of the 2015 Mustang?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 16, 2014 | 01:40 PM
  #31  
Cruzinaround's Avatar
Cruzinaround
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 616
From: PA
Default

The spinning process for both Steel and Aluminum are not different. The costs of materials would be slightly more expensive for Aluminum, but the costs tend to fluctuate where the two materials don't tip the scale of cost either way. There are other ways to save weight and cost besides an aluminum frame. The use of plastics and ABS for sheathing the entire vehicle is not uncommon in many other common sports cars. Cheaper auto-lathe methods and advancements for carbon fiber fabrication and printed parts are also becoming more common.

The technologies coming down the road are extremely exciting. So writing off Ford for not improving upon what is about to hit the streets in the following years would be rather naive.

Just saying

---
Old Jun 16, 2014 | 08:39 PM
  #32  
pascal's Avatar
pascal
S197 Section Modder-ator
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 13,373
From: Orlando FL
Default

Aluminum is more expensive due to the mining process.
It's harder to refine than regular steel despite the fact that it's one of the most plentiful mineral available on the planet.

Who talked about aluminum frame? Not on the F150 I hope.
Old Jun 16, 2014 | 09:16 PM
  #33  
908ssp's Avatar
908ssp
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 645
From: Michigan
Default

It has been awhile so obviously the cost is higher but not long ago the material cost in the typical car was less than $200 when purchased in the kind of quantities that the auto industry does.
Old Jun 17, 2014 | 05:54 AM
  #34  
jz78817's Avatar
jz78817
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,329
From: Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by pascal
Aluminum is more expensive due to the mining process.
It's harder to refine than regular steel despite the fact that it's one of the most plentiful mineral available on the planet.
yup. it's why industry has always been so keen on recycling aluminum. It's a lot cheaper and easier to reuse scrap aluminum metal than it is to refine it from ore.

Who talked about aluminum frame? Not on the F150 I hope.
the F-150 still has a steel ladder frame. Being a unit-body, the Mustang doesn't have a "frame" per se, the body itself is the structure.
Old Jun 17, 2014 | 12:24 PM
  #35  
MustangInTexas's Avatar
MustangInTexas
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 308
From: Texas
Default

But front fenders, doors and hood/trunk lids are not part of that structure. They could be made of any material while leaving the "structure" made of steel.
Old Jun 17, 2014 | 03:15 PM
  #36  
Cruzinaround's Avatar
Cruzinaround
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 616
From: PA
Default

Then a Subframe of Steel and top frame of Aluminum... Sheathed in a mix of Aluminum and/or Carbon and/or Plastics and/or Ceramics.

The concept of running on a frame instead of a uni-body chassis is not very different from this...


And if you consider that the push is to go green and eco-friendly...then it makes more sense to use parts fabricated from recycled aluminum...which would in fact be cheaper than Steel.

For that matter you can throw in components from recycled plastics. And even ceramic parts. Or tubular parts manufactured from Aluminum or Steel instead of solid members...like the Sway bars for example.

Innovation is just spanking Ford all over this. They just need to pick up the torch and incorporate much of what we've gained from the hypercar segment.

---
Old Jun 20, 2014 | 06:13 PM
  #37  
Cruzinaround's Avatar
Cruzinaround
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 616
From: PA
Default

And Ford already is pulling new tricks to lighten the car....I'm sure we'll benefit from more tweaks from the engineers coming down the road....

http://jalopnik.com/the-2015-mustang...urce=pulsenews

Just saying...

---
Old Jul 9, 2014 | 07:53 PM
  #38  
kyledugan07gt's Avatar
kyledugan07gt
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 15
From: Maryland
Default

Sadly, I suspect this car will be heavier as it has independent rear suspension, which is supposed to be heavier than the old solid rear axle.
Old Jul 11, 2014 | 01:45 PM
  #39  
Cruzinaround's Avatar
Cruzinaround
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 616
From: PA
Default

Remove...spare tire = 40lbs. Remove tire Jack = 10lbs. Remove rear bench = 30lbs.

Then you'll weigh the same as a 2014.

Swap Drive Shaft, Wheels, Sway bars and you'll be lighter than a 2014.

Lose 50lbs on our own bodies....won't hurt ... might even live longer to enjoy the new s550's.

;-)

---
Old Jul 12, 2014 | 09:49 PM
  #40  
mustlemn's Avatar
mustlemn
Thread Starter
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 75
From: NC
Default

I guess weight may not be a bad thing as it may help to make the driving experience solid, just bad for MPG, but Mustang buyers aren't buying it concerned with MPG.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:06 AM.