The Racers Bench Is the track just too much for you? Want to know what will beat what? Talk about it here!!

Stock Mach 1?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-08-2009, 10:22 AM
  #11  
72MachOne99GT
2010 Blue Ball Award Recipient
 
72MachOne99GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Eskimo Village, Indiana *No Igloo*
Posts: 7,907
Default

Yes, but you've got your exceptions of course..

A fair driver his first few times out is probably going to run mid 13's around 104-105 in a Mach, where as a super great driver in a LT1 with a 6sp could probably touch the same area...13.5-13.7's or so...

but, that's basing my predictions off some of the BEST EVER stock LT1 times I've EVER seen .
72MachOne99GT is offline  
Old 04-08-2009, 06:06 PM
  #12  
tspence45
4th Gear Member
 
tspence45's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Monmouth, IL
Posts: 1,879
Default

Originally Posted by 72MachOne99GT
Yes, but you've got your exceptions of course..

A fair driver his first few times out is probably going to run mid 13's around 104-105 in a Mach, where as a super great driver in a LT1 with a 6sp could probably touch the same area...13.5-13.7's or so...

but, that's basing my predictions off some of the BEST EVER stock LT1 times I've EVER seen .
Well, the best ever stock LT1 time is something like a 13.2 or a 13.3 in a '96 SS (SS's actually made a little more power than Z28's in LT1's, unlike the LS1's). But, I think it was only done once, and by a professional. There have actually been a lot of guys that have hit the 13.5-13.6 mark though, suprisingly. But, the average driver is just going to be in the bottom 14's and high 13's. A 5speed Mach 1 should beat it every time. A stock 6speed LT1 would be a good race for a stock auto Mach though.
tspence45 is offline  
Old 04-08-2009, 06:22 PM
  #13  
94Blk5.0
5th Gear Member
 
94Blk5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: NC
Posts: 2,112
Default

Originally Posted by tspence45
Well, the best ever stock LT1 time is something like a 13.2 or a 13.3 in a '96 SS (SS's actually made a little more power than Z28's in LT1's, unlike the LS1's). But, I think it was only done once, and by a professional. There have actually been a lot of guys that have hit the 13.5-13.6 mark though, suprisingly. But, the average driver is just going to be in the bottom 14's and high 13's. A 5speed Mach 1 should beat it every time. A stock 6speed LT1 would be a good race for a stock auto Mach though.
Is it just me, or does this number keep getting lower and lower?
94Blk5.0 is offline  
Old 04-08-2009, 06:30 PM
  #14  
Stone629
6th Gear Member
 
Stone629's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 11,302
Default

Originally Posted by tspence45
Well, the best ever stock LT1 time is something like a 13.2 or a 13.3 in a '96 SS (SS's actually made a little more power than Z28's in LT1's, unlike the LS1's). But, I think it was only done once, and by a professional. There have actually been a lot of guys that have hit the 13.5-13.6 mark though, suprisingly. But, the average driver is just going to be in the bottom 14's and high 13's. A 5speed Mach 1 should beat it every time. A stock 6speed LT1 would be a good race for a stock auto Mach though.
The rumor about automatic Machs being slower is mostly BS. They are not like the automatic New Edge GTs vs the New Edge manual GTs. Mine went 13.3 @ 105 mph with a CATTED X-pipe only. The auto Machs are mid 13 second cars stock...... magazine times ftl!
Stone629 is offline  
Old 04-08-2009, 09:14 PM
  #15  
tspence45
4th Gear Member
 
tspence45's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Monmouth, IL
Posts: 1,879
Default

Originally Posted by 94Blk5.0
Is it just me, or does this number keep getting lower and lower?
I don't know. That's what I've always heard. I also know that there were a couple places that had them rated at 13.4, but most had them in the 13.6-13.8 area. This was for SS's of course. Z28's were always rated anywhere from a low-mid 14.
tspence45 is offline  
Old 04-08-2009, 10:29 PM
  #16  
k0261886
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
k0261886's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 174
Default

Originally Posted by tspence45
Well, the best ever stock LT1 time is something like a 13.2 or a 13.3 in a '96 SS (SS's actually made a little more power than Z28's in LT1's, unlike the LS1's). But, I think it was only done once, and by a professional. There have actually been a lot of guys that have hit the 13.5-13.6 mark though, suprisingly. But, the average driver is just going to be in the bottom 14's and high 13's. A 5speed Mach 1 should beat it every time. A stock 6speed LT1 would be a good race for a stock auto Mach though.
Weren't these LT4 cars?
k0261886 is offline  
Old 04-09-2009, 01:56 AM
  #17  
83gtragtop
5th Gear Member
 
83gtragtop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: DTLA, CA
Posts: 4,897
Default

Originally Posted by k0261886
Weren't these LT4 cars?
The LT4 was a special high-performance version of the new-generation LT1. With the addition of a slightly more aggressive camshaft profile, 1.6:1 roller aluminum rocker arms and better-flowing intake manifold (painted red) and cylinder heads, it was rated at 330 horsepower (250 kW) and 340 lb·ft (461 N·m). It was introduced in the 1996 model year, for the last year of the C4 Corvette, and came standard on all manual transmission (ZF 6-speed equipped) C4 Corvettes. The engine was passed down to special versions of the Camaro and Firebird the next model year.
The LT4 was available on the following vehicles:
  • 1996 Chevrolet Corvette when equipped with 6-speed manual transmission (includes all Grand Sports) (Production: 6,359)
  • 1997 Chevrolet Camaro SLP/LT4 SS 6-speed (Production: 100 for the U.S., 6 for Canada. There were 2 prototypes)
  • 1997 Pontiac Firebird SLP/LT4 Firehawk 6-speed (Production: 29)
All 135 production engines for the Firehawks and Camaro SS were completely disassembled, balanced, blueprinted and honed with stress plates. One in 5 engines was tested on a Superflow engine dyno and every car was tested on a chassis dyno in addition to performing a short 6-mile (10 km) road test.
......
83gtragtop is offline  
Old 04-09-2009, 10:55 AM
  #18  
k0261886
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
k0261886's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 174
Default

Damn, I just got owned, lol. Ya, I knew they came around in 1996, but couldn't remember if they made their way to the SS in 96 or 97. Thanks for the help ragtop!
k0261886 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ccdguy
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
1
09-19-2015 05:20 PM
Big Al's 03
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
2
09-16-2015 07:31 PM
Big Al's 03
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
5
09-15-2015 09:05 AM
TimeLord101
New Member Area
3
09-04-2015 09:27 AM
iamgobono
General Tech
0
09-03-2015 12:37 PM



Quick Reply: Stock Mach 1?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:52 AM.