The Racers Bench Is the track just too much for you? Want to know what will beat what? Talk about it here!!

new edge vs 2010

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-14-2010, 02:29 PM
  #11  
83gtragtop
5th Gear Member
 
83gtragtop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: DTLA, CA
Posts: 4,897
Default

Originally Posted by swat 79
new edge's around 14.2 (averages)

new 2010's around 13.3 (averages)

to beat him, he'd need to make up about a second worth of time in the quarter right?
Averages for a 2010 will be nowhere near 13.3! The fastest anyone ran in a stock '05/'09 3v was 13.27 I believe. 15hp is not going to change that by much.
83gtragtop is offline  
Old 01-14-2010, 02:31 PM
  #12  
mrtstang
6th Gear Member
 
mrtstang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: MI
Posts: 5,884
Default

I think the op just has the mods mentioned in his sig. I don't know for sure, but he didn't state otherwise.

I was just stating my opinions against a full bolt on, geared , and tuned new edge gt. I'm sure in the op's case it will be much closer.
mrtstang is offline  
Old 01-14-2010, 02:34 PM
  #13  
ChalknCover
Sgt. Killjoy
 
ChalknCover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: DMV
Posts: 2,090
Default

Mods listed is what I am looking at. I don't see anything that other than the gears and midpipe that would give him anything extra. I see the 10 getting this one.

That was a pretty good vid though it does matter who is driving.
ChalknCover is offline  
Old 01-14-2010, 02:42 PM
  #14  
swat 79
2nd Gear Member
 
swat 79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Nj
Posts: 469
Default

Originally Posted by bolton3valve
na its not that big of a diffrence stick new edges are high 13 cars
didn't know that, my mistake.
swat 79 is offline  
Old 01-14-2010, 02:54 PM
  #15  
72MachOne99GT
2010 Blue Ball Award Recipient
 
72MachOne99GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Eskimo Village, Indiana *No Igloo*
Posts: 7,907
Default

The OP's car is a mid 13 second car with a set of DR's and a competent driver.

Thats close enough to ET about the same as a 'fair to average' driver in a '05-'10...

Having said that, it's the 2010 Drivers race to win or lose...but not by a whole lot..

unless you're talking about roll racing...then it's ugly early.
72MachOne99GT is offline  
Old 01-14-2010, 03:17 PM
  #16  
bluebeastsrt
6th Gear Member
 
bluebeastsrt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Jersey
Posts: 11,565
Default

Originally Posted by 83gtragtop
Averages for a 2010 will be nowhere near 13.3! The fastest anyone ran in a stock '05/'09 3v was 13.27 I believe. 15hp is not going to change that by much.

I agree. I'm pretty sure the "AVERAGE" for a 2010 Mustang would be in the 13.8 range. I think 14.2 is a fair average for the new edge. It'll take a pretty good driver to run in the high 13s for a completely stock new edge. Very similar to stock SRT-4 times. Good drivers can do it but most kids run low to mid 14s.

Last edited by bluebeastsrt; 01-14-2010 at 03:22 PM.
bluebeastsrt is offline  
Old 01-14-2010, 03:23 PM
  #17  
83gtragtop
5th Gear Member
 
83gtragtop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: DTLA, CA
Posts: 4,897
Default

Originally Posted by bluebeastsrt

I agree. I'm pretty sure the "AVERAGE" for a 2010 Mustang would be in the 13.8 range. I think 14.2 is a fair average for the new edge. It'll take a pretty good driver to run in the high 13s. Very similar to stock SRT-4 times. Good drivers can do it but most kids run low to mid 14s.
I concur.
83gtragtop is offline  
Old 01-14-2010, 03:56 PM
  #18  
swat 79
2nd Gear Member
 
swat 79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Nj
Posts: 469
Default

Originally Posted by 83gtragtop
Averages for a 2010 will be nowhere near 13.3! The fastest anyone ran in a stock '05/'09 3v was 13.27 I believe. 15hp is not going to change that by much.


15 hp maybe not, but with the 3.73 rear axle, 13.3 is not impossible by any means, and if you factor in the track pack, low low 13's is very possible. Don't discount the minor suspension components either, they help out a good bit (both stock, and with the track pack option)


13.8 as an average for a 2010? Respectfully man, that's just ridiculous. I know you know your ****, but if magazines are running consistent 13.5's, think about someone who actually owns the car and has a chance to get to the track often.
swat 79 is offline  
Old 01-14-2010, 04:30 PM
  #19  
SilverGT03
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
SilverGT03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Wellington, Florida
Posts: 602
Default

Originally Posted by swat 79
15 hp maybe not, but with the 3.73 rear axle, 13.3 is not impossible by any means, and if you factor in the track pack, low low 13's is very possible. Don't discount the minor suspension components either, they help out a good bit (both stock, and with the track pack option)


13.8 as an average for a 2010? Respectfully man, that's just ridiculous. I know you know your ****, but if magazines are running consistent 13.5's, think about someone who actually owns the car and has a chance to get to the track often.
Magazines are going to be a lot different then your typical guy at the track. Some will do better than that 13.5 but I bet 8 out of 10 people would run around the 13.8 area as stated above.

And sorry It took so long for me to respond guys, I had a full day of classes..
I do plan on getting a set of cms stage II cams or stage II comp cams sometime over the summer so I figure that will help a good amount =)
SilverGT03 is offline  
Old 01-14-2010, 04:43 PM
  #20  
Fobra
Banned
 
Fobra's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location:
Posts: 4,064
Default

It seems to me that most mag tests are pretty good average driver real world numbers.
Fobra is offline  


Quick Reply: new edge vs 2010



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:44 AM.