2011 challenger SRT-8 - Page 2 - MustangForums.com


The Racers Bench Is the track just too much for you? Want to know what will beat what? Talk about it here!!
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Reply
 
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-28-2011, 01:33 PM   #11
67mustang302
6th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: California
Posts: 10,468
Default

The fact that Dodge can't get a 4,200lb car with under 500hp to hook up is a testament to the fact that they have extremely poor design. Even the Mustangs can hook their power extremely well with a very inexpensive suspension package in a lighter car.

But let's talk about other cars....Dodge Viper puts 600/3,400lbs down easily with no traction control. Or taken to the absolute extreme, the SSC Ultimate Aero puts 1,200+hp down with no traction control in a 2,750lb car.....so don't tell me it's just the big tires.

Dodge simply has bad development teams. Their body design teams are awesome, the new Chally is the best looking car out there. But their suspension and chassis design teams clearly suck. The powertrain is decent, but it's stuffed into a battlecruiser. They must have fired the Viper team or something, because they seemed to ignore the lessons from developing that car.
67mustang302 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2011, 01:42 PM   #12
Mishri
Mish-ogynist
Thread Starter
 
Mishri's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Great Falls, MT
Posts: 3,764
Default

I think it would be a good time for Ford to bring back another 2 seater like the GT. maybe just stick a turbo'd 5.0 in it.. try to get it priced in z06 territory.. use a bunch of weight savings to get it down to a 3200lbs range? then they could even just throw it on an s197 chassis.
Mishri is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2011, 02:36 PM   #13
mrtstang
6th Gear Member
 
mrtstang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: MI
Posts: 5,884
Default

I just saw one on a Dynojet, and it put down 430 rwhp. If they can achieve those numbers consistantly then it appears that they might be a bit underated at 470 hp.
mrtstang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2011, 03:23 PM   #14
bluebeastsrt
6th Gear Member
 
bluebeastsrt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Jersey
Posts: 11,559
Default

Kinda like the guy that posted a 390 dyno sheet for a 5.0 were the average seams to be 350-360??? I dont believe in factory freaks.
bluebeastsrt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2011, 03:38 PM   #15
okbfd
4th Gear Member
 
okbfd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: OK
Posts: 1,883
Default

If they are going to be charging that much for the top end Chally it should be a SRT-10
okbfd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2011, 04:48 PM   #16
Stone629
6th Gear Member
 
Stone629's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 11,301
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bluebeastsrt View Post
I dont believe in factory freaks.
That makes two of us.
Stone629 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2011, 06:15 PM   #17
67mustang302
6th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: California
Posts: 10,468
Default

Dynos lie.

Unless someone shows me an ASE certified dyno with an engine tested under SAE standards, as far as I'm concerned the numbers are BS. They may be accurate in some cases, but with 0 oversight, who's to say?

Dynos are tuning and development tools, nothing more. And besides, if dynos are so great for measuring performance, why is the last phase of vehicle development performance testing ALWAYS done with actual driving in an actual car with a crapton of data logging? Because they don't care about what the engine does on a dyno, they care about what it does in a car. The dyno is just there to help them get the engine to a baseline.
67mustang302 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2011, 06:44 PM   #18
mrtstang
6th Gear Member
 
mrtstang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: MI
Posts: 5,884
Default

I agree about the dyno thing...beleive me lol! I've been on a few different dynojet dynos, and have seen wild fluctuations.
mrtstang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2011, 08:09 PM   #19
Stone629
6th Gear Member
 
Stone629's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 11,301
Default

I need to remove the dyno numbers from my sig. I agree with everything above.
Stone629 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2011, 08:33 PM   #20
3.0Taurass
3rd Gear Member
 
3.0Taurass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: MN
Posts: 860
Default

I think dodge should have reduced the weight and kept the same engine as opposed to keeping the weight and changing the engine. Once you buy a car you can always make it have more power but taking excess weight out is something people can't or won't do
3.0Taurass is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New guy in AZ. First Mustang, First Manual, First car. BeatnikFink New Member Area 6 10-01-2015 08:00 PM
2013 Mustang GT vs 2014 SS Sedan heslekrants Street/Strip 11 09-23-2015 04:02 PM
whats next? RWHEELS S197 Handling Section 4 09-05-2015 03:42 PM
Switched up Tunes whatsup62 5.0L GT S550 Tech 3 08-11-2015 08:45 AM
exhaust leak at Crossover? 11GTBlu 5.0L V8 Technical Discussions 2 08-10-2015 05:56 PM


Tags
12s, 2011, anderson, challenger, limiter, pipe, power, rev, srt

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:45 PM.