The Racers Bench Is the track just too much for you? Want to know what will beat what? Talk about it here!!

Turbo PSI converted into engine displacement

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-07-2011, 09:30 AM
  #11  
bluebeastsrt
6th Gear Member
 
bluebeastsrt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Jersey
Posts: 11,565
Default

I think your onto something there PD. A .75 (Real big) turbo will make more power at 15PSI than a .28 (smallish) turbo at 27PSI.
bluebeastsrt is offline  
Old 10-07-2011, 02:14 PM
  #12  
perfect.disguise
5th Gear Member
 
perfect.disguise's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: VA
Posts: 2,374
Default

Haha, I actually had a guy want to trade me a GT37r for my old 50trim. Though I will never (I believe) push 700+whp so I decided not to. Besides, I would never go back to a journal bearing turbo.
perfect.disguise is offline  
Old 10-07-2011, 08:55 PM
  #13  
67mustang302
6th Gear Member
 
67mustang302's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: California
Posts: 10,468
Default

http://www.epi-eng.com/piston_engine..._cup_to_f1.htm

Something similar, though dealing more with naturally aspirated engines. It does give some good information for realistic comparisons of engines though.
67mustang302 is offline  
Old 10-07-2011, 09:25 PM
  #14  
Stone629
6th Gear Member
 
Stone629's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 11,302
Default

Out of all that technical info, I pulled this out of that thread, just thought it was impressive..... "On the basis of the ratio of BHP to displacement, one might argue that the Formula One engine is vastly superior (315 BHP per liter versus 140 BHP per liter). However, given the design latitude, which allows the Formula One engine to operate well at 20,000 RPM, perhaps there are better criteria by which to compare these engines."
Stone629 is offline  
Old 10-08-2011, 10:40 AM
  #15  
67mustang302
6th Gear Member
 
67mustang302's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: California
Posts: 10,468
Default

Originally Posted by Stone629
Out of all that technical info, I pulled this out of that thread, just thought it was impressive..... "On the basis of the ratio of BHP to displacement, one might argue that the Formula One engine is vastly superior (315 BHP per liter versus 140 BHP per liter). However, given the design latitude, which allows the Formula One engine to operate well at 20,000 RPM, perhaps there are better criteria by which to compare these engines."
Back before the rules changes, some of the Hondas were using a "Push to pass" system that enabled the driver to bump the rev limit in the engine up to 20,200rpm to stretch a bit more when passing in higher gears. They occasionally had reliability issues, but that's impressive for a V8 engine.

And all with no power adders. Right now they're all required to be n/a 2.5L V8's with a, 18,000rpm rev limit. The best engines are making somewhere around high 700's for horsepower.

The FIA has made it firm now, that starting for 2014 they're going to 1.6L turbo 6 cylinders. Ford is looking to reenter now(not a surprise with the success and performance of the Ecoboost). GM has also submitted an engine design proposal to the FIA, and Honda and Toyota are looking to reenter as well.
67mustang302 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ShaneB26154
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
35
03-04-2021 04:05 AM
YoungStangsMan
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
15
09-05-2015 07:01 PM
Lee1911
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
15
09-01-2015 02:12 PM
Calizic
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
5
08-28-2015 01:46 PM
kdryan
2005-2014 Mustangs
7
08-21-2015 04:01 PM



Quick Reply: Turbo PSI converted into engine displacement



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:14 AM.