Turbo PSI converted into engine displacement
#13
http://www.epi-eng.com/piston_engine..._cup_to_f1.htm
Something similar, though dealing more with naturally aspirated engines. It does give some good information for realistic comparisons of engines though.
Something similar, though dealing more with naturally aspirated engines. It does give some good information for realistic comparisons of engines though.
#14
Out of all that technical info, I pulled this out of that thread, just thought it was impressive..... "On the basis of the ratio of BHP to displacement, one might argue that the Formula One engine is vastly superior (315 BHP per liter versus 140 BHP per liter). However, given the design latitude, which allows the Formula One engine to operate well at 20,000 RPM, perhaps there are better criteria by which to compare these engines."
#15
Out of all that technical info, I pulled this out of that thread, just thought it was impressive..... "On the basis of the ratio of BHP to displacement, one might argue that the Formula One engine is vastly superior (315 BHP per liter versus 140 BHP per liter). However, given the design latitude, which allows the Formula One engine to operate well at 20,000 RPM, perhaps there are better criteria by which to compare these engines."
And all with no power adders. Right now they're all required to be n/a 2.5L V8's with a, 18,000rpm rev limit. The best engines are making somewhere around high 700's for horsepower.
The FIA has made it firm now, that starting for 2014 they're going to 1.6L turbo 6 cylinders. Ford is looking to reenter now(not a surprise with the success and performance of the Ecoboost). GM has also submitted an engine design proposal to the FIA, and Honda and Toyota are looking to reenter as well.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ShaneB26154
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
35
03-04-2021 04:05 AM
YoungStangsMan
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
15
09-05-2015 07:01 PM
Calizic
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
5
08-28-2015 01:46 PM