Suprized today!

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

03-26-2012, 02:17 PM

#11

S8ER01Z

6th Gear Member

Join Date: Sep 2006

Location: NC

Posts: 5,565

Just messaged the guy a bit ago to confirm... yeah the C5Zs hook like hell... bone stock they will pull 1.7x 60fts... and thats with the usual 350rwhp they made.

(evidence by Ranger)
60'.........1.783
330'.......5.038
660'.......7.669 @ 93.96 mph
1000'.....9.918
1320'...11.818 @ 117.26

03-26-2012, 02:33 PM

#12

Stone629

6th Gear Member

Join Date: Feb 2007

Location: North Carolina

Posts: 11,302

Hey nice numbers, Stig! I'd put you mid 11s on a bad day. Love those C5Zs.

03-27-2012, 01:13 AM

#13

The Stig

4th Gear Member

Thread Starter

Join Date: Apr 2007

Location: Georgia

Posts: 1,196

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mishri

yep, dyno #s mean nothing, 1/4 mile is where you'll find out how fast your car is. my '07 GT with near full bolt-ons (missing headers + mid pipe) dyno'd at 265whp, about 20-30whp less than most. but I was running really good 1/4 mile times, for here. (13.5@102, da corrected to 12.7@109).. and they do SAE correct dyno #s so it doesn't matter what the weather is like. It's possible between runs he just updated the SAE correction and gave you extra correction, they can make a dyno read as low or high as they want, maybe he thought something was off because of how low your friends were seeing so he gave it a little bump, and over did it, maybe it is right on...

Blue's guess at the 1/4 mile time is about what i would guess, which would be the same whether you gave us dyno #s or not...

While you are correct that dynos can read however the operators wants, dynos numbers do not mean nothing. They can be effective tuning aides and are great for comparing cars like we had that day. We had over 10 cars dyno'd and could compare our numbers. I was surprised to see the numbers and asked the operator if anything had been changed since the last person dyno'd. He said all the setting were the same and the only changes were the weather conditions that he updated between every car, which were pretty much the same since there was only 10-20 minutes between cars.

He even suggested the possibility that the previous owner put a baby cam in my car, but I mentioned that was pretty unlikely as it still have the stock exhaust manifolds when I bought the car.

Quote:

Originally Posted by S8ER01Z

Nice numbers...are those SAE or STD? That appears to be the same kind of dyno I made my numbers on... If you could hook on DRs I would put you mid 11s @ 120+...my friends 2003 Z06 went 11.25 @ 123mph with 389rwhp and ET streets... just a matter of hooking up.

Actual breakdown..
60' - 1.580
1/8 - 7.195 @ 97.83
1/4 - 11.259 @ 123.71

Edit: He did have 3.90s instead of stock gearing.

I don't know if they are SAE or STD. It would be pretty messed up to get kicked out of a track for no roll cage on a car with just a CAI, exhaust and DRs. But could be possible if I keep practicing my launch.

Quote:

Originally Posted by okbfd

Nice numbers.......and the sound.......lets just say the old man's private parts are quivering a bit

Thanks, I love the way the car sounds! The camera actually doesn't give it justice. I wish I could get a better recording of it. Actually one of my friends might have one because a lot of them were recording this too. I'll see if I can get one of their videos.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stone629

Hey nice numbers, Stig! I'd put you mid 11s on a bad day. Love those C5Zs.

Thanks stone! I would love that, unfortunately no 1/4 mile in the foreseeable future.

03-28-2012, 06:25 AM

#14

ctgreddy

6th Gear Member

Join Date: May 2007

Location: Dearborn, MI

Posts: 6,277

I'm gonna agree with the norm here, mid 11's and a low 120ish trap(120-123).

good numbers too! I wish mustangs made that much power with a full exhaust/intake. well, new ones do, but i want mine to! haha.