V6 (1994-2004) Mustangs Technical discussions on the 3.8L and 3.9L V6 torque monsters

NA vs. FI ???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-29-2006, 12:57 AM
  #11  
penceman
4th Gear Member
 
penceman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 1,008
Default RE: NA vs. FI ???

ORIGINAL: dhuskers_11

i dont need to be insanely fast but pretty fast. this is my daily driver i was kind of leaning towards the n/a because of price and dont have to swap out that much stuff like injectors do i?
Not with the power you're going to be making with NA.
penceman is offline  
Old 07-29-2006, 01:02 AM
  #12  
dhuskers_11
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
dhuskers_11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location:
Posts: 977
Default RE: NA vs. FI ???

about how much will i be making?
dhuskers_11 is offline  
Old 07-29-2006, 01:43 AM
  #13  
michaelbarry
2nd Gear Member
 
michaelbarry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location:
Posts: 357
Default RE: NA vs. FI ???

Depends on what you do. Bottom line is, FI is easier / cheaper to make power.
michaelbarry is offline  
Old 07-29-2006, 01:47 AM
  #14  
dhuskers_11
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
dhuskers_11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location:
Posts: 977
Default RE: NA vs. FI ???

ok so if i have

k&n intake
true dual exhaust
4.10s
tlok
sct xcal II

and then i get a new heads and a cam about how much horse or how quick will my car be?
dhuskers_11 is offline  
Old 07-29-2006, 02:06 AM
  #15  
michaelbarry
2nd Gear Member
 
michaelbarry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location:
Posts: 357
Default RE: NA vs. FI ???

I have no idea about heads or a cam..but you'll only pick up about ~15-20hp with the intake,exhaust,and xcal IMO. The 4.10's and T-lok will help a lot in the 1/4 though. More traction, more acceleration = good.
michaelbarry is offline  
Old 07-29-2006, 02:11 AM
  #16  
dhuskers_11
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
dhuskers_11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location:
Posts: 977
Default RE: NA vs. FI ???

the guy i talked to about the heads and cam said that i would gain about 70-80 hp with them. any estimates?
dhuskers_11 is offline  
Old 07-29-2006, 02:16 AM
  #17  
michaelbarry
2nd Gear Member
 
michaelbarry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location:
Posts: 357
Default RE: NA vs. FI ???

No estimates from me, I have no idea about any gains with cam / heads...I figure someone here does though.
michaelbarry is offline  
Old 07-29-2006, 02:21 AM
  #18  
NewMexMustang
5th Gear Member
 
NewMexMustang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location:
Posts: 2,680
Default RE: NA vs. FI ???


ORIGINAL: dhuskers_11

the guy i talked to about the heads and cam said that i would gain about 70-80 hp with them. any estimates?
were you talking to the guys from supersixmotorsports?
NewMexMustang is offline  
Old 07-29-2006, 02:45 AM
  #19  
deezelnut
I ♥ Acer
 
deezelnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,618
Default RE: NA vs. FI ???

if you build a 4.3stroker with 10.5:1 comp, heads, cam and intake manifolds you are looking at the price of a vortech. and the same power. that is before install and tuning. and since you probably can't build your own engine, the NA setup would cost a lot more with similar power.
deezelnut is offline  
Old 07-29-2006, 02:46 AM
  #20  
deezelnut
I ♥ Acer
 
deezelnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,618
Default RE: NA vs. FI ???


ORIGINAL: NewMexMustang


ORIGINAL: dhuskers_11

the guy i talked to about the heads and cam said that i would gain about 70-80 hp with them. any estimates?
were you talking to the guys from supersixmotorsports?
you might pick that up to the crank with other mods
deezelnut is offline  


Quick Reply: NA vs. FI ???



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:23 AM.