V6 (1994-2004) Mustangs Technical discussions on the 3.8L and 3.9L V6 torque monsters

Build up 3.8

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-31-2012, 07:46 PM
  #11  
jthorn9
The Godfather
 
jthorn9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Temple, Texas
Posts: 15,481
Default

Originally Posted by ESG-642T
It only needs as much as a 302 swap, which is not really that bad of a swap.
And, you know you can get up 4.6L out of a 3.8 =P
It's a bad enough swap. Having owned a 302 and a 3.8L they aren't similar at all. The swap is extremely complicated because very little is similar on the 3.8L to the 5.0L. The 94/95 5.0 (which is what you would have to swap to) is a very unique setup, even in 5.0 terms. While the basic motor swap isn't hard, its the wiring harness and electronics that gets people.

Largest kit I've seen is the 4.3L kit. Which even that I havn't seen much of. I'm assuming it might be because the larger strokes, just like with the 5.0s, have a problem with the rings over time. But then again I'm just guessing.
jthorn9 is offline  
Old 10-31-2012, 09:45 PM
  #12  
YoungMinor
 
YoungMinor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 7
Default

[QUOTE=jthorn9;8084224]It's a bad enough swap. Having owned a 302 and a 3.8L they aren't similar at all. The swap is extremely complicated because very little is similar on the 3.8L to the 5.0L. The 94/95 5.0 (which is what you would have to swap to) is a very unique setup, even in 5.0 terms. While the basic motor swap isn't hard, its the wiring harness and electronics that gets people.



I totally agree the wiring for this swap would be extremely complicated!
YoungMinor is offline  
Old 11-01-2012, 06:15 PM
  #13  
LilRoush
6th Gear Member
 
LilRoush's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: South FL
Posts: 8,540
Default

Not to mention not street legal in the US due to EPA regs and swapping an older motor into a newer car.
LilRoush is offline  
Old 11-01-2012, 07:13 PM
  #14  
YoungMinor
 
YoungMinor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 7
Default

You could always upgrade you 3.8 to a 4.2 with some longtube headers with a new exhaust... that should get you some more hp and tq


Posted from MustangForums.com App for Android
YoungMinor is offline  
Old 11-14-2012, 08:44 AM
  #15  
Juan Lopez
 
Juan Lopez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 41
Default

Why is everyone always overlooking the potential of just spending the money on building the 3.8? Maybe add some intense Nitro afterwards? I mean, you could spend the money on a swap first and then wait until you can afford to sink another few grand building that, but the truth is you already have a pretty decent starting point under your hood. If you want more displacement specifically GET A V EFFING 8
Juan Lopez is offline  
Old 12-08-2012, 05:49 PM
  #16  
EHardy1971
 
EHardy1971's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Alabama
Posts: 13
Default

Originally Posted by jthorn9
It's a bad enough swap. Having owned a 302 and a 3.8L they aren't similar at all. The swap is extremely complicated because very little is similar on the 3.8L to the 5.0L. The 94/95 5.0 (which is what you would have to swap to) is a very unique setup, even in 5.0 terms. While the basic motor swap isn't hard, its the wiring harness and electronics that gets people.
I've done a few of these swaps, and they're not THAT hard, providing you get the correct wiring harness and computer. The fuel lines also have to be swapped. The SN95 is easier to do than going from a 2.3 to a 5.0 on a Fox. Ask me how I know.
EHardy1971 is offline  
Old 12-09-2012, 05:17 AM
  #17  
Ironhandx
1st Gear Member
 
Ironhandx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Newfoundland
Posts: 58
Default

http://www.supersixmotorsports.com/

They have the stroker kit that you are looking for. They even have various components broken down into seperate kits so you can replace the heads and then replace the cam, rods and pistons later if cost is an issue.

Beyond that SSM and Morana make stroker engines that'll beat the new 3.7L and have forged internals for boosting. As long as you can drop 7.5-8k on it.
Ironhandx is offline  
Old 12-09-2012, 05:33 AM
  #18  
Ironhandx
1st Gear Member
 
Ironhandx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Newfoundland
Posts: 58
Default

Originally Posted by Juan Lopez
Why is everyone always overlooking the potential of just spending the money on building the 3.8? Maybe add some intense Nitro afterwards? I mean, you could spend the money on a swap first and then wait until you can afford to sink another few grand building that, but the truth is you already have a pretty decent starting point under your hood. If you want more displacement specifically GET A V EFFING 8
A lot of people look at building the 3.8 to a 4.2L because the 4.6 is a piece of **** as far as V8s go until you've put more than enough money into it to have built the 3.8 to a 4.2L times over(This can be done cheaply due to the windstar and F-150 motors that share the same block, if your goals aren't in the 600+ horsepower range). Plus then you have something a little more unique with 500+ hp anyways. I'd be less critical of this point of view if you were looking at a 3.7L to 5.0 coyote swap because the new 5.0 is a thing of beauty.

Then you're building your 3.8 and getting more displacement and (IMO) having more fun with it

Last edited by Ironhandx; 12-09-2012 at 05:46 AM.
Ironhandx is offline  
Old 12-10-2012, 12:05 PM
  #19  
Juan Lopez
 
Juan Lopez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 41
Default

Originally Posted by Ironhandx
A lot of people look at building the 3.8 to a 4.2L because the 4.6 is a piece of **** as far as V8s go until you've put more than enough money into it to have built the 3.8 to a 4.2L times over(This can be done cheaply due to the windstar and F-150 motors that share the same block, if your goals aren't in the 600+ horsepower range). Plus then you have something a little more unique with 500+ hp anyways. I'd be less critical of this point of view if you were looking at a 3.7L to 5.0 coyote swap because the new 5.0 is a thing of beauty.

Then you're building your 3.8 and getting more displacement and (IMO) having more fun with it
I totally agree the 4.6 is a piece of crap for V-8 performance. Part of why I went with the 3.8, as the 3.7 and 5.0 were completely out of my price range. All I'm saying is this though: most people are looking at roughly 1500-2k after it's all said and done (who pays 5k for a 4.2 stroke?) just to get the 4.2 swap done, and in the end you're up from 190bhp to like 210 or 215 was it? Torque goes up about the same if I remember correctly. $1500 is a good start on saving for boost/nos/tune, or good old fashioned engine overhaul. I think it would be sweet to bang out a 3.8 with 300 hp or so, and it has been done. I paid 6500 for my mustang, so unless I spend more than 10k getting there (unlikely), it is still cheaper and more manageable for me than to have financed a new 3.7 outright, though I would consider the latter a more preferable car.

Last edited by Juan Lopez; 12-10-2012 at 12:17 PM.
Juan Lopez is offline  
Old 12-10-2012, 01:59 PM
  #20  
Ironhandx
1st Gear Member
 
Ironhandx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Newfoundland
Posts: 58
Default

A 5k 4.2 swap is going to be making a lot more than 215 RWHP. You'll be in the ~290 range.

A 8k stroker gets you 320+ NA. If you put 20k into the car which gets you into the range of the 3.7's total price though, you can have it turbo'd to ~500 RWHP(plus suspension and all sorts of extra goodies that will be better than the new car) and smoke the new GT's. By a fair margin because you're so much lighter

500 is a fairly easily achieved figure btw. You can pick up an entire cobra fuel system, injectors to tank, fairly cheap(less than $500 some cases). Brakes for another $1400. Suspension $1500(or 5k if you're like me and go with a very-built IRS), engine for 7500-8k, MAF etc and used turbo for around another 3k... and you've got ~4-5k left over for various other oddities and labour before you reach your 20k.

The figure on how much lighter is ~4-600 lbs, which is enough to make your 500 horse equivalent to ~600 horse on the GT, which only actually has 420.

The ability to smoke a 2013 GT in a 2003 V6 is almost priceless however.
Ironhandx is offline  


Quick Reply: Build up 3.8



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:48 PM.