Notices
V6 S197 General Discussion This section is for technical discussions pertaining specifically to the V6 variation of the 2005 and newer Ford Mustang.

Afixer in MM&FF?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-27-2006, 03:48 AM
  #11  
bscottie
3rd Gear Member
 
bscottie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location:
Posts: 515
Default RE: Afixer in MM&FF?


ORIGINAL: LX200

I was a bit suprised by several things in the ad...

1. I thought the XCharger was putting like 280HP to the wheels, or is this the CA. model?
2. Does a GT only get slightly over 250 HP to the wheels? I would have thought it was more like 265?

If the data is for the CA model, and the GT wheel power is really only slightly over 250, then the HiPo XCharger should really spank a GT quite badly....

when Doug tuned my car he got 287.6rwhp and 290rwtq, different day, different dyno different hp (only 10 different)
bscottie is offline  
Old 10-27-2006, 11:26 AM
  #12  
Horrific_Ending
4th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
Horrific_Ending's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,037
Default RE: Afixer in MM&FF?

Well i do live in Cali, so i dont know whats up with it.
Horrific_Ending is offline  
Old 10-27-2006, 12:57 PM
  #13  
LX200
4th Gear Member
 
LX200's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,268
Default RE: Afixer in MM&FF?


ORIGINAL: bscottie


ORIGINAL: LX200

I was a bit suprised by several things in the ad...

1. I thought the XCharger was putting like 280HP to the wheels, or is this the CA. model?
2. Does a GT only get slightly over 250 HP to the wheels? I would have thought it was more like 265?

If the data is for the CA model, and the GT wheel power is really only slightly over 250, then the HiPo XCharger should really spank a GT quite badly....

when Doug tuned my car he got 287.6rwhp and 290rwtq, different day, different dyno different hp (only 10 different)
You have the HiPo kit, right? Those are GREAT numbers.... that equals like 325 or more at the crank. I wonder why EE is advertising such low HP when you have seen such high numbers.... that has to be the CA kit I guess, but it would help their marketing much more to advertise 280 RWHP.

ANYBODY KNOW WHAT A GT PUTS DOWN STOCK??
LX200 is offline  
Old 10-30-2006, 01:09 AM
  #14  
bscottie
3rd Gear Member
 
bscottie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location:
Posts: 515
Default RE: Afixer in MM&FF?


ORIGINAL: LX200


ORIGINAL: bscottie


ORIGINAL: LX200

I was a bit suprised by several things in the ad...

1. I thought the XCharger was putting like 280HP to the wheels, or is this the CA. model?
2. Does a GT only get slightly over 250 HP to the wheels? I would have thought it was more like 265?

If the data is for the CA model, and the GT wheel power is really only slightly over 250, then the HiPo XCharger should really spank a GT quite badly....

when Doug tuned my car he got 287.6rwhp and 290rwtq, different day, different dyno different hp (only 10 different)
You have the HiPo kit, right? Those are GREAT numbers.... that equals like 325 or more at the crank. I wonder why EE is advertising such low HP when you have seen such high numbers.... that has to be the CA kit I guess, but it would help their marketing much more to advertise 280 RWHP.

ANYBODY KNOW WHAT A GT PUTS DOWN STOCK??


one GT I know of with a manual tranny had 267rwhp and 275 rwtq on a dynojet bone stock, added exhaust upgrade, dyno tuned with an CAI and jumped to 288rwhp and 305rwtq, I'm right there with my hi-po kit, the Xcharger might not put down what everybody wants but it is ok for me and gave my car a big kick in the butt. and have had zero problems with either kit.
bscottie is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
LIVIN_LEGEND
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
10
01-28-2005 04:36 PM
roundman
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
0
08-26-2004 06:52 PM



Quick Reply: Afixer in MM&FF?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:55 AM.