Afixer in MM&FF?
#11
RE: Afixer in MM&FF?
ORIGINAL: LX200
I was a bit suprised by several things in the ad...
1. I thought the XCharger was putting like 280HP to the wheels, or is this the CA. model?
2. Does a GT only get slightly over 250 HP to the wheels? I would have thought it was more like 265?
If the data is for the CA model, and the GT wheel power is really only slightly over 250, then the HiPo XCharger should really spank a GT quite badly....
I was a bit suprised by several things in the ad...
1. I thought the XCharger was putting like 280HP to the wheels, or is this the CA. model?
2. Does a GT only get slightly over 250 HP to the wheels? I would have thought it was more like 265?
If the data is for the CA model, and the GT wheel power is really only slightly over 250, then the HiPo XCharger should really spank a GT quite badly....
when Doug tuned my car he got 287.6rwhp and 290rwtq, different day, different dyno different hp (only 10 different)
#13
RE: Afixer in MM&FF?
ORIGINAL: bscottie
when Doug tuned my car he got 287.6rwhp and 290rwtq, different day, different dyno different hp (only 10 different)
ORIGINAL: LX200
I was a bit suprised by several things in the ad...
1. I thought the XCharger was putting like 280HP to the wheels, or is this the CA. model?
2. Does a GT only get slightly over 250 HP to the wheels? I would have thought it was more like 265?
If the data is for the CA model, and the GT wheel power is really only slightly over 250, then the HiPo XCharger should really spank a GT quite badly....
I was a bit suprised by several things in the ad...
1. I thought the XCharger was putting like 280HP to the wheels, or is this the CA. model?
2. Does a GT only get slightly over 250 HP to the wheels? I would have thought it was more like 265?
If the data is for the CA model, and the GT wheel power is really only slightly over 250, then the HiPo XCharger should really spank a GT quite badly....
when Doug tuned my car he got 287.6rwhp and 290rwtq, different day, different dyno different hp (only 10 different)
ANYBODY KNOW WHAT A GT PUTS DOWN STOCK??
#14
RE: Afixer in MM&FF?
ORIGINAL: LX200
You have the HiPo kit, right? Those are GREAT numbers.... that equals like 325 or more at the crank. I wonder why EE is advertising such low HP when you have seen such high numbers.... that has to be the CA kit I guess, but it would help their marketing much more to advertise 280 RWHP.
ANYBODY KNOW WHAT A GT PUTS DOWN STOCK??
ORIGINAL: bscottie
when Doug tuned my car he got 287.6rwhp and 290rwtq, different day, different dyno different hp (only 10 different)
ORIGINAL: LX200
I was a bit suprised by several things in the ad...
1. I thought the XCharger was putting like 280HP to the wheels, or is this the CA. model?
2. Does a GT only get slightly over 250 HP to the wheels? I would have thought it was more like 265?
If the data is for the CA model, and the GT wheel power is really only slightly over 250, then the HiPo XCharger should really spank a GT quite badly....
I was a bit suprised by several things in the ad...
1. I thought the XCharger was putting like 280HP to the wheels, or is this the CA. model?
2. Does a GT only get slightly over 250 HP to the wheels? I would have thought it was more like 265?
If the data is for the CA model, and the GT wheel power is really only slightly over 250, then the HiPo XCharger should really spank a GT quite badly....
when Doug tuned my car he got 287.6rwhp and 290rwtq, different day, different dyno different hp (only 10 different)
ANYBODY KNOW WHAT A GT PUTS DOWN STOCK??
one GT I know of with a manual tranny had 267rwhp and 275 rwtq on a dynojet bone stock, added exhaust upgrade, dyno tuned with an CAI and jumped to 288rwhp and 305rwtq, I'm right there with my hi-po kit, the Xcharger might not put down what everybody wants but it is ok for me and gave my car a big kick in the butt. and have had zero problems with either kit.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
roundman
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
0
08-26-2004 06:52 PM