MRT AT v.s. FLOWMASTER AT

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

11-24-2006, 03:26 AM

#21

ilduce321

2nd Gear Member

Join Date: Apr 2006

Location: Naugatuck, CT

Posts: 485

RE: MRT AT v.s. FLOWMASTER AT

I have a single Flowmaster AT...here's a clip

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5QdwfTPUZ_8

It's plenty loud, and sounds great, but I am considering going with the MRT in the near future...maybe a Christmas present??

11-24-2006, 04:14 AM

#22

Ant69

2nd Gear Member

Join Date: Nov 2006

Location:

Posts: 150

RE: MRT AT v.s. FLOWMASTER AT

I'll probably end up putting in flow-through exhaust and/or crossover duals from one of the tuner companys, (some of the japanese import sixes sound pretty rough and tumble these days) but has anyone seen or heard of the Cervini/magnaflow side exit kit for the 4.6 being ran on the 4.0 just courious. And what kind of difference if any has anyone noticed with Headers it always made a huge difference in tone on V-8's and fours.